Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = 0.0541.1× alphagold
Of the serious tumors, DNMT3a protein expression was significantly higher than that in benign tumor samples ( P = 0.001); DNMT3b was marginally significant down regulated in ovarian cancers compared to that of the benign tumors ( P = 0.054); DNMT1 expression has no statistical difference between ovarian cancers and benign tumor tissues ( P = 0.837).
marginally significantP = 0.0541.1× alphagold
Regarding to the performance of MASCC score and biomarker levels as predictor tools ( Figure 2 ), MASCC score and PCT concentrations, measured at presentation to the ED, showed a similar and good ability to predict the development of serious complications, with ROC AUCs of 0.83 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74 - 0.89) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77 - 0.91), respectively, both higher than LBP (ROC AUC: 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61 - 0.78), although the difference was marginally significant (P = 0.054) when ROC AUCs of MASCC score and LBP were compared ( Table 3 ).
marginally significantp = .0541.1× alphagold
Following up this effect, pair-wise comparisons using Bonferroni correction revealed a significant difference between Training level 1 ( M = 0.01, SD = 0.03) and Training level 3 ( M = −0.02, SD = 0.03), t (22) = 2.76, p = .028, and a marginally significant difference between Training level 2 ( M = 0.01, SD = 0.02) and Training level 3, t (22) = 2.49, p = .054, suggesting that participants with less musical training were significantly more consistent in their dominant-side velocity (positive values), while highly musically trained participants were relatively more consistent in their subdominant-side velocity (negative values).
marginally significantp = .0541.1× alphagold
Comparable analyses demonstrated a marginally significant relationship between pre- to post-treatment changes in the covert fear vs neutral contrasts and PTSD symptom slopes for modularity (B = .29, t = 2.09; p = .054), but not global efficiency (B = -.21; t = -1.59; p = .13).