faecium , there was a marginally significant difference, with males being more resistant ( F = 3.36, d.f. = 1, 83, P = 0.070).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
We detected a marginally significant increase in iron content after the administration of an iron diet (ANOVA, F 1,14 = 3.70, p = 0.07), which ranged from 27.39±0.95 (mean±SE in nmol of iron/mg of protein) to 29.34±1.04 for symbiotic females, and from 27.99±1.24 to 29.92±0.50 for aposymbiotic ones.
The reduction in the number of emergency and elective surgeries for specialties other than general surgery were higher than general surgery residents and the observed difference was marginally significant (P = 0.07 and P = 0.02 respectively).
Only the simple slope for Vietnamese American female spouses was significant ( b ( SE ) = 0.73 (0.25), t = 2.92, p = .01), although the simple slope for Vietnamese American male spouses was marginally significant ( b ( SE ) = −0.40 (0.20), t = 2.02, p = .07).
We nevertheless observed a marginally significant correlation between days to flowering and silique number within the experimental populations of planting 3 (Spearman r = 0.29, p = 0.07).
NF was a marginally significant predictor for concrete concepts ( p = 0.07), but not for abstract concepts ( p = 0.28).
Finally, Rank2AfterIncongruent fixations were less positive than Rank3AfterIncongruent fixations [1.16 μV; p < 0.05; main effect of Fixation: F (2, 28) = 3.39; p = 0.05], specifically in the ROI 3, ROI 4 and ROI 6 Fixation by ROI interaction marginally significant [ F (10, 140) = 2.25; p = 0.07], while no significant difference was observed with JustAfterIncongruent fixations.
Compared to emotion words, the difference is marginally significant ( p = . 07 ).
The older adults showed a significant effect for Target Gender (χ 2 = 4.34, df: 1, p < 0.05), and this effect was marginally significant for the fifth-graders (χ 2 = 3.37, df: 1, p = 0.07).
The analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of Target, F (1, 17) = 3.66, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.18; however, we found no significant main effect of Cue, F (1, 17) = 0.75, p = 0.399, η p 2 = 0.04.
There was a marginally significant two-way interaction between experimental condition and EQ, F (2, 58) = 2.87, p = 0.07, ɳ p 2 = 0 . 09 , and a significant three-way interaction between experimental condition, EQ, and region, F (4, 116) = 4.90, p < 0.01, ɳ p 2 = 0 . 14 .
Post hoc analyses with Tukey’s HSD multiple comparisons correction revealed a significant difference between the total word count in letter versus category fluency in controls ( P < 0.001) and (marginally significant) in PSP ( P = 0.07).
Nevertheless, there was a marginally significant relation of the SOT score to the number of choices in response strategy ( estimate = 0.33, t (69) = 1.8, p = 0.07).
When the spatial and memory blocks were contrasted, there were main effects of block [ F (1,10) = 12.6, P < 0.01], precue type [ F (1,10) = 10.0, P < 0.05] and a marginally significant interaction between block and precue [ F (1,10) = 4.1, P = 0.07].
Similarly, multiple imputation results suggested a marginally significant increase in vegetable consumption ( p = 0.07), a decrease in breakfast consumption ( p = 0.09), and an increase in eating fast food (p = 0.05).
The task × force level interaction was marginally significant, F (1,24) = 3.50, p = .07, η p 2 = .127.
More importantly, the overall results also revealed a marginally significant distance × congruence interaction [F (1, 27) = 3.53, p = .07, η 2 partial = .12] and a significant distance × congruence × hemisphere interaction [F (2, 54) = 5.03, p < .05, η 2 partial = .16].
Consistent regression coefficients that were statistically significant or marginally significant at the 0.05 level were shown in 2 of the 38 CpGs in ALPSAC, including one gender-unspecific CpG site cg16460342 ( P2RX4 , p value = 0.07), and one gender-specific CpG, cg14260083 ( RADIL , p value = 0.04).
[ 25 ] found that a marginally significant interaction effect ( F = 3.50, p = .07) was obtained for the Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39) pain score, suggesting an increase of 0.79 (10.53%) points for the MBSR group and a decrease of 0.69 (8.63%) for the usual care group.
However, the interaction between treatment and elapsed time since fire was marginally significant (F 6, 62 = 2.04; P = 0.07) with PBG and GAB treatments displaying consistently lower densities than unburned pastures (Figure 2 D).
On the individual level ( Fig 3 ), all the participants with vowel dyslexia made more vowel errors than the control group, for 16 of them it was significant (for each participant, t (59) > 3.37, p’s < .006, using Crawford & Howell’s [ 42 ], t -test), and for one it was marginally significant ( t (59) = 1.45, p = .07).
There was a marginally significant developmental decrease binding in in the LC and PoO of the rostral pons ( p = 0.07; beta = −0.22 and p = 0.05; beta = −0.24, respectively).
Individuals infected with mange experienced a marginally significant increase in their hazard of mortality with increasing proportions of infected pack-mates (β mange*infected packmates = 0.55, 95% CI: −0.04, 1.14, P = 0.07), whereas healthy individuals appeared unaffected (β infected packmates = −0.21, 95% CI: −0.68, 0.26, P = 0.39) (Fig. 3 ).
The CBM-I training and control groups showed no significant between-group difference in any of the measures at baseline (all p > .05, Table 1 ). Training effects Negative interpretations In terms of negative interpretations of the scenarios, the main effect of time between T1 and T2 was significant ( F (1, 61) = 20.86, p < .001, η p 2 = .26), and the effect of group × time was marginally significant ( F (1, 61) = 3.43, p = .07, η p 2 = .05).
In step 3 models in the BA condition, only change in weight was a marginally significant predictor ( p = .07).