“marginally significant”

Further pairwise comparisons revealed significantly lower AUC for the participant-conducted urine rapid test compared to the blood rapid test ( P =0.002) ( Figure 1B ), marginally significant differences between the staff-conducted urine rapid test and blood rapid test ( P =0.020) ( Figure 1C ), and no significant difference between staff-conducted and participant-conducted urine rapid tests ( P =0.317) ( Figure 1D ).

There was a marginally significant effect on population growth for bacteria exposed to different phage concentrations (KW, df = 2, P < 0.02), suggesting that the encounter rate between bacteria and phage is important in determining the population-level strength of the fission response.

The 2 group×3 stem type ANOVAs on response time to speech stimuli yielded marginally significant main effects of stem-type (F1(2,68) = 4.64, p<.02, F2(2, 29) = 2.20, p<.13).

The per allele effect for TCF7L2 (rs7903146) for affecting blood 25(OH)D concentration was marginally significant Beta ± SE (-0.011, 0.005), P = 0.02, Z score = -2.30, and no association was observed in KCNQ1 (rs2237896) with 25(OH)D concentration Beta ± SE (-0.005, 0.01]), P = 0.26, Z score = -1.18 after adjusting for age, gender, and T2D (Supplementary Table 2 ).

In contrast, the genetic correlation between self-harm phenotypes and chronic pain were relatively weak and either marginally significant or nonsignificant (self-harm ideation: r g [95% CI] = 0.14 [0.05 to 0.22], p = .02; self-harm behavior: r g [95% CI] = 0.13 [0.01 to 0.26], p = .47).

A marginally significant difference ( p = 0.020) was observed in superior epithelial thickness, with males showing a mean of 51.18 μm (SD ± 3.32 μm) compared to 50.34 μm (SD ± 2.73 μm) in females.

However, we did find a marginally significant difference in gender, with slightly more boys missing data (N = 102) compared to girls (N = 95), p = 0.02.

Another study involving the same participants showed a marginally significant association between excessive polypharmacy and prolonged hospital stay (parameter estimate = 0.20; R 2 value = 0.01; p ‐value = 0.02) (Jeong et al. 2018 ).

Time was found marginally significant, where T2 score ( M = 3.77, SE = 0.05) was slightly lower than baseline ( M = 3.89, SE = 0.04; p = 0.02) and T1 ( M = 3.91, SE = 0.05; p = 0.001).

To test for OXT administration effects on ratings, pairwise comparisons showed a marginally significant effect for ratings of neutral images ( Z = −2.32, p = .02), which did not survive the threshold of .009, with lower ratings after OXT ( M = 1.003, SD = 0.90) compared to placebo ( M = 1.25, SD = 0.88).

The MANOVA showed only a marginally significant difference between the planes for PC1 ( p = 0.0206) but statistically reliable difference between the planes for PC2 and PC3 ( p < 0.01).

Supportive PTA had a marginally significant positive association with BI ( β = 0.126, p = 0.021).

ovata populations was marginally significant ( p = 0.021) but not significant in E. pauciflora ( p = 0.152).

However, the scalar model showed a slight decrease in model fit (scalar: CFI = 0.942, RMSEA = 0.048, SRMR = 0.049), with a marginally significant chi-square difference test ( p = 0.021).

The proportional hazards assumption was satisfied for the OS model (global Schoenfeld test p = 0.55) and marginally significant for the DFS model (p = 0.021), with no substantial time-dependent trends observed in individual plots (Fig.

reported a marginally significant association between histological subtype and marital status in their univariate analysis ( p = 0.021), but this link was subsequently contradicted by their multivariate analysis revealing marital status as an independent predictor of mortality [ 7 ].

The main difference was sex differences in inbreeding depression were more noticeable, as the meta‐regression of sex was significant, opposed to marginally significant ( Q m = 5.31, df = 1, p = 0.021, R 2 = 1.63%; females estimate [95% CI] = 0.39 [0.15; 0.63]; males estimate [95% CI] = 0.27 [0.04; 0.51]; Supplementary Section 14 ).

Notably, the predominance of OTU000018 increased during the experiment although the change was marginally significant ( p = 0.021). 3.6.

S1 ) indicated only a marginally significant difference, 84.3% with PHA(L) of <0.839 and 52.9% with PHA(L) of ≥0.893 ( P = 0.021).

A marginally significant correlation is also found between MLO SCA and PDSI NA ( r = 0.42, p ‐value = 0.021).

Correlations of R × G were only significant for the Saline River and marginally significant for the Little River (Mantel's r = 0.151, P = 0.021 for the Saline River; r = 0.772, P = 0.057 for the Little River; Fig. 6A and D ).

Serum Treatment Predicts Sperm Performance in Follicular Fluid Sperm parameters measured after serum treatment predicted respective sperm traits in follicular fluid treatment at all time points except hyperactivation at 60 min, but also this association was marginally significant (VCL 60 min: F = 5.391, p = 0.021, VCL 180 min: F = 9.402, p = 0.003, VCL 300 min: F = 9.804, p = 0.002; HA 60 min: χ 2 = 3.388, p = 0.066; HA 180 min: χ 2 = 5.802, p = 0.016; HA 300 min: χ 2 = 13.225, p < 0.001, Table 2 and Table S7 ).

However, results suggest significant effects of housing conditions ( B = 0.191; p = 0.003) and marginally significant effects of training exposure (middle exposure: B = 0.4952; p = 0.0217) on cognitive trajectories.

Differences between the most recent pre-pandemic assessments and the latest sweeps (ages 50/64.5 in NCDS/58 and 46/52.5 in BCS/70) were not significant in NCDS/58 (B prepandemic_time_NCDS/58 = 0.01 [−0.07, 0.09], p = 0.791) and marginally significant and negative in BCS/70 (B prepandemic_time_BCS/70 = −0.08 [−0.15, −0.01], p = 0.022), in line with the notion of a “bounce back” to (or even slight improvement compared to) pre-pandemic levels.

In these patients there was improvement in and pain perception ( p = 0.006), and also a marginally significant improvement in elbow flexion ( p = 0.022) and the perimeter of the arm ( p = 0.050).