“marginally significant”

For the two individuals as a pair ( Fig 3B ), the proportion is lower (3.1±0.8%, p = 0.8), and the evidence against models without WHG-related ancestry is weaker (although still marginally significant; p = 0.02–0.04).

Time was found marginally significant, where T2 score ( M = 3.77, SE = 0.05) was slightly lower than baseline ( M = 3.89, SE = 0.04; p = 0.02) and T1 ( M = 3.91, SE = 0.05; p = 0.001).

The effect of NO 3 and the interaction between NO 3 and OE were insignificant, but the difference in mean survival between heated tanks with and without OE was marginally significant (t 15 = –2.63, P = 0.020).

For diversity of race, the moderating effect of an MS diagnosis was marginally significant (β=–5.878, 95% CI –10.889 to –0.868; P =.02) such that this network feature was not significantly associated with physical function in either pwMS (slope=–2.968, 95% CI –6.893 to 0.956; P =.14) or controls (slope=2.910, 95% CI –0.224 to 6.044; P =.07; Figure 2 B).

The difference between groups GV (87%) and V (53%) was marginally significant (corrected α = 0.017, Z = 1.99, P = 0.02), though the difference between groups G (67%) and V (53%) was non-significant ( Z = 0.74, P = 0.23), and the difference between groups GV (87%) and G (67%) was not significant either ( Z = 1.29, P = 0.09).

Allele frequencies for all SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, except for rs2471738, for which a marginally significant deviation was seen in cases ( p = 0.02) but not in control subjects ( p = 0.9).

Latakia also demonstrated a significant positive association with ASD (β = 1.84, 95% CI [.48, 3.19], P = .01) and a marginally significant association with PHQ-9 (β = 1.65, 95% CI [.19, 3.12], P = .02), but no significant association with GAD-7 (β = 1.21, 95% CI [−.21, 2.65], P = .09).

The main effect of Singer was small and marginally significant, F(1,64) = 5.8, p < 0.02, η 2 p = 0.08.

The 2 group×3 stem type ANOVAs on response time to speech stimuli yielded marginally significant main effects of stem-type (F1(2,68) = 4.64, p<.02, F2(2, 29) = 2.20, p<.13).

With respect to Picture Description, for the percentage of nouns, statistically or marginally significant effects were found for patient XTY both pre- ( p = 0.020) and post-treatment ( p = 0.066) and for patient FAY post-treatment ( p = 0.022).

Although a relatively lower percentage of hemizygous replication patterns was consistently observed for ZFX in each of the cell types analysed, no statistically significant differences were found when the replication profiles for PCDH11X and ZFX were compared in either blood, line 1 or gorilla, and only a marginally significant difference was observed in line 2 ( p < 0.02).

Given the three dependent variables, Bonferroni correction for multiple hypotheses testing yielded a p -value of 0.016, and the effect remained marginally significant ( p = 0.02).

For AP-Phe-Az and AP-Prop-Tyr, the corresponding theoretical AP proportions tended to be slightly increased, which was found to be marginally significant ( p = 0.02–0.03).

Finally, 519 of these gene overlapped with the genes dysregulated in either autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression or alcoholism [ 34 ], with a marginally significant overrepresentation for the schizophrenia group (Fisher’s exact test OR [95%CI] = 1.3 [1.04, Inf], p = 0.02, Supplementary Fig.

A marginally significant simple main effect of type of pre-activation was observed within match trials, F (1, 29) = 6.66, p = 0.02, η 2 ρ = 0.19, but not in mismatch trials, F (1, 29) = 2.22, p = 0.15, η 2 ρ = 0.07.

Although the model estimates were slightly attenuated, associations remained marginally significant for relationships of immigrant status with GrimAge2 (β = −1.04-years, 95%CI: −1.87, −0.21, p = 0.02) and DunedinPoAm (β = −0.02, 95%CI: −0.03, −0.001, p = 0.04) in models adjusted for lifestyle and health factors (Table S2).

We detected a marginally significant reduction in TKW associated with the gpc-A1 and gpc-A1/gpc-B2 mutant genotypes ( P =0.02, Additional file 1 : Figure S2a).

Pre-planned independent samples t -tests for each non-sensorimotor ROI–rsROI pairing revealed marginally significant group differences in connectivity between the PMv rsROI and the planum temporale ( t (17) = 2.556, p = 0.020, p HB = 0.082) and between the PMv rsROI and posterior insula ( t (17) = 2.934, p = 0.009, p HB = 0.037), as predicted.

Although the scores did not show significant differences between groups 2 and 3, there was a marginally significant differences (p=0.020) between the 2 groups, with a clear difference between groups 1 and 3 (p=0.002).

In this study, IELSG score showed marginally significant difference between BCL-6 (+) and BCL-6 (-) ( P = 0.02).

Tissue biomarker changes Although the median decrease in Ki-67 change in non-obese participants was similar among the three dosing regimens, the median reduction of 4% in Ki67 in the TIW dose schedule in obese women was less than the 8% median reduction in the QD arm which was marginally significant ( p = 0.02).

A marginally significant difference in median oxygen flow rate before bronchoscopy was noted between the Jackson group and the conventional group ( P = .02).

The per allele effect for TCF7L2 (rs7903146) for affecting blood 25(OH)D concentration was marginally significant Beta ± SE (-0.011, 0.005), P = 0.02, Z score = -2.30, and no association was observed in KCNQ1 (rs2237896) with 25(OH)D concentration Beta ± SE (-0.005, 0.01]), P = 0.26, Z score = -1.18 after adjusting for age, gender, and T2D (Supplementary Table 2 ).

The modified YGJT group showed a marginally significant reduction in myelosuppression compared to the control group (RR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43–0.92, p = 0.02) ( Figure 8A ).

In contrast, the genetic correlation between self-harm phenotypes and chronic pain were relatively weak and either marginally significant or nonsignificant (self-harm ideation: r g [95% CI] = 0.14 [0.05 to 0.22], p = .02; self-harm behavior: r g [95% CI] = 0.13 [0.01 to 0.26], p = .47).