Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
Pooled analysis of studies using Knox tests For childhood leukaemia at time of diagnosis, a pooled analysis of 16 individual samples from 15 original studies [ 21 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 38 , 42 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 50 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 84 ] showed marginally significant space–time clustering ( p = 0.054) with an overall excess of close pairs of S = 1.1% (Table 2 , Fig. 2 ).
marginally significantP = 0.0541.1× alphagold
These tests cannot reject a model of neutral evolution for Old World monkey and hominoid H2A.L genes ( d N / d S = 0.79, P = 0.49 in a test to reject neutral evolution) (see Methods) but provide marginally significant evidence for purifying selection in the New World monkey H2A.L genes that lack C-terminal extensions ( d N / d S = 0.62, P = 0.054).
marginally significantp = .0541.1× alphagold
Current MDD was not significantly related to response (ps > .128), and compared to the results from the primary analysis above, one marginally significant ( p = .054) result became significant ( p = .046 for the relation between homework days per week and response for those in CBT), and one significant result ( p = .049) became marginal ( p = .074 for the relation between homework compliance and response for those in KY).
marginally significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
Additionally, there was a marginally significant interaction effect of Session*Category*Treatment (F (2157) = 3.050, p = 0.054; effect size: η p 2 = 0.035; Greenhouse–Geisser-corrected due to departure from sphericity); with local and historical treatments of ambiguous artworks showing higher scores during retest session (local M = 564.30, SD = 201.43; historical M = 522.26, SD = 179.37) than the baseline, and global and historical treatment of non-ambiguous artworks showing higher scores in the retest session (global M = 537.15, SD = 172.49; historical M = 541.87, SD = 184.97) than the baseline ( Table 1 , Figure 4 and Figure 5 ).
marginally significantp -value = 0.0541.1× alphagold
Statistical analysis with the Mantel test for the smaller subset of Nyong samples resulted in a positive and marginally significant correlation between the geographic and genetic distances (r = 0.2785, p -value = 0.054), whereas the test performed for the Mapé set of isolates resulted in a small non-significant negative correlation (r = -0.04774, p -value = 0.676).