“marginally significant”

Line 406 p = .054 is defined as marginally significant; Line 419 p =.06 is defined as non-significant. 12.

Group × bone × site interactions BR is the only variable that demonstrated a marginally significant ( p = .06) group × bone × site interaction, where the DMPN&CN's distal site BR on the fifth metatarsal averaged 4.5 (highest), resulting in the lowest resistance to fracture (Fig. 2 ).

Also, there was a marginally significant difference for intake of fish ( p = 0.06) and low-fat dairy ( p = 0.07).

The percentage of patients experiencing a partial response or better was 55·2% and 67·1% of non‐ASCT and ASCT patients, respectively, a marginally significant difference (chi‐square P = 0·06; Figure S1 ).

Comparison between pulses revealed that survival of beetles from high complexity landscape (HC) was 23% higher after the second pulse compared to the first, but the observed difference was marginally significant (t-ratio = 1.861, df = 166, p = 0.06).

There was also a marginally significant variation in copper intake ( P =0.06).

The accuracy score analysis revealed a marginally significant improvement ( p = 0.06) for T3 identification in bimodal condition over the CI alone condition.

However, the interaction cold-sensitive skeletal muscle 18 F-FDG uptake × time elapsed after meal consumption did have a marginally significant influence on these appetite-related sensations ( P = 0.06; Supplemental Table 1 ).

The marginal effect of time was driven by slightly better detection for changes that occurred after 500 ms (coinciding with trajectory changes in that condition, but note that there was no interaction) than those that occur shortly before, an effect that was marginally significant ( t (14) = 2.05, p = 0.06, d’ = 0.53), opposite to the behavioral cost associated with resetting.

and retained important independent variables such as directly asking patients about DA etc. DA screening practice was significantly associated with gender (AOR = 0.46, P = 0.037), place of work (AOR = 3.68, P = 0.039), and interest in continuing education courses (AOR = 3.21, P = 0.015) whereas directly asking patient about DA was a marginally significant factor in the study (AOR = 2.20, P = 0.060) ( Table 3 ).

The difference in these linear trends was marginally significant ( P = .06).

However, the difference of MFS was marginally significant between AYA PV and non-AYA PV (median MFS: 12.4 years vs. 15.7 years, p=0.06).

Closer inspection by the Mann–Whitney-U test for the comparison of only two independent groups indicated that the difference in the compatibility effect was significant between neglect patients and healthy controls ( p < .05, Z = 2.33) and marginally significant between neglect patients and patient controls ( p = .06, Z = 1.9), whereas, it did not differ between the two control groups ( p = .87, Z = 0.4).

However, statistical analysis of the data revealed that T4-mediated cell motility is marginally significant ( P ≤0.06).

Additionally, we performed subgroup analysis according to specific TAs and found that the use of anti-VEGF agents significantly improved PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69–0.96, P =0.012) and a marginally significant PFS benefits for anti-EGFR agents (HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79–1.01, P =0.06).

The cultural Group × Video target interaction was marginally significant, F (1, 84) = 3.80, p = .06, η p 2 = .04.

However, the effects of elevation on the assemblage composition were marginally significant in models containing number of trees (P = 0.06) and soil clay content (P = 0.07) as independent variables.

Median levels of total cholesterol (p = 0.23), LDL (p = 0.71), and triglyceride (p = 0.41) were not significantly different between baseline and 24 weeks, and HDL showed a marginally significant change (p = 0.06).

Taxon was marginally significant ( P = 0.06; Table 5 ) and R. argentea exhibited a slightly lower CT Max (36.01 ± 0.17 °C; mean ± SE) than B. sadleri (37.60 ± 0.09 °C; mean ± SE) and haplochromine cichlid juveniles (37.81 ± 0.22 °C; mean ± SE) ( Fig. 3A ; Table 5 ).

r = .125 was, however, marginally significant ( p = .06) and in the predicted direction.

Conversely, when the multifrequency background pattern was presented at 20% contrast for the lowest spatial frequency target of 0.25 cyc/deg (complexity levels 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Table 2 ), contrast sensitivity was lower, being marginally significant [ t (21) = −1.99, p = 0.06], which is expected because at 20% contrast, the background activates parvocellular neurons more than magnocellular neurons (Kaplan and Shapley, 1986 ), making the task more difficult.

For the long-term memory outcome ( Figure 2 ), there was a marginally significant main effect for condition, F (2, 38) = 2.89, P = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.13.

We tested whether the significant predictors could provide any complimentary information to clinical stage of T4/N3 and the sum of all nodal GTVs at 2 weeks for prediction of DF, and found that neither total TV BV , nor mean and max SUV, nor total TLG of all nodal tumors had a p < 0.3, and only TV BV of primary tumors at 2 weeks showed marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

Additionally, 13‐s lagged neural synchrony showed a marginally significant negative association with externalizing problems at T1 ( r = −0.34, p = 0.06) and a significant negative association at T2 ( r = −0.56, p = 0.02).

The difference between trials following a nongamble and trials following a gambled win was marginally significant (two-tailed p = .06; one-tailed: p = .03).