“marginally significant”

While there was no significant effect of age ( β = −0.070, p = 0.624), there was a marginally significant age × culture interaction ( β = −0.270, p = 0.061), indicating that developmental changes in context sensitivity differed across cultural contexts.

The relationship between family structure and academic achievement is marginally significant ( χ 2 = 5.598, df = 2, p = 0.061).

Although IDH1 and ATRX mutation positivity was not significantly associated to the methylation profile of SFRP1 , all mutated cases had strong LEF1 and TCF1 expression levels, and for TCF1 this association was marginally significant (Pearson χ 2 = 4.950; P = 0.061).

Having previous health education regarding DS was associated with higher a MHS (2.27 units higher); however, the relationship is marginally significant (p = 0.061).

In multivariate model 1 comprising sociodemographic factors, the association between composite SES score and T2DM was marginally significant (type 3 p=0.061).

However, the elevation of hs-cTnI was marginally significant ( p = 0.061) on admission, although hs-cTnI levels were confirmed to be significantly elevated in all patients with cardiac injury during their hospitalization.

Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that the percentage of infant‐object interaction bouts in which parents exhibited multimodal joint engagement at 12 months was a marginally significant and positive predictor of their cognitive composite scores at 30 months after adjustment, F (4, 11) = 1.66, p = 0.061, Adjusted R 2 = 0.15; B = 51.34, 95%CI [−2.84, 105.53] (see Table 4 ). 3.5.

Results The results of the analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of the label, b = 0.17, se = 0.09, Z = 1.87, p = .061, a significant main effect of medical diagnosis, b = 0.20, se = 0.09, Z = 2.16, p = .031, and a reliable significant interaction between the two manipulations, b = −0.35, se = 0.09, Z = −3.78, p <.001.

There was a marginally significant main effect of action, F (1,23) = 3.88, p = .061, η 2 p = .14.

The predicted mean change was larger than the empirical change across participants on a marginally significant level ( T (9) = −2.14, p = 0.061), despite the small sample (see Figure 3b ).

The association between gender was marginally significant (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 0.98–3.03, p = 0.061).

The main effect of sleep state was marginally significant [F (1, 26) = 3.828, p = 0.061, η 2 p = 0.128], and stop-accuracy decreased after sleep deprivation.

However, we found a significant main effect of task (F 1, 15 = 6.66, p=0.021) and a marginally significant interaction between the stimulation and task (F 1, 15 = 4.06, p=0.061).

There was a marginally significant negative correlation between these two measures over the midcentral region ( r s = .335, p = .061), indicating that the reduction in reported memory intrusions was reflected in a reduction in the NSW.

Exploratory behavior in the novel tank test A t -test for independent means indicated a marginally significant effect of chronic unpredictable stress for the number of entries to the top zone ( t (48) = − 1.920, p = 0.061; CUS < untreated), a significant effect on the total time spent in the top zone ( t (48) = − 2.129, p = 0.038; CUS < untreated), but no significant difference in the distance traveled in the top zone ( t (48) = − 1.309, p = 0.197; Table 2 ).

Variation in dissatisfaction rate by household financial status was marginally significant ( P = 0.061) while that by current age ( P = 0.802), gender ( P = 0.570), ethnicity ( P = 0.110), daily per capita income of the household ( P = 0.890), time since surgery ( P = 0.838), and IOL surgery ( P = 0.632) were not significant.

The interaction between emotion and category was marginally significant (F(4,116) = 2.33, p = .061, η 2 = .08).

Furthermore, central to our hypothesis, a marginally significant Load × Group interaction effect was found, F (2, 27) = 3.1, p = 0.061 (see Figure 3 ).

Among the top-ranked genes identified in the discovery stage, marginally significant associations were observed for MYO5B ( P = 0.061, promoter/enhancer) and AUTS2 ( P = 0.089, synonymous) in the replication stage.

Regarding the benefits of PEB, there was a marginally significant interaction effect between pro-environmental attitude and type of estimation ( b = −0.02 CI 95% [−0.03, 0.00], p = 0.061; model statistics: F (2819) = 3.13, p = 0.025).

Marginally significant correlations were found between n Ach and lower residualized post-task cortisol ( r = −.50, p = .061) in the negative feedback condition, and between n Ach and higher residualized post-task cortisol ( r = .54, p = .060) in the no feedback condition.

Results After adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, total energy intake, economic status, education, supplement intake, age of starting obesity, and history of body mass loss, a marginally significant negative association was observed between the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA–IR) and the DQI–I (β: −0.015, 95% CI: −0.03, 0.000; p = 0.061).

Across the two offline intervals, there was a marginally significant trend for a time point effect ( F (2,52) = 2.96, P = 0.061, ɳ 2 = 0.10) but a significant effect of group ( F (1,26) = 4.80, P = 0.038, ɳ 2 = 0.16).

The cumulative survival rates in the frailty group were lower than those in the non-frailty group, although the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.061).

In addition, there was a marginally significant trend for exposure to lower temperatures to further reduce survival ( F 1,382 =3.5, P =0.061).