“marginally significant”

For trust (H5), the analysis revealed a marginally significant interaction effect (F(1, 504) = 3.729, p =.054, η2 = 0.004).

For the TD group, the difference between telic and atelic conditions was marginally significant, showing a more negative trend in the atelic condition compared to the telic condition: M = −0.789, SE = 0.409, t (756) = −1.931, p = 0.054 (see Figure 7 ).

In addition, while keeping all other factors fixed, the occurrence of ageusia during acute COVID-19 was also found to be a relevant predictor of the MoCA-B outcome, although the evidence supporting such an association remained marginally significant ( Table 4 ) (Wald test: estimate = −0.939, SE = 0.489, Z = −1.920, p = 0.054).

Looking at the effect of Language, Mann–Whitney tests were carried out on participants’ RCA scores in each type of display, revealing a significant effect of Language in the Polychrome condition, U = 42, Z = 4.26, p < 0.001; and a marginally significant effect in the Monochrome condition, U = 114, Z = 1.93, p = 0.054, with RCAs being produced more often in English than in Spanish in both types of display.

However, the decline was marginally significant for total CT scan utilization ( P = 0.054).

The relationship between biomass and maize root colonization intensity in excess water treatment was marginally significant (r 2 adj = 0.0567, F 1, 47 = 3.885, P = 0.054).

There was a marginally significant trial effect ( EST = −3.65, SE = 1.89, t = −1.93, p = 0.054).

When the third tertile patients were compared with the second tertile, we found marginally significant higher primary event and ICU admission ( p = 0.054).

The main effect of condition was marginally significant, [ F (2, 53) = 3.08, p = 0.054, η 2 p = 0.10], suggesting that the overall number of triplets generated varied across conditions ( M = 38.66, SD = 6.41 in the control condition, M = 35.72, SD = 8.23 in the foot tapping condition, and M = 42.22, SD = 9.15 in the articulatory suppression condition).

We also observed a marginally significant, medium, effect for emotion dysregulation ( p = 0.054, d = 0.45), such that having stopped NSSI was associated with lower scores on this variable.

As Figure 1 illustrates, the standardized regression coefficient between injury severity and EDA amplitude was marginally significant ( p = 0.054) and the standardized regression coefficient between physiological arousal and physical aggression was statistically significant ( p = 0.008), as was the indirect effect of injury severity on physical aggression ( β = 0.290, p = 0.018).

The main effect of task order was marginally significant ( F (1,32) = 4.01, P = 0.054, η 2 = 0.11), indicating that response reversals tended to be higher in the Auditory-Visual (5%) than the Visual-Auditory (3%) condition.

Interaction: To further explore the marginally significant position x hemisphere interaction ( F (2,44) = 2.586, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.124, observed power = 0.570), two 3-way (syllable position x electrode site x hemisphere) repeated measures ANOVAs for the ADS and IDS registers were conducted.

Tyrosine-related decreases in fMRI signals were associated with tyrosine-related decreases in RT slowing in bilateral putamen (right: r = 0.51 p = 0.01; left: r = 0.41 p = 0.046), which was also marginally significant in left middle frontal gyrus ( r = 0.40 p = 0.054) p1,2,3 .

No significant main effect of alignment was found, F < 1, but the main effect of congruency was significant, F (1,127) = 54.14, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.30, MSE = 317, and the main effect of font was marginally significant, F (2,127) = 2.99, p = 0.054, η 2 = 0.04, MSE = 55167, because, as shown in Figure 1B and demonstrated in post hoc HSD Tukey tests, participants were overall faster when words were presented in typical courier than in handwritten case ( p = 0.038; the other two comparisons, p s > 0.40).

The relationship between the satisfaction to work for one’s organization and the degree to which one’s work is manageable is positive at the 0.05 significance level for all regions except Region B, where the relationship is marginally significant ( p = 0.054 ).

Additionally, CKD reached marginally significant (OR=3•58, 95% CI: 0•98–13•06, P = 0•054) in multivariable analysis for female.

The interaction of ballgame experience and offside/non-offside trials was now marginally significant for reaction times, F (2, 33) = 4.51, p = 0.054, η 2 = 0.26.

The two-way interaction between the number of stickers shared and whose mood was being rated was marginally significant ( b = −0.05, SE = 0.04, t (186) = −1.94, p = 0.054).

The High-Tension Compensation group (Group 3) showed an increased trend in risk, but the result was marginally significant (aOR = 3.01, 95% CI: 0.98–9.27, P = 0.054), while the Latent Decompensation group (Group 2) did not show a significant association with preterm birth (P = 0.200).

Results from fNIRS indicated marginally significant lower oxy-Hb in the frontal region at TG as compared to BD ( p = 0.054) across both groups.

Consumption of breastmilk at time of sample collection had marginally significant effects on bacterial phylogenetic relatedness at 6 weeks after adjusting for other exposures and corrected gestational age (p=0.054).

A linear regression analysis comparing FL between the intervention and control groups found that only the knowledge items were marginally significant ( P = 0.054), with no statistically significant difference in the practice aspect before and after the intervention ( P = 0.657).

The results at 40% showed a marginally significant, F (1, 27) = 4.051, p = 0.054, η 2 part = 0.130, trend of the preference scores differing between the crawlers ( M = 51.59%, SD = 15.27%) compared to the non-crawlers ( M = 40.81%, SD = 13.57%), suggesting a slight preference for the fearful morph in the crawlers, and a preference for the happy face in the non-crawlers.

Current MDD was not significantly related to response (ps > .128), and compared to the results from the primary analysis above, one marginally significant ( p = .054) result became significant ( p = .046 for the relation between homework days per week and response for those in CBT), and one significant result ( p = .049) became marginal ( p = .074 for the relation between homework compliance and response for those in KY).