There was a marginally significant difference in all-cause mortality between BEN and non-BEN patients (35.0 vs. 45.1%, HR 0.63 [0.39, 1.02], log-rank p = 0.057) which became significant after adjustment for multiple risk factors and probable confounders (listed in Model 3 of linear regression) (aHR 0.36 [0.17, 0.79]) (Figure 1 ).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
The encoding time for initial fixations was 214ms ( SD = 23ms) for the upper screen and 220ms ( SD = 21ms) for the lower screen; this difference is marginally significant, t (14) = 2.08, p = .057.
The pattern of adaptive plasticity was also evident for gene expression in samples collected at 8 hours after spray, where 44 out of 56 genes with plastic and evolved responses showed adaptive plasticity (binomial p = 2 × 10 −5 ), and marginally significant at 32 hours after spray, where 44 of 71 genes with significant adaptive and plastic responses exhibited adaptive plasticity (binomial p = 0.057, Fig.
Additionally, Approach Motivation was also non-significant ( b = −0.02 [−0.07, 0.03], z = −0.84, p =.40), and Mood Disturbance was marginally significant ( b = 0.07 [−0.003, 0.14], z = 1.90, p =.057).
But the difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was marginally significant ( p = 0.057).
Physical aggression was predicted by higher observer and provocation sensitivity (marginally significant results for lower victim and perpetrator sensitivity, p = 0.057 and 0.063, respectively) in men and by higher observer, rejection, and provocation as well as by lower perpetrator and moral disgust sensitivity in women.
The sex ratio was also entered as a covariate because it was marginally significant ( P = 0.057) and, clinically, gender differences can affect balance performance [ 17 , 18 ]. 3.2.
In terms of clarity, they appeared to be slightly more positive towards the interaction with the CT ( M = 4.85, SD = 0.34) compared to the RT ( M = 4.45, SD = 0.37) (see Figure 4A ); however, statistically, these findings were marginally significant with a moderate effect size ( Z = −1.903, p = 0.057, r = −0.43).
Because of a marginally significant interaction of temperature and endosymbiont infection status on the model (F 1,183 = 3.61; P = 0.057), a step-down analysis of the endosymbiont effect on sex ratio was performed for each thermal treatment separately.
There was no significant difference in overall survival between high and low risk patients according to N stage (N0-N1) ( P =0.13) and marginally significant discriminatory effect of tumor stage (T1-T2) ( P =0.057) between high risk versus low risk.
Moreover, the children in the LEW status showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.057) lower waist-to-height ratio than those in the SEW status ( Table 2 ).
In addition, in our study the difference in mean age between the two groups is marginally significant ( P -value = .057), and this might have contributed to the observed difference in G6PD activity levels.
crus-galli was significantly different from that of the monoculture, increasing to 10±3.7% ( t = 2.3, P <0.05), and represented a marginally significant increase of maize total biomass in the presence of AMF, compared to the NM controls ( t = 2.1, P = 0.057; Fig. 3A ).
7 Similarly, a repeated measures ANOVA revealed a marginally significant interaction between media framing and the other participant’s nationality on the expected rate of outgroup preemptive strikes, F (1,125) = 3.69, p = 0.057, partial η 2 = 0.03; pairwise comparisons indicated that under both experimental conditions the expected rates of Chinese preemptive strikes (mo
Sensitivity analyses Sensitivity analyses based on multiple imputation data showed highly similar results; for example, all significant results reported above were also significant except for physical quality of life, which became marginally significant ( P = 0.057).
For belief in the paranormal, we found significant rationality × sample (β = .35, p = .003) and experientiality × sample interactions (β = −.24, p = .036), as well as a marginally significant CRT × sample interaction (β = .21, p = .057).
Type 2 diabetes status was marginally significant (p = 0.0570).
Bilingualism had a positive and marginally significant effect on Cognition ( β = 0.050, SE = 0.026, p = 0.057).
For STG, there was a marginally significant main effect of group ( F (1, 58) = 3.782, p = .057).
Also as expected, among participants high on national identification, we found a marginally significant interaction between self-esteem and mortality salience, β = −0.21, t (166) = −1.91, p = 0.057, 95% CI [−0.43, 0.01].
Plant resistance had a marginally significant effect on CV of damage ( χ 2 2 = 5.74, p = .057).
( 5 ) with the exception of the interaction between general confidence and the false dummy being marginally significant ( P = 0.057), though still in the expected direction.
This difference was marginally significant, t (41) = −1.962, p = 0.057, d = −0.350.
The timing of the event during the first trimester of pregnancy was marginally significant ( p = 0.057), and this effect was reduced substantially by the addition of gestational age to the model.
In the TD group, there was a marginally significant relationship between accuracy scores and FIQ ( r (52) = .26, p = .057), such that participants with higher intelligence also had higher expression recognition scores.