“marginally significant”

Instead, differences between free pollination and forced self-pollination were marginally significant ( P = 0.051).

The difference between CSR scores at post-treatment and follow-up was marginally significant at p = 0.051.

In the LRRC32 MO-injected fish, there was a marginally significant increase in TTA (30% increase, P = .051), whereas TSA was reduced by 29% compared with controls ( P = .034).

In contrast, honey bees showed a marginally significant difference in pollen deposition per visit between downward (29.8 ± 3.0, N = 45) and upward flowers (21.9 ± 2.5, N = 33; Wald χ 2 = 3.808, p = 0.051; Figure 3b ). 3.4 Effects of Flower Orientation on Pollen Viability and Stigma Receptivity Pollen viability in P. cyrtonema was significantly affected by sampling time, floral orientation and weather conditions (sunlight vs. rainwater exposure; Table 1 ; Figure 4 ).

And the trend was marginally significant ( p =0.051).

When checked for differences between the two land-use types for major soil variables, a significant difference in TOC (glmm PQL; t = −2.8, p < 0.05) and a marginally significant difference in TN (glmm PQL; t = −2.0, p = 0.051), was present.

We found no evidence that average maternal LG was correlated with novelty scores for competition wins ( r = −0.184, p = 0.694, n = 7), and we found a marginally significant but negative correlation between the average amount of maternal LG and the novelty scores for CORT habituation ( r = −0.559, p = 0.051, n = 11; Fig. 3B ).

The molar loss of taurocholic acid decreased significantly (p=0.035), so the increased concentration of glycochenodeoxycholic acid resulted only in a marginally significant reduction in the total molar loss of bile acids (p=0.051).

There was a marginally significant effect of age, F (2, 42) = 3.1, p = .051, showing that the musicians group was older (26.5 years) than the bilingual (23.5 years) and the controls (22.9 years).

A paired samples t -test showed that there was a marginally significant difference ( t = -2.024, df = 35, p = 0.051) in the difference in pitch range (Tones 4 – 1) between IDS (mean = 97.724 Hz, sd = 75.934) and ADS (mean = 66.987 Hz, sd = 60.927).

After adjusting for demographic and vascular risk factors (Model 2), the association remained marginally significant (0.0046 vs. 0.0034 mL/TIV, p = 0.051), suggesting a potential independent effect of AF on cerebral white matter changes.

The negative binomial regression of socioeconomic factors and WNV incidence was also significant ( χ 2 4 = 35.42, p < 0.001); the variable ethnicity was statistically significant ( p < 0.001), housing foreclosure was marginally significant ( p = 0.051), and age was not significant ( p = 0.941) ( Table 4 ).

The interaction between session and sleep stage was found to be marginally significant (Wald chi-square (2, 73) = 6.0, p = .051).

Furthermore, having had ≥2 casual male partners had a marginally significant association with HIV seroconversion (aHR = 2.9, 95%CI = 1.0–8.4, p = 0.051).

Taken alone, this correlation was marginally significant (P = 0.051), but was non-signficant following Benjamini-Hochberg adjustments for multiple testing (P = 0.322).

( online supplementary table 1 ; marginally significant (p=0.051) for marriage status).

Only figural elaboration showed a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.051).

19.1%, 95%CI: 14.8%–24.3%), with marginally significant heterogeneity between these two groups ( p = .051).

The effect was marginally significant for FFMQ‐NJUD ( B = 0.06, SE = 0.03, p = .051) and not significant for MAAS ( B = 0.02, SE = 0.02, p = .392), but slopes were still calculated for these variables to provide a comprehensive view of the dynamics of all variables involved, regardless of their individual significance levels.

The difference in average sensitivity between CRT ( M = 1.45, SD = 1.14) and LCD ( M = 1.76, SD = 1.1) was again small, but we observed a marginally significant main effect of display type, F (1, 23) = 4.24, p = 0.051, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\eta }_{G}^{2}$$\end{document} η G 2 = 0.014, indicating better performance on LCD.

Other effects were not significant, except for the interaction of Gender-by-Group being marginally significant, Wald-χ2(1) = 3.81, p = 0.051.

If instead the most proximal predictor is added first (current contact) into a stepwise regression, including childhood contact as a predictor in the model accounts for a marginally significant additional portion of variance ( r 2 change = 0.009, F change (1,364) = 3.837, p = 0.051).

After controlling for the age of the referee in a partial correlation, the relationship between height and experience became marginally significant ( r (26) = −.37; p = .051).

As for the balanced trials, group effect was marginally significant, F (1,38) = 4.07, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.09 and math anxiety did not interact with number of digits ( p = 0.75).

Lifetime anxiety was associated with higher odds of the outcome (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.24–1.58, p < 0.001), and lifetime depression was marginally significant (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00–1.27, p = 0.051).