“marginally significant”

Age had no significant association ( P > 0.05) with mastitis prevalence, whilst parity had a marginally significant association ( P = 0.056) with mastitis prevalence ( Table 2 ).

The analysis yielded a marginally significant main effect of Valence Type [ F (2, 70) = 2.94, p = 0.056, η 2 p = 0.078] and a significant Valence Type x Accent Group interaction [ F (1.96, 68.83) = 3.72, p = 0.030, η 2 p = 0.096].

Only change in the total score for the social provision scale from baseline to 6-months had a relationship with change in the 6-minute walk and this effect was small and marginally significant, r = 0.21, p = 0.056.

Types of narcissism had marginally significant main effect on other-rated creativity performance, F (2, 107) = 2.95, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.05.

Accuracy rates For accuracy rates, the first model with age and retirement was marginally significant and explained 22.2% of the variance ( R2 = 0.222, adjusted R2 = 0.154, p = .056).

Frequency of homelessness was positively related to hopelessness score; this association was marginally significant in the initial bivariate analysis (p =.056; see Supplementary Table 2 ) and statistically significant in the multivariable adjusted model ( p =.048; see Table 4 ).

The mixed-design ANOVA for the accuracy data (Hits and CRs) revealed significant main effects for Object ( F (1, 55) = 29.46, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.35) and for Background (F (1, 55) = 15.15, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.22), a marginally significant main effect for Culture (F (1, 55) = 3.80, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.07), and interactions between Object and Culture (F (1, 55) = 7.01, p = 0.011, η p 2 = 0.11) and between Object and Background (F (1, 55) = 41.94, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.43).

Influence of marital status on ICSS Although a better 5-year ICSS was observed in married individuals compared with unmarried individuals diagnosed with ICC (13.0% vs 11.6%) (Figure 1C ), the log-rank χ2 test indicated that the difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.056).

Normal levels of WBC compared to leukocytosis were associated with about half the odds of re-visit, although this was marginally significant (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.23-1.02, p = 0.056).

However, after applying the Bonferroni correction, only maternal sensitivity, maternal controlling behavior, and infant cooperative behavior remained significantly associated with types of maternal violation in the FSFF, while maternal unresponsivity was marginally significant ( p =.056).

First, the sex difference in achieving clinical remission during follow-up was statistically significant only in Southern Europe (odds ratio [OR] of female vs male =1.45, P <0.001) and North Africa and the Middle East (OR =1.36, P =0.046) at a significance level of 0.05, and marginally significant at a significance level of 0.1 in Northern Europe (OR =1.15, P =0.056), Central and Eastern Europe (OR =1.19, P =0.057), and also in East Asia (OR =1.30, P =0.077).

3 C; P = 0.003 and 0.0006, respectively), whereas that of GR was marginally significant (P = 0.056).

Subsequent analysis performed on each notation revealed that a significant grade × distance interactions in Mixed ( β = −0.04, p = 0.030) and a marginally significant interaction in Nonsym ( β = −0.06, p = 0.056), but no significant interaction in Sym ( OR = −0.07, p = 0.208).

Adolescent gender was kept in the model because of a marginally significant effect ( b = −0.28, p = 0.056), and the other nonsignificant covariates were removed from the subsequent models.

We found a marginally significant interaction between year and genetic cluster for condition index (year × genetic cluster: F df=3 = 2.5351, p = 0.056; Table S10 ), likely representing differences in the condition of oysters among genetic clusters in fall 2018 (with gME lower than gVA) that were no longer present in 2020 (Figure 5a ).

LBD) demonstrated a significant main effect for picture position [ F (14,280) = 206.97, p < .001, η 2 = .91] and a marginally significant main effect for participant group: RBD patients tended to have a higher proportion of first object reports compared to LBD patients [ F (1,20) = 4.12, p = .056, η 2 = .17].

After adjusting for age, sex, the association remained marginally significant (adjusted OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00–1.10; p = 0.056) ( Table 3 ).

In terms of accuracy, the participant showed a significant improvement in the motion discrimination task ( P = 0.041) and a marginally significant improvement in the localization task ( P = 0.056).

Furthermore, a marginally significant effect of plant community richness on network–level specialization was observed ( p = 0.056) (Figure 6H , Table 3 ).

Unadjusted nonparametric analyses revealed significant improvements in disability outcomes at 3 months postsurgery ( P =0.003) and marginally significant improvements at 6 months ( P =0.056) and 1 year postsurgery ( P =0.082) ( Table 3 ).

3 D ) and only a marginally significant correlation with SRL (R2 = 0.049, P = 0.056, Fig. 3 E ).

Only the correlation between item memory for phonological similar items and non-word reading was marginally significant, r = -0.254, p = 0.056, N = 57, and even this association should be interpreted with a degree of caution given the fact that Table 2 contains 24 separate correlations.

Flax-seeds were more frequently consumed in the n -6/ n -3 < 10 group but the differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.056) and no other differences were observed.

There was also a marginally significant difference between Generation X and Silents ( p = .056, d = .262) and between Baby Boomers and Silents ( p = .048, d = .247), while the difference between Generation X and Baby Boomers was not significant ( p = .994; d = .01).

Between pre-ictal and mid-seizure, EZ-nR connectivity declined considerably ( p ≈0.002), followed by a marginally significant fall for RnEZ-nR (p=0.056).