“marginally significant”

The association between TB and rs721917 genotypes was marginally significant ( P = 0.050), and this significance was reduced after adjusting for age and gender (Table 2 ).

The evaluation of the product was positively correlated with the health orientation, r (661) = 0.29, p < 0.001, the ecology orientation, r (661) = 0.17, p < 0.001, and the self-perceived knowledge of healthy eating; however, this relation was marginally significant, r (632) = 0.08, p = 0.05.

This difference was still marginally significant at the 34-week recording ( P = 0.05).

At the 3-month follow-up, the between-group difference was marginally significant (GNT-W M = 7.75, 95% CI 6.91 to 8.59 vs GNT-D M = 8.56, 95% CI 7.72 to 9.41, mean difference = 0.81, 95% CI − 1.66 to 0.01, t 205 = − 1.94, p = 0.05, d = − 0.09).

30 , 31 Potential Joint Impact of Adherence Status and Age The marginally significant interaction between adherence status and age (F = 3.093, p = 0.050) suggests that adherence status might have varying effects on hallucination symptoms across different age groups.

Some of the strongest negative correlations with SWRs were observed in RE (unit in Figure 3b ), and the size of the effect was marginally significant in RE compared to non-RE units (p=0.05).

Results demonstrate that the juvenile–adult differential is statistically significant in Birmingham (χ 2 = 7.14, p = .004), marginally significant in Brisbane (χ 2 = 2.56, p = .05), and, in line with B&N, not significant in The Hague (χ 2 = 1.36, p = .12).

Marginally significant differences were found between younger participants and middle age groups [two-sample t-test, t (128) = 1.94, p = 0.05] [Fig. 4(B) ]; while no significant difference were observed between young and old groups [ t (58) = 1.51, p = 0.13] and middle and older age groups [ t (88) = 0.50, p = 0.62].

There was a correlation between the Q3 ratings and the PD values 2 min and 4 min after stimulation, though immediately after stimulation was marginally significant in the asynchronous condition (immediately, r = 0.434, p = 0.05; 2 min, r = 0.522, p = 0.02; 4 min, r = 0.463, p = 0.04).

The only metabolite that maintained a robust, marginally significant P value ( P <0.05) on VTE after MVMR was the triglyceride/total lipid ratio in small HDL (β=−1.91; P =4.49×10 −2 ).

A marginally significant effect on tonal target was also found [ F (1, 83) = 3,964, p < 0.05].

Additionally, the interaction between test timing and exercise method was significant [ F (4, 84) = 3.229, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.071], the interaction between test timing and CF level was marginally significant ( p = 0.050), and the interaction between test timing, exercise methods, and CF level was significant [ F (1, 84) = 3.328, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.072].

However, sensitivity analysis excluding Greco 2021 ( 30 ) showed a marginally significant effect ( z = −1.96, p = 0.05, SMD = −0.19, 95% CI: −0.38 to 0.00), with lower heterogeneity ( I 2 = 30%).

Patients with decreasing eGFR had higher transgelin levels (median 106.6 versus 83.9 ng/mL), although the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

Among the MISIC subsets, the DMD group showed marginally significant improvement in the block designing task ( t = –2.074, p = 0.050).

While Pipiens showed no overall difference in host preference within and across the three locations (F (2, 15) = 3.4, P = 0.06), a post-hoc analysis identified a marginally significant difference in the PI between the Netherlands and Greece ( P ≤ 0.05) and a significant difference in the PI between Switzerland and Greece ( P = 0.03), but not between the Netherlands and Switzerland ( P = 0.78) (Fig. 3 ).

The above pattern of results was evident in the significant ( F 1 ) and marginally significant ( F 2 ) Consistency × Location × Group interaction ( F (1, 55) = 4.51, p < .05, η p 2 = .08; F 2 (1, 2) = 12.99, p < .1, η p 2 = .87).

coli lysates expressing IsmA and SpiR revealed that SpiR generated a higher cholestenone signal, with a marginally significant difference ( U = 9.0, p = 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test).

Self-efficacy showed a marginally significant difference, F (3, 340) = 2.08, p = .05.

Networks with marginally significant FDR corrected p ‐values = .05–.06) are also reported here along with the corresponding significant uncorrected p ‐values.

In addition, we found a marginally significant correlation between students’ illness script richness and their diagnostic accuracy over the two sets of cases (CBCR and non-CBCR) combined (r=0.354, p<0.05).

There was a marginally significant reduction (χ 2 = 3.73, P-value = 0.05, OR = 2.57, 95% CI 0.97, 6.79) in the proportion of malnourished children that were malaria-positive at pre-intervention screening (20, 60.6%), compared to those that were malaria-positive at 1st post-intervention screening (7, 31.8%) after wearing pCAM.

The Wald χ 2 test was conducted using a two-sided hypothesis test with the significance level set ( α ) at 0.05 and considered p > 0.1 as insignificant, p < 0.1 as marginally significant, and p < 0.05 as significant.

For standard deviation, a marginally significant main effect of Group was found ( F 2,53 = 3.29, P = 0.05, = 0.11).

The change from baseline to year 1 was marginally significant (0.01< p <0.05).