“marginally significant”

The difference between groups for the FEV1/FVC ratio was marginally significant (p = 0.05).

Autonomy showed a marginally significant difference (p = 0.050, partial η2 = 0.012), with employed women scoring higher than homemakers.

Day 1 A marginally significant difference was seen in GWI (1587.2 vs 1165.6 mmHg %; p = 0.05, BF 10 = 1.53) and GCW (1805.4 vs 1349.1 mmHg %; p = 0.05, BF 10 = 1.69) between survivors and non-survivors.

For insulin (panel A), there was a significant main effect of adolescent exposure (F (1,18) = 12.6; p = 0.002), no main effect of diet (F (1,18) = 2.1; p = 0.15) and a marginally significant interaction (F (1,18) = 4.1; p = 0.05).

MCI scores of hospitals with fewer than 109 beds and those with more than 246 beds is marginally significant (p=0.05).

Results Across groups, there were marginally significant differences in T1 ALLO (p=.05) and ISO levels (p=.05).

When compared to expected frequencies of hemoglobinopathies in healthy Indians (less than 10%), this proportion (10%) is marginally significant (p = 0.05, one tailed distribution) but is preliminary in nature due to extremely small sample size.

The association between PRDM6 and percent dense volume was marginally significant ( P < 0.05), with direction of effect being consistent with that reported for percent dense area [ 5 ].

However, the p-value for this association was marginally significant (p = 0.05). 3.6 Antibiogram results for gram-negative bacterial isolates The susceptibility profiles of different gram-negative bacterial strains were analyzed, and the numbers and percentages of sensitive isolates are reported in Table 4 below.

In non-diabetic participants (n = 8610), though the associations of the two GRSs with the four lipids were weakened, the results of causal association analyses were consistent with the analyses in the whole study sample, except for TC which was marginally significant in analysis with the Conservative GRS ( P = 0.05) (Supplemental Table 6 ).

Longer distance from the vaccination centers was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

As regards news sharing intentions, evidence only partially supports HMP theory: people with stronger conservative leanings reported a higher (marginally significant) willingness to share news from Fox News rather than CNN when the news concerns COVID-19 complying behaviours ( β = 0.11, s.e. = 0.05, p < 0.05; table 8 and figure 4 d ).

Thus, we believe that only a minor fraction of the observed improvement (with low marginally significant correlation, r = 0.18, p = 0.05, Fig. 4c ) may be attributed to the additional sessions performed by those with the worse VA.

When all seven studies were considered, the pooled estimate became marginally significant, favouring higher F exposure (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.16; p = 0.05). 3.4.

Marginally significant covariates were set to a p value of < 0.05.

IBD and F ST class permutation test over full distance range All slopes of the regression with ln(distance) over the full range for all populations across Europe (2,518 km) and within each of the coastlines (563–1,497 km) were highly significant for either Euclidean distances or for sea current distances (Table 3 ), except for those of the Tyrrhenian Sea (not significant for Euclidean distances although marginally significant at p < 0.05 when considering sea current distances).

Smoking history was a marginally significant risk factor for pneumothorax (OR, 1.155 [95% CI, 1.000–1.333]; p = 0.050).

In older adults, the main effect of position was marginally significant, F (3,33) = 2.901, p = 0.05, and the P2 amplitude was greater at the 3 rd than the 4 th position ( p = 0.049).

When we collapsed across Choices 1 through 3, the difference between the control and stop groups was marginally significant ( p = .05).

Results were considered significant at p ≤ .05 and marginally significant between p > .05 and p ≤ .10. 3.

The total amount of PV-immunoreactive cells was marginally significant ( p = 0.05; Figure 3 e) as was the interaction by age ( p = 0.06).

The results showed that the three-way interaction effect was no longer significant after inhibition was controlled as a covariate ( F (4, 104) = 2.17, p = 0.078, and η p 2 = 0.077), and was marginally significant after working memory was controlled ( F (4, 114) = 2.46, p = 0.05, and η p 2 = 0.079).

sagittata population (20%), a difference that was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.76, P = 0.05, fig. 2 C ).

Notably, as shown in Table 2 , ACT combined with conventional rehabilitation showed a marginally significant greater improvement in depressive symptoms compared with ACT alone ( p = 0.05). 3.3.2 Anxiety Thirteen studies reported the effects of ACT on anxiety symptoms in stroke patients.

At the allelic level, a marginally significant difference was observed in the frequency of 5 and 6 alleles among HADS-A subgroups ( p = 0.05).