“marginally significant”

But the searching slope for Chinese subjects was steeper than that for Black subjects, with a marginally significant interaction of Set size and Race of participant, F (2, 82) = 2.93, p = .06, η p 2 = .07.

Additionally, mothers with lower education levels consumed more alcohol than those with higher education levels, but this association was marginally significant (12.2% vs. 6.2%, respectively; p = 0.06). 3.2.

However, marginally significant lower levels of vitamin D were noted when two or more variables were present compared with none of the variables (23±11 vs 25±11 ng/mL; P =0.06) ( Table 3 ).

In fact, we observed marginally significant ( p = 0.06, Student's t -test for case 1 ) and significant ( p = 0.009) preference bias in gaze for the last half second and for the half second after the decision timing, respectively.

Baseline IL-6 was a marginally significant factor ( F 2,488 = 2.70, p = 0.06) suggesting greater reactivity in individuals with lower baseline IL-6 levels compared to those with higher levels at 75 min ( p = 0.02) but not at 45 min post-stress ( p = 0.16).

For ARI, care seeking from a recommended provider (a health facility) was significantly lower in the third (OR = 0.08, P = 0.004) and fourth (OR = 0.07, P = 0.01) quartiles in the univariable model, marginally lower in the fourth quartile (AOR = 0.05, P = 0.05) in the full model, and marginally significant for trend across distance quartiles ( P = 0.06).

Pairwise comparison of groups (Wilcoxon tests with Holm correction) revealed that the difference attributed to Picraminaceae was significant ( p -value ≪0.05) or marginally significant ( p -value = 0.06) with an exception of Aronia ( p -value = 0.20).

When family therapy was compared with another psychological or behavioural therapy, the effect was marginally significant in two studies with community participants, with [SMD = −2.45, 95% CI (−4.98, 0.09), p = 0.06].

For the lower part of the stem (below 2 m), statistically significant differences in relative volume growth were observed based on the length of the bark stripping scars ( p = 0.02); however, in the case of full stem volume and the upper section of the tree, the differences were marginally significant ( p ≥ 0.06–0.09).

Lastly, two-pollutant models did not show significant associations between a pollutant with birthweight outcomes in trimester-averaged models (SI Table S5 ), only NO 2 exposure during second trimester demonstrated a marginally significant association with SGA (OR = 1.13 per 10 μg/m 3 increase, p = 0.06).

More interestingly, the Proposed solution x Group interaction was marginally significant [ F (1.32) = 3.69, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0 . 10 ].

Finally, the ANOVA revealed a marginally significant interaction between cue validity and SOA, F (1, 23) = 3.79, p = 0.06, reflecting the observation that at the 300 ms SOA cued targets ( M = 431 ms) were responded to faster than uncued targets ( M = 442 ms), but at the 1000 ms SOA, the trend was in the opposite direction, with slightly faster location of uncued targets ( M = 415 ms) than cued targets ( M = 418 ms).

The interaction between group and electrode was marginally significant ( F (48,1392) = 2.42, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.08).

In female hippocampus, Pb exposure significantly decreased NDR1/2 expression at PND30 (control, 1.480±0.020; Pb exposure, 1.077±0.096, F(1,6) = 16.899, P<0.01, n = 8), PND90 (control, 1.541±0.035; Pb exposure, 1.215±0.080, F(1,6) = 14.000, P<0.01, n = 8), and induced marginally significant decrease at PND60 (control, 1.355±0.080; Pb exposure, 1.105±0.111, F(1,6) = 3.358, P = 0.06, n = 8) ( Fig 7C ).

The direct effects of growth mindset on psychological well-being and school engagement in this group are marginally significant ( p = 0.060 and p = 0.054, respectively).

3b , middle) revealed only a marginally significant effect of reward (F(2, 78) = 2.92, p = 0.060, η p 2 = 0.070).

Lower levels of blood lactate after aerobic exercise indicated an enhanced physical recovery, although the change was marginally significant in men (P = 0.06).

More traditional GRS beliefs were associated with higher centrality ( B = 0.38, p = 0.01, Δ R 2 = 0.06), and the interaction term was marginally significant ( B = −0.50, p = 0.06, Δ R 2 = 0.05), suggesting a potential moderating effect.

For the middle vMMN (150–300 ms), the interaction of Expression × ROI was marginally significant ( F (1,34) = 4.6, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.13), whereby the occipito-temporal areas had more negative vMMN than the frontal areas in the happy condition ( p < 0.01).

The Trees & Bio group saw a marginally significant improvement over the No GI group ( p = 0.06).

The personal importance participants attached to rationality (IRS) had only a marginally significant effect on willingness to volunteer, b = 0.27, SE = 0.15, t (281) = 1.86, p = .06.

A marginally significant interaction between Night and Condition (F1, 28 = 3.7; p = 0.06) was not supported by Tukey’s post-hoc comparisons (RS group: N-2 = 8h15min ± 1h05min, N-1 = 7h38min ± 1h18min, SD group: N-2 = 7h58 ± 59min, N-1 = 8h11min ± 1h13min, all ps > 0.23).

In addition, the effect of LC on OS was found to be marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

A two‐way MANOVA revealed a medium framing by sex interaction effect ( η 2 p = 0.112) that was marginally significant (Pillai's trace = 0.112, F (6,99) = 2.08, p = 0.06).

A marginally significant association was found between the presence of the SDF-1 (c801A) allele and the development of PDR ( n = 89 eyes, p = 0.06).