“marginally significant”

When we performed the PCA analysis separately for the two periods, we still observed a significant divergence among tissues during development (⍴=0.95, p=0.0008) and observed a marginally significant convergence during ageing (⍴=-0.64, p=0.0596).

<0.1 We found that interaction between language and word entropy both for acoustic and phonemic features which were marginally significant (p=0.0596 for phonemic features and p=0.056 for acoustic features).

Mangrove sediment samples showed a similar pattern to the seagrass meadows and the presence of allochthonous sources had a marginally significant positive effect on the amount of CaCO 3 in the sediment ( t -value = 4.29, df = 1.81, p = 0.0596).

The difference between the diabetic control and the 1% OPE treated group was marginally significant at time points 60 min ( P = 0.0597).

The moderation by sex was marginally significant ( p = 0.0597), suggesting a possible difference between men and women regarding the association between VAI and BES score.

Post-hoc comparisons showed a marginally significant change for the Washout group ( t = 3.00, p = 0.0598, Bonferroni-corrected), and a strongly significant effect following time ( t = 6.23, p < 0.001).

In intermittent noise, linking the AGCs reduced the SRT by 2.0 dB and was marginally significant after correction for multiple comparisons, t (9) = 3, p = .0598 after Tukey–Kramer adjustment).

There was a main effect of fructose on expression of both Murf-1 ( F (1, 19) = 12.181, p = 0.00245) and MAFBx ( F (1, 17) = 4.897, p = 0.0409) and a marginally significant interaction between exercise and fructose on expression of Murf-1 ( F (1, 19) = 4.000, p = 0.05999).

They were also more likely than controls to be obese or underweight prior to pregnancy, though the association with obesity was marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

Regarding insurance status, a marginally significant association was identified (F = 3.14, p = 0.06).

Indeed, the slope of the association between global affect reactivity and milk cortisone for the women with the highest quartile of mental health symptoms was not significant ( p = 0.46), while the slope of the women with the lowest quartile of mental health symptoms was marginally significant ( p = 0.06). 3.2.3 Exploratory Analyses Exploratory analyses demonstrated that participants in the stressor group had a significantly higher CC‐ratio compared to the control group (Figure 4 and Table S2 ).

Marginally significant improvements were recorded in the 1MinSTST, with scores increasing from 60.2% to 78.2% ( p = 0.06).

Hypertension in the very elderly trial (HYVET) post hoc analysis showed that frail older individuals could benefit from antihypertensive treatment compared with placebo ( 24 ), and the SPRINT subgroup study showed that older adults ≥ 75 years of age could benefit from intensive antihypertensive therapy compared with standard treatment, regardless of whether they were frail, albeit marginally significant ( P = 0.06).

Taxonomic diversity We found a marginally significant difference in species richness between MPAs and associated reference sites (ANOVA: F 1,102 = 12.00, p = 0.06), with higher richness inside MPAs across all years (Fig. 2 a).

Serum 3α-diol content was also higher in males that were admitted to the ICU than in males that were not admitted and was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that the difference between the overall survival curves of the three groups was marginally significant ( P =0.060; Fig. 4 ).

The mean difference between evaluations of fairness in the PJ ( M = 1.93, SD = 1.03) and no PJ condition ( M = 1.46, SD = 0.60) was marginally significant, F (43) = 3.62, MSE = 0.69, p = 0.06, η 2 = . 08 .

The BMI increased significantly over time in the control group ( p < 0.05); the BMI increase in the intervention group was marginally significant ( p < 0.06).

2 B, the group main effect is marginally significant [ F (1,76) = 3.65, p = 0.06, η2p = 0.05].

Time from PCa diagnosis to MDT was marginally significant ( p = 0.06) with a hazard ratio of 0.99.

However, when measuring differences in the CHO intake between genders in each climbing level, marginally significant differences were found in the intermediate ( p = 0.06; Z = −1.88) and the elite ( p = 0.06; Z = −1.88) group, with no significance in the advanced group ( p = 0.13; Z = −1.50) The dietary intake of macro and micronutrients of male and female climbers on different climbing levels is presented in Table 4 .

The first five RDA axes were significant (ANOVA, p < 0.05), and RDA6 was marginally significant (ANOVA, p = 0.06) so we retained the first six axes (Figures 3a and S5 ), which cumulatively captured 88% of the total explained genetic variance (Table S5 ).

Notably, the main effect of trialwise preference remained marginally significant when an additional variable representing the general preference (see below) was additionally included in the model ( p = 0.06).

After adjustment for age, sex and diabetes mellitus as well as laboratory and dialysis‐related variables, the risk for all‐cause mortality remained significant in the moderate weight loss group (aHR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.07–2.95; p = 0.03) and was marginally significant in the moderate weight gain group (aHR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.96–5.13; p = 0.06).

Additionally, using a co-dominant model for GSTP1 , although the interaction between GSTP1 and GSTM1 was marginally significant (overall interaction p = 0.06), we found that among children with GSTM1 DD genotype, the odds of having a detectable BAlC in children with the GSTP1 Val/Val genotype was 0.20 times (or 1/5 times) that of those with the Ile/Ile genotype [OR (95% CI) = 0.20 (0.05, 0.82), p = 0.03].