“marginally significant”

More importantly, the interaction effect was marginally significant, b = 0.35, SE = 0.18, t = 1.92, p = 0.056, 95% CI [−0.009, 0.72] (see Figure 4 ).

However, the AULCSF of the iAVT group showed a marginally significant within-group improvement from base to week 10 (0.78 versus 0.89; 95% CI −0.225 to 0.001; p = 0.056), while no significant change was observed in the patching group.

Both performances were significantly above the 0.50 chance level (for trials with G: t (11) = 25.72, p<0.0001; for trials with S: t (11) = 12.47, p<0.0001) and the difference between them was marginally significant ( t (11) = 2.13, p = 0.056).

In the upper visual field, we observed a significant, but Bonferroni uncorrected, response when the hand pointing was directed toward the right (contralateral) hemifield ( T 14 = 2.853; p = 0.013), and a marginally significant effect when the hand pointing was directed toward the left (ipsilateral) hemifield ( T 14 = 2.080; p = 0.056).

We found a marginally significant effect of robot verbal support on participants' psychological safety scores ( c = 0.35, SE = 0.18, p = 0.056), where participants in groups with robot verbal support had slightly higher psychological safety scores ( M = 6.06, SD = 0.74) than participants in groups without robot verbal support ( M = 5.92, SD = 0.74).

However, after applying the Bonferroni correction, only maternal sensitivity, maternal controlling behavior, and infant cooperative behavior remained significantly associated with types of maternal violation in the FSFF, while maternal unresponsivity was marginally significant ( p =.056).

From the posthoc comparisons, a marginally significant difference was observed between the positive and neutral doctor–patient relationship stimuli ( p = 0.056; Fig. 2 ): the positive doctor–patient relationship stimuli (1.69 ± 3.45 μV) elicited a more positive P2 than the neutral ones (0.89 ± 3.62 μV).

After adjusting for age, sex, the association remained marginally significant (adjusted OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00–1.10; p = 0.056) ( Table 3 ).

Flax-seeds were more frequently consumed in the n -6/ n -3 < 10 group but the differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.056) and no other differences were observed.

Psychopathy In the German male sample, overall emotion recognition ability showed a marginally significant interaction effect with psychopathy in predicting emotionally manipulative tactics [ B = 1.57, SE = 0.81, F (1,61) = 3.80, Δ R 2 = 0.04, p = 0.056, 95% CI (−0.04; 3.18)].

Furthermore, the response time to fearful expressions showed a marginally significant increase in the MBCT group at the end of the study ( p = 0.056) ( Table 3 and Figure 3B ).

The mixed-design ANOVA for the accuracy data (Hits and CRs) revealed significant main effects for Object ( F (1, 55) = 29.46, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.35) and for Background (F (1, 55) = 15.15, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.22), a marginally significant main effect for Culture (F (1, 55) = 3.80, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.07), and interactions between Object and Culture (F (1, 55) = 7.01, p = 0.011, η p 2 = 0.11) and between Object and Background (F (1, 55) = 41.94, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.43).

Result We first conducted a 2 (priming type: individualism, collectivism) ×4 (social distance of close target: individual in the same country, individual in the same town, friend, family member) × 2 (individuals toward whom empathy is extended: socially distant target only, socially close target only) × 2 (contribution level: empathic, prosocial act) repeated ANOVA and found a marginally significant main effect of priming, F (1, 199) = 3.70, p = 0.056, ηp 2 = 0.02, a post hoc test found that participants’ overall moral judgments were significantly higher in the collectivist priming condition ( M = 6.19, SD = 0.12) than in the individualist priming condition ( M = 5.87, SD = 0.11), in which collectivism had higher overall moral ratings than individualism for different types of acts.

For all first teacher–child dyads together the analysis revealed a small, marginally significant increase in Closeness (TAU = 0.23, p = .056).

Donor age at or above 35 years and the presence of donor‐specific antibodies with a history of antibody‐mediated rejection (both p < 0.05) were associated with worse graft survival, while medication non‐adherence was associated despite being marginally significant ( p = 0.056).

Partial correlation also revealed a marginally significant relationship between SRS (total) T score at baseline and 12-month TTS, controlling for baseline TTS, r partial = 0.312, p = 0.056 (Spearman).

In addition, we observed marginally significant negative indirect effects of LHC through PHYSCHEM (β = -0.125, p = 0.056) and VEG (β = -0.234, p = 0.061), suggesting a tendency for LHC to negatively impact the relative abundance of Pelophylax spp. by altering the vegetation and the physical and chemical characteristics of the waterbody (Online Resource Table 10 ).

On uni-variate analysis demographic factors significantly associated with psychological distress included previous pregnancy loss ( p = 0.001) and primigravida ( p < 0.0001), while infant death was marginally significant ( p = 0.056).

There was a marginally significant difference between sides for aerosol cages ( F 1,11.5 = 4.5, P = 0.056).

Frequency of homelessness was positively related to hopelessness score; this association was marginally significant in the initial bivariate analysis (p =.056; see Supplementary Table 2 ) and statistically significant in the multivariable adjusted model ( p =.048; see Table 4 ).

There was also a marginally significant difference in percentage of total sleep time spent in REM: children and adolescents with craniopharyngioma spent 1.7% less sleep time in REM ( p = .056) than healthy counterparts.

A marginally significant trend was found at the post-treatment assessment for the differences between the experimental vs. control groups (MMSE Δmean = 5.60; SE = 3.41; p = 0.056).

According to Tukey contrast test, the difference in patency rates between CS and AHB is marginally significant ( p = 0.056).

Among participants with PTSD, the weekday and weekend differences were attenuated but remained significant or marginally significant when random slopes for weekday and weekend differences were included, (intrusion: p = .056, avoidance: p = .031, negative cognitions: p = .012, and hyperarousal: p <.001). 4 Discussion Using an EMA approach, this study examined the day of the week variation in each of the DSM-5 PTSD symptom clusters (intrusion, avoidance, negative cognitions/mood, and hyperarousal) across 15 days in individuals with and without PTSD.

We observed a decrease in proliferation in Bi-L E7 / K14 – tTA / FancD2 +/+ mice treated with doxycycline that was marginally significant ( P = 0.056) compared to that observed in Bi-L E7 / K14 – tTA / FancD2 +/+ mice not treated with doxycycline.