Also as expected, among participants high on national identification, we found a marginally significant interaction between self-esteem and mortality salience, β = −0.21, t (166) = −1.91, p = 0.057, 95% CI [−0.43, 0.01].
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
In the present study, we found a trend of a marginally significant positive association between nutrition-related knowledge and DDS ( p = 0.057).
The main effect of Gender was marginally significant for accuracy (F(1, 58) = 3.8, p = 0.057 [p = 0.062]).
Correlation between age of onset and language dominance was marginally significant, χ 2 (2) = 5.728, p = 0.057, φ = 0.383. 7 Recall that there were significant differences between 2L1 and eL2 children with regard to paternal school education and between MON and 2L1 children as well as between 2L1 and eL2 children regarding non-verbal IQ (see Table 1 ).
The negative link between backward scores and the DLQ was marginally significant ( r = –0.19, 95% CI = –0.37; –0.06, p = 0.057), suggesting that this WM measure may also be related to self-reported cognitive difficulties in everyday life.
The timing of the event during the first trimester of pregnancy was marginally significant ( p = 0.057), and this effect was reduced substantially by the addition of gestational age to the model.
In the Bonferroni multiple comparison test, the decreased group had significantly lower depressive symptoms compared to the increased group ( P = 0.012) and had marginally significant lower depressive symptoms compared to the stable medium group ( P = 0.057) in the crude model (Model 1).
functional network connectivity ICA modularity R-fMRI schizophrenia Connectivity strength of the whole network is slightly higher (as is evident in Figure 1 ) in HCs (HCs: 0.558 ± 0.035; SZs: 0.541 ± 0.025; P = 0.057, marginally significant).
The effect of rotation was significant for the latency of the concurrent temporal sources ( F (7, 98) = 8.08, p < .0001, ε = .59) but was marginally significant for its amplitude ( F (7, 98) = 2.41, p = .057, ε = .59).
This difference was marginally significant, t (41) = −1.962, p = 0.057, d = −0.350.
In the case of the “KK” lines, knockdown was measured at the wandering larval stage because RNAi flies did not survive to adulthood and was confirmed for three of the genes tested, and was marginally significant for CG32582 (P = 0.057).
The relationship between explanations and condition were marginally significant for 5-year-olds [χ 2 (2) = 5.73, p = 0.057]. “No idea” responses were comparable in both conditions, however, there were more 5-year-olds in the arbitrary condition who referred to wrong explanations than in causal condition and there were more children in causal condition that referred to the “correct explanation” than in the arbitrary condition.
For all the eyes that were analyzed, the success rate at the final visit was 78% for the IVB group and 56% for the control group, which was marginally significant ( P = 0.057 by chi-square test).
Only a marginally significant main effect of prime color was found F (5, 50) = 2.32, p = 0.057, observed 1−β = .697.
The difference between both groups is marginally significant (paired t test, t 19 = −2.0271, p = 0.057, d = −1.039).
Bilingualism had a positive and marginally significant effect on Cognition ( β = 0.050, SE = 0.026, p = 0.057).
The time × condition effect was marginally significant for reactive aggression ( p = 0.057), with more improvement in the MCP group than in the CP group.
Our evaluation of the base V1 Gabor model revealed that it predicted V1 responses quite well and actually exhibited a marginally significant advantage when compared with conv_1 of pretrained AlexNet (mean r = 0.4946 vs. 0.4887), t (165) = 1.92, p = 0.057.
In addition, the interaction between group and valence was marginally significant, F (1, 57) = 3.769, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.062.
We did, however, find a marginally significant relationship between Covid knowledge asymmetry and anxiety, b = .06, SE = .03, 95% CI: [-.002, .12], t (1021) = 1.90, p = .057 (H1D).
However, comparing the efficacy of the combination relative to the efficacy of its separate components, we found that anti CTLA-4 + cisplatin had a marginally significant ( p = 0.057) synergistic effect relative to either anti CTLA-4 or cisplatin alone.
Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated significant effects on food consumption knowledge, food consumption behavior, and QoL domains, including physical, kidney disease-specific, and total QoL scores (p < 0.05), with a marginally significant effect observed for mental health (p = 0.057).
On the average grasp-point variance JA showed marginally significant differences on the memory associated condition ( M = 20.69 cm) compared to healthy controls ( M = 12.78 cm, p = 0.057, t = 1.691; an estimated 94.26% falling below JA’s score) and non-apraxic controls ( M = 12.92 cm, p = 0.055, t = 1.798; an estimated 94.50% falling below JA’s score) controls.
There was however a marginally significant negative correlation between participants’ scores on the non-planning factor of the BIS-11 and accuracy on the causal attribution task, r = −0.229, n = 70, p = 0.057.
In the first MLM, the interaction of maternal cortisol levels with condition on infant cortisol was marginally significant in the ITT ( b = .435, SE = .229, t = 1.91, p = .057) and PP ( b = ‐.601, SE = .311, t = 1.93, p = .055) approaches.