zebrina showed a marginally significant difference between genetic groups at 20°C, with genetic group one displaying a lower metabolic rate than group 2 ( p = 0.068) (Figure 4 , bottom panels). 3.5.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
As Figure 6 shows, the pooled correlation in this dataset is r = −.31 (95% CI [−.57, .02], for the random-effects model), which is marginally significant ( z = −1.83, p = .068).
Results A marginally significant difference in the physiological cost index when using the two support products, where it tends to be lower with the use of AK (Z = -1,82; p = 0,068).
However, we found a marginally significant interaction between gender of participant and experimental condition on aesthetic appreciation, F = 3.35, p = 0.068, η 2 = 0.004.
Multiple testing of the mean angle in the supralateral sector, which was statistically significant, between PSD, fellow, and controls showed a significant difference between fellow and control and a marginally significant difference between PSD and controls (PSD vs. control; P = 0.068, PSD vs. fellow; P = 0.652, fellow vs. control; P = 0.011, Steel-Dwass test).
Comparison of data from high-pass VA found a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.068), specifically with 0.21 ± 0.08 logMAR for the MVF-preserved group and 0.24 ± 0.10 logMAR for the MVF-damaged group.
Familiar operating rooms (>10% of a surgeon’s case volume) also tended to increase vagal tone, though this was marginally significant [β=0.098 (−0.007 to 0.203), P =0.068].
We also found a marginally significant three‐way interaction between tree species identity, water treatment, and inoculation treatment on leaf number (χ 2 3,298 = 7.14, p = 0.068), suggesting that how foliar growth responds to inoculation in a general sense (i.e., regardless of composition of the inoculum) depends on water regime.
Moreover, there was a marginally significant total effect between materialism and conflict, β = .10, p = .068, 95% CI [−.01, .20], and a significant mediation effect, β = .03, p = .017, 95% CI [.01, .06].
The results revealed a marginally significant main effect of coordinate system, F (1, 11) = 4.09, p = 0.068, .
Differences in systemic inflammatory markers based on surgery type Surgery type accounted for marginally significant differences in post-surgical plasma IL-6 concentrations (tested using ANCOVA) ( F (2,11) = 3.47, p = 0.068, Fig. 2a ), but not TNF-α ( p = 0.38, Fig. 2b ).
This difference between the two tasks was marginally significant (t(34) = 1.885, p = 0.068, η 2 = .095).
Elithorn’s Mazes score positively predicted CELF 4 score in the quiet condition with no visual support, β = 0.012, t = 2.525, p = 0.012; however, there was a marginally significant negative interaction effect between EM and the CELF 4 score in the multi-talker babble noise, β = −0.011, t = −1.837, p = 0.068, indicating that the link between EM and CELF 4 score was weakened in the presence of noise.
Accurate responses were significantly faster for good images than bad images (892 ms and 1028 ms respectively; t(8) = 8.82, p <0.001), and this effect was significant across all the categories (t(8) = 8.53, p <0.001 for beaches; t(8) = 6.27, p <0.001 for forests; t(8) = 4.42, p <0.01 for highways; t(8) = 5.2, p <0.001 for mountains and t(8) = 2.58, p <0.05 for offices) except for city streets in which the difference was marginally significant (t(8) = 2.10, p = 0.068).
A marginally significant main effect of time was found for the interval subtest [ F (2,16) = 3.19, p = 0.068].
Positive Emotions (M1) interacting with Subjective Age (V) had a marginally significant positive effect on T2 Life Satisfaction (B= 0.075, SE= 0.041, 95% CI [−0.005;.154], p =0.068), suggesting tentative support for hypothesis H3b.
After adjusting for gender, age, marital status, education level, self-reported psychiatric diagnosis, and COVID-19 wave, the direct effect of FCV-19S on PHQ-9 was rendered marginally significant ( β = 0.098, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.20], p = 0.068; S1 Table ).
A similar marginally significant two-way interaction emerged when comparing the control video with the porn baseline , B = 74.60, t (23427) = 1.824, p = 0.068, 95% CI: −5.569, 154.772.
A marginally significant correlation between fT3 levels and BARD scores in patients of > 65 years was observed ( P = 0.068).
Biogeographic patterns of ant genomes After controlling for both spatial autocorrelation and potential phylogenetic patterns, we found a marginally significant, positive correlation between ant assembly size similarity and climate similarity (Mantel R = 0.12, p -value = 0.068).
The interaction effect between electrodes and condition was marginally significant (χ 2 (2) = 4.783, p = 0.068), and the post hoc comparison suggested that the ERP responses evoked by aspect violation sentences were larger than those evoked by correct sentences at PZ (β = 2.038, SE = 1.227, z = 2.362, p = 0.017).
Reaction time (RT) analysis The 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of Event Congruence, F (1, 19) = 3.753, p = .068, η p 2 = 0.165, with shorter RTs in the event-related ( M = 523 ms, SE = 18 ms) versus event-unrelated condition (536 ms, SE = 17 ms).
The RCS analysis revealed a link between a higher LN count and a better DFS ( P = 0.007), and there was a marginally significant trend suggesting a potential link between a higher LN count and an improved OS ( P = 0.068).
Moreover, differences in richness of typical grassland species among treatment were recorded, even if marginally significant (F = 5.69, p = 0.068).
Pairwise comparisons of native versus non-native stimuli for each combination of Feature, Group, and Time showed only one marginally significant effect: for Mandarin speakers, phoneme features in the late interval exhibited earlier peak times for native language stimuli ( t (324) = –1.83, p = 0.068).