“marginally significant”

For the 600–800 ms time window, a positive cluster over the left-frontal electrodes was marginally significant (cluster p = 0.06, electrodes Fp1, F7, F3, and FC5).

However, in the multivariable analysis tumor gene number was not significant and ctDNA gene number was marginally significant (HR=1.08, P =0.06).

The mean difference between evaluations of fairness in the PJ ( M = 1.93, SD = 1.03) and no PJ condition ( M = 1.46, SD = 0.60) was marginally significant, F (43) = 3.62, MSE = 0.69, p = 0.06, η 2 = . 08 .

The number of osteomyelitis-related hospitalizations showed a marginally significant positive association ( β = 0.237, OR = 1.268, 95%CI: 0.990 ~ 1.623, p = 0.060), suggesting that increased hospitalizations might contribute to attitude formation, though it did not reach statistical significance.

elegans eggs between early and middle development, and a marginally significant 11% increase ( p = .06) between middle and late development eggs (Figure 5 ).

Regression analysis with age and culture as predictors of number of acquired skills in prone, showed that age is only a marginally significant predictor of number of skills (β = 0.10, p = 0.06, R 2 = 0.01) while culture significantly predicts the number of skills and significantly adds to the explained variance of age (β = 0.18, p < 0.001, Δ R 2 = 0.03).

Additionally, social capital was a significant predictor of increased odds of teen parenting for Latino youth and marginally significant ( p < 0.06) for female and male youth).

In one phase of their task, the FRN measure showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.06) positive association with extraversion (specifically a measure of agentic extraversion) amongst participants given a placebo.

The interactive effect of valence and electrode zone was significant, [ F (4, 140) = 4.43, p = 0.03, η 2 p = 0.11], indicating that the difference between TiN and TiP is significant in the central-parietal and parietal areas ( p = 0.003, p = 0.002), marginally significant in the central area ( p = 0.06), but not in the frontal and frontal-central areas.

The contingency table analysis showed a marginally significant difference between infection by species ( p = 0.06), and no significant effects of dose, or species by dose interaction ( Table 1 ).

In particular, the SNP pair of rs11892646 and rs56219526 was marginally significant after multiple testing adjustments ( p ‐value = .06).

No polymorphism showed association with bladder cancer risk at the 5% significance level, although individuals carrying the 280His variant allele had a marginally significant increased risk of bladder TCC compared to those carrying the homozygote wildtype genotype (adjusted OR [95% CI], 1.50 [0.98–2.28], p = 0.06).

The result was also marginally significant (p=0.06).

Assessing whether the correlations of the MM and the control groups were significantly different, we found the intergroup correlation coefficient difference to be marginally significant [two-tailed z = 1.88, P = 0.060, same statistical results for both the resting state variance and task peak-to-peak activity analyses].

Factors Impacting Gene Flow The Mantel test was significant only for the relationship between the genetic distance and the connectivity of sites by water flow ( r = 0.33, p = 0.003) and marginally significant for water type ( r = 0.16, p = 0.06), but neither for the geographic distance nor for the Euclidean distance of environmental parameters (Figure 4 ).

Health self-efficacy improvement from baseline to 3 months was significant among younger participants in the intervention (p<.05) but not the control arm (p=.54) (d=.20) and marginally significant among older survivors (age 60+) in intervention (p=.06) but not the control arm (p=.58) (d=.28).

The differences seemed fairly small and did not reach statistical significance, excepting a marginally significant difference in the estimated relations of social and emotional intelligences with visuospatial processing ( r = 0.29 versus r = 0.17, respectively, p = 0.06).

The effect of time-varying pubertal status was marginally significant: a one-unit (between person) increase on the pubertal status scale corresponded to an average contemporaneous reduction in %MVPA of about 0.83% (p = 0.06).

The higher percentage of tetracycline-resistant isolates observed in down-gradient surface water samples was marginally significant ( p = 0.06) ( Table 6 ).

A marginally significant Group×Block interaction during acquisition, F (2, 108) = 2.8, p = .06, η 2 = .05, ε = .79, supported a learning effect.

There was a marginally significant interaction, F(1, 183) = 3.52, p = 0.06, d = 0.28.

However, the effect of illnesses per year was robust enough to give a marginally significant (p = 0.06) rank correlation before the removal of outliers.

At the end of 24 weeks, 29 (67%; 95% CI 53% to 80%) in the Ca+D group and 11 (44%; 95% CI 27% to 63%) in the Ca group achieved the primary combined outcome of radiographic and alkaline phosphatase endpoints, and this difference was marginally significant (p=0.06).

The intervention had a significant positive effect on PIs’ intention to consume more water (mean pre = 3.46, SE = 0.09; mean post = 3.65, SE = 0.11; t (40) = −2.48; p = 0.02), and a marginally significant positive effect on their intention to consume less SSB (mean pre = 3.02, SE = 0.12; mean post = 3.31, SE = 0.12; t (40) = −1.93; p = 0.06). 4.

Among individuals with skin lesions, we found a significant association of CC16 with urinary As (β = −0.13, p = 0.01) and a marginally significant association of CC16 with CAI (β = −0.04, p = 0.06).