“marginally significant”

Complications and treatments Compared with those without COPD, patients with COPD had a significant higher likelihood of progressing to respiratory failure (19.2% vs 5.1%; P < .01), and a marginally significant higher likelihood of developing cardiac insufficiency (10.3% vs 2.6%; P = .050) (Table 3 ).

Despite this, prosthetic valve implantation (aOR = 2.05, 95% CI: 0.74–5.67) and prior antibiotic use (aOR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64–2.86) continued to demonstrate high, though limited access to dental care was marginally significant (aOR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.01–4.38, p = 0.05) (Table 7 ).

Other ethnicities showed a marginally significant reduction (-0.20, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.00, P = 0.05).

Age had a marginally significant correlation with traumatic events at baseline only ( p = .05).

Within the videogame group only, the pre- to post-test Raven increase was considered marginally significant ( p = 0.05), whereas the pre- to post-test Raven decrease for the documentary group was not significant ( p > 0.10).

Results are considered significant at p ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant from p > 0.05 to p ≤ 0.10. 3.

However, the testosterone by APOE4 interaction on p-Tau in the overall sample appeared to be mostly driven by women in that the testosterone and p-Tau relationship was marginally significant among female APOE4 carriers ( B = − 18.06, β = − 0.34, SE = 8.89, p = .05) but not among female non-carriers ( B = − 0.27, β = − 0.01, SE = 5.1, p = .96; Fig. 3 ).

Up to 2 h, nanoparticles at 6 mg/kg showed attenuated fever; this effect was not statistically ( p > 0.05) significant and indicated a marginally significant ( p < 0.05) change after 3 h ( p < 0.01) following 4 h of treatment in comparison to the control.

Additionally, analysis of sham rTMS studies showed a marginally significant decrease in YGTSS compared to baseline (MD = -4.39; 95% CI: [-8.75, -0.03], P = 0.050, I 2 = 0%; Figure 2A ).

Marginally significant main effect of stimulus pair (F=3.98, p=0.05) was revealed in the test phase, with controls showing a significantly higher preference in Frequent Winner vs Frequent Loser (FWFL) pair than patients (t=-2.25, p=0.028).

Only AT1R and M3R exhibited more pronounced (median effect sizes 12.8 and 20.2%, respectively) and marginally significant ( p ≤ 0.05, U-test) increases in NAB-positive compared to NAB-negative PACVS subjects.

The multivariable analysis model included marginally significant variables with a value of P ≤.05 in the bivariate analysis (chi-square test).

Safety measures during smog episodes were marginally significant with a coefficient of 0.34 (SE = 0.17), (OR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.00–1.98; p = 0.050), indicating that adherence to these measures could potentially reduce risk of COPD.

Notably, as shown in Table 2 , ACT combined with conventional rehabilitation showed a marginally significant greater improvement in depressive symptoms compared with ACT alone ( p = 0.05). 3.3.2 Anxiety Thirteen studies reported the effects of ACT on anxiety symptoms in stroke patients.

The mean age of the cases caused by liver abscess was 56.85 ± 15.45, which showed no statistical difference (p = 0.63) comparing with the others; however, the mean age of the UTI cases was older, and was marginally significant when comparing with the others (67.30 ± 13.89, p = 0.05, Mann–whitney U test).

Results Supplementation with synbiotic resulted in a significant decrease in the mean serum levels of HbA1c and hs-CRP ( p = 0.01 and p = 0.004, respectively), and marginally significant decrease in FBG ( p = 0.05) in the intervention group post- intervention.

However, a marginally significant interaction between group and menopausal status was identified ( p = 0.05), indicating that postmenopausal women in the placebo group showed a marked increase in symptoms (58.04%), whereas those in the intervention group showed a reduction of 34.51%.

Competence development only showed a marginally significant association with work‐related exhaustion ( p = .05) when included in the model with efficiency and violence; all other associations were non‐significant.

Statistical significance was evaluated with a two-sided significance level of 0.05 ( p ≥ 0.05 and < 0.10 were considered marginally significant).

A significant or marginally significant interaction between task and background color was found for NA score [ F (1,38) = 4.25, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.10] and TDR [ F (1,36) = 3.03, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.08], indicating that the effect of background color depends on the task.

Furthermore, Group × Task-type × Time interaction was found to be marginally significant [F(1, 29) = 4.08, p = .05, η p 2 = .12], indicating that the group differences were most likely inconsistent across Task-type (i.e., shape classification vs. digit classification).

These microbiota changes resulted in marginally significant differences between EG and CG at 2 and 3 months of age (RDA = 0.2% with p = 0.050 and RDA = 0.3% with p = 0.052, respectively; (supplementary Fig. 2A, Additional file 2 ).

For the comparison between early-OWO and NW-A children (columns 1 and 4 in Figure 2 ), 76 metabolites had significant associations with a difference in BMI trajectories ( p ≤ 0.05) and 23 remained significant after adjusting for multiple testing (FDR ≤ 0.05); for the comparison between late-OWO and NW-A children (columns 2 and 5 in Figure 2 ), 49 metabolites were marginally significant ( p ≤ 0.05) though none passed multiple testing correction (FDR ≤ 0.05); for the comparison between NW-B and NW-A children (columns 3 and 6 in Figure 2 ), only 22 metabolites were marginally significant ( p ≤ 0.05) and none passed multiple testing correction (FDR ≤ 0.05).

β species‐genetic diversity correlation was positive in the Western Indian Ocean using β jac ‐SD (Figure S2b ; Table 2 ; MLPE p ‐value < 0.01) and marginally significant using β jtu ‐SD (Figure 3c ; Table 2 ; MLPE p ‐value = 0.05), but never significant in the Caribbean Sea (Table 2 ; MLPE p ‐value > 0.05). 4 Discussion The spatial structure of habitats is recognized as a major determinant of connectivity between populations or communities by influencing how individuals move across space (Baguette et al. 2013 ; Cowman and Bellwood 2013 ; Riginos and Liggins 2013 ; Dalongeville et al. 2018 ).

Variables used in the multivariate model were those that had shown a marginally significant (p < 0.05) relation with the perinatal outcomes in univariate analysis.