Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
In general, women attributed greater importance to each motivation than did men, with some exceptions: men and women rated wanting both to improve health and look good for a significant other similarly (p = .11 and .42, respectively), and men assigned greater importance to attracting a significant other—although this difference was marginally significant (3.19 vs. 2.70, p = .06).
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
Self-control was also a marginally significant predictor, F (1,58) = 3.62, p = .06, η 2 = .06.
Corrigendum.
Health Psychol Open · 2016 · PMC5193316
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Using Pillai’s trace, the multivariate statistics revealed a main effect of WTC on cognitive functioning, F (3,31) = 3.32, p = 0.03, η 2 = 0.24, as well as a marginally significant interaction between WTC and leisure time activity, F (3,31) = 2.79, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.21, but no main effect of leisure-time activity, F (3,31) = 1.48, p = 0.24, η 2 = 0.13, and voluntariness in WTC, F (3,31) = 2.03, p = 0.13, η 2 = 0.16.
marginally significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Results: comparison of parameters between two groups after intervention showed that TG and TC concentrations decreased more in participants who consumed yogurt plus shallot than who consumed yogurt ( P = 0.003 and P = 0.04, respectively), also LDL-C level of participants who were in yogurt plus shallot group was lower than that of participants in yogurt group, but this difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.06).
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
As shown in Table 2 , among the eight indicators of PYD attributes, apart from SC that did not have significant changes across four waves ( F (3, 1299) = 1.07, p = .36) and SE that showed marginally significant changes ( F (3, 1299) = 2.47, p = .06, η 2 p = .01), other six measures (i.e., RE, EC, CC, BC, MC, SD) all demonstrated significant changes over time with partial effective size ranging between .01 and .02.