“marginally significant”

The evaluation of the product was positively correlated with the health orientation, r (661) = 0.29, p < 0.001, the ecology orientation, r (661) = 0.17, p < 0.001, and the self-perceived knowledge of healthy eating; however, this relation was marginally significant, r (632) = 0.08, p = 0.05.

The within-group improvements over time were statistically marginally significant (p = .05) for EDUC only (Table 2 ).

A two-way (feedback × base interval) repeated-measures ANOVA indicated a marginally significant main effect of the base interval [ F (1,15) = 4.53, p = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.231], and a significant main effect of feedback [ F (1,15) = 5.80, p = 0.029, η p 2 = 0.279].

At maintenance (6 weeks posttreatment), the dyads showed a marginally significant effect compared to controls, ß = 3.12, SE = 1.58, t (203.54) = 1.97, p = .05.

Finally, there was a marginally significant association between overnight sleep duration and attention ( p = 0.05).

However, the coefficient for the Bmal1 −/− SCN was slightly positive and marginally significant (mean r s = 0.07±0.0336 SEM, t -test, p <0.05).

The analysis revealed a marginally significant condition × test event interaction, F (2,42) = 3.21, p = 0.050, η p 2 = 0.13, but no significant main effects.

Although the liver analysis trended toward significant differences from the lung, heart and lung epithelial organization, MANOVA was marginally significant ( p < 0 .05).

For the interval between successive dual pulses (inter dual pulse time), differences among species were marginally significant (F3,46 = 2.79, p = 0.05).

Marginally significant differences were found between younger participants and middle age groups [two-sample t-test, t (128) = 1.94, p = 0.05] [Fig. 4(B) ]; while no significant difference were observed between young and old groups [ t (58) = 1.51, p = 0.13] and middle and older age groups [ t (88) = 0.50, p = 0.62].

The characteristics of the two groups were similar, with a marginally significant difference in their distribution ( P > 0.05).

In comparison between ICD users and pacemaker users in terms of the SF-36 general health survey, a marginally significant difference was noted in the role of limitations due to emotional health (63 ± 28.6) for ICD patients compared to pacemaker patients (81.8 ± 28.1), (p=0.050).

The results showed that the three-way interaction effect was no longer significant after inhibition was controlled as a covariate ( F (4, 104) = 2.17, p = 0.078, and η p 2 = 0.077), and was marginally significant after working memory was controlled ( F (4, 114) = 2.46, p = 0.05, and η p 2 = 0.079).

Additionally, T2change in TMTBA exhibited a significant correlation with T2change in alpha1 ( r = 0.363, p = 0.023), and T6change in rumination showed a marginally significant correlation with T6change in alpha1 ( r = 0.330, p = 0.050).

All three messenger conditions produced statistically significant or marginally significant negative effects: President Tokayev ( β = − 0 . 074 , p < . 05 ), the Grand Mufti of Kazakhstan ( β = − 0 . 066 , p < . 05 ), and the Chief Sanitary Doctor ( β = − 0 . 063 , p < . 10 , where marginal significance indicates p-values between .05 and .10).

Similar to other studies, females were more strongly affected than males [ 10 ], a result that was marginally significant ( P-value = 0.05).

There was also a marginally significant effect of Vignette pair, F (1, 39) = 4.07, p = .05; η partial 2 = .094, as people gave higher innateness ratings to the vignette pair concerning flying compared to those concerning singing.

Significance levels were given as follows: § : marginally significant, P ≥ 0.05; *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001 and # : P < 0.0001.

However, “diet” alone seemed to have a marginally significant effect on microglia numbers [ F (1,14) = 4.46, p = 0.05].

A marginally significant interaction between bacterial manipulation and diet type ( F 8 , 30 = 2.35; p = 0.05) on the antibacterial activity of hemolymph was also observed.

Education was marginally significant too, but with a very small effect size [ F (1,80) = 3.97, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.05].

Analyses revealed only a marginally significant main effect of time on measures of vocal stability [F(1,17) = 4.43, p = 0.05].

The combination of the two samples, authorized by the absence of any significant clinical difference between them, showed a marginally significant association of the C allele (AFBAC, RA index cases 64.8% versus controls 58.2%, P = 0.05; TDT, 56.1% of transmission, P = 0.09) and a significant excess of the C-allele-containing genotype in RA index cases compared with controls (173 RA index cases versus 157 controls, P = 0.02).

adjusted activity (58%), a difference that was marginally significant ( P = 0.05).

However, the rate of contamination significantly improved after CDC gown removal demonstration, with marginally significant differences among different types of staff in the post-test ( P = .05).