Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Although the effect of fragmentation on all parasite outcomes was weaker (but the effect of forest type on prevalence was marginally significant; p = 0.05), roost duration remained an important predictor for prevalence; the interaction between forest type and wing aspect ratio remained important for intensity variance (roost duration was also significant, as well as an interaction between forest type and diet); and wing aspect ratio remained important for mean intensity (Appendix S2 , Tables A8–A12). 4.
marginally significantp > 0.051.0× alphagold
34 While the association of HR-HPV infection and anal HSIL was marginally significant for both men and women living with HIV in our study (p > 0.05), others have reported a significant association between these variables, but when the HPV genotype has been considered, the fraction of anal cancer attributable to HPV-16 is smaller in the HPV-positive population. 35 Moreover, anal wart
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Interestingly, nurses’ extent of being educated in the subject wasn’t significantly related to their years of professional experience ( χ 2 (4) = 5.8; p = 0.22), whereas for physicians we found a marginally significant relationship ( χ 2 (4) = 9.3; p = 0.05).
marginally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
However, visual inspection suggests that the effect of RIV to reverse the effect of stress was present in the first test but not the second, and a further post hoc test confirmed that the difference between CON and STR RIV-treated animals was marginally significant in test 2 [t(1,14) = 2.30, p < 0.05].
marginally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
56) that would exacerbate the effects of a marginally significant violation of homogeneity of variance (Levene's test: p < 0.05 for both Seeing and Non-Seeing levels of the factor Condition) and the non-normality of the resulting residuals (Shapiro Wilks tests p < 0.05), it was obvious that a mixed-ANOVA design might not be reliable.
What is social about social perception research?
Front Integr Neurosci · 2012 · PMC3554956