“marginally significant”

We observed that being generally obese in comparison with non-obese increased the risk of CV and all-cause mortality in all glucose tolerance statuses; while considering CVD events, only among individuals with T2DM, the presence of general obesity was associated with marginally significant higher risk [1.19 (0.98–1.43); p-value = 0.07].

The results also revealed a marginally significant Time x Intervention interaction for depression scores, F (1, 56) = 3.41, p = 0.07.

In the multivariate model, gender was marginally significant, with women less likely to report transactional sex than men (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.04–1.14, p = 0.07).

Conversational-1st order resulted in a significant difference in the two speech styles; for learning efficiency, t (23) = 3.60, p = 0.002; immediate memory, t (23) = 2.49, p = 0.021; and marginally significant for delayed memory, t (23) = 1.90, p = 0.07.

In Table 3 , 30.3% of individuals were in low adherence of LCD group and 69.7% were in other groups and it was shown that weight (P = 0.001), height (P = 0.04), BMI (P = 0.04), BFM (P = 0.01), BFP (P = 0.03), FFM (P = 0.03), FMI (P = 0.04), WC (P = 0.03), VFA (P = 0.02), ODP (P = 0.03); were all significant and age was marginally significant (P = 0.07) with LCD status.

There was a significant decrease in the number of patients that were hospitalized due to internalizing disorders from 2019 ( M ± SD = 22.3 ± 9.3 per month) to 2020 ( M ± SD = 16.8 ± 7.7; B = −5.5, 95% CI = −8.0 to −3.0, p = 0.0002) and a marginally significant increase in the number of restraints per month (2019: M ± SD = 2.8 ± 6.8, 2020: M ± SD = 9.0 ± 14.5; Z = −1.96, Rosenthal’s r = 0.36, p = 0.07).

However, at 18 months, mean weight loss was 4.3±1.7 kg in those in the very poor category and 8.2±1.2 kg in those in the poor or better category, with a marginally significant between-group difference (p=0.07).

There was a marginally significant difference in initial sputum culture positivity between the two groups ( P = 0.07), with DM+ being more likely to present with a positive sputum culture.

The association between IGD medicalization awareness and maladaptive cognitions was not significant in the IGD-S subgroup but was statistically significant in the IGD-P12M subgroup (Cohen d =0.24, P =.01), marginally significant in the IGD-PC subgroup (Cohen d= 0.18; P =.07), and significant among all internet gamers (Cohen d =0.18, P =.02).

Follow-up tests showed that the difference between central and noncentral blocks was significant, t (23) = 2.73, p = .01 (one-tailed directional t test: p = .006), 4 Cohen’s d = .55; the differences between central-signal and no-signal blocks, and between no-signal and noncentral blocks were marginally significant; t (23) = 1.91, p = .07 (one-tailed directional t test: p = .035), Cohen’s d = .39, and t (23) = 1.81, p = .08 (one-tailed directional t test: p = .041), Cohen’s d = .37, respectively.

We obtained a marginally significant group by gender interaction, Wilk’s λ = 0.92, F (5,113) = 2.13, p < 0.07, η 2 = 0.09.

Compared with the WT group, a marginally significant difference was detected in TRT (235 ± 6 μm) ( N = 11) in the 5XFAD group ( p = 0.07).

The mean pleasantness ratings for the four sounds identified in the more Positively valenced group were 1.35 points higher than the Negatively valenced group, which was a marginally significant difference [independent samples t (3) = 1.991, p < 0.07, one-tailed].

There was a marginally significant developmental decrease binding in in the LC and PoO of the rostral pons ( p = 0.07; beta = −0.22 and p = 0.05; beta = −0.24, respectively).

Likewise, adding relative risk to a model with only absolute risk improved fit significantly (p<.001), whereas adding absolute risk to a model including relative risk was associated with only a marginally significant improvement in fit (p=.07).

The association with all cancers combined was marginally significant ( P =0.07) and after adjustment for the GINI index was significant for each cancer type except hepatic tumours, the lymphoid leukaemia and Hodgkins disease subtypes, and all cancers combined.

Correlations between the three speech measures and tinnitus awareness and tinnitus impact were not significant at the alpha < 0.05 level (two-tailed distribution), although a marginally significant positive correlation was seen between BKB sentence testing in quiet scores and tinnitus awareness ( r = 0.185, p = 0.07).

Next, when the clinical features of the 84 ESCC cases were stratified by the pathohistological response of the primary lesion to NAC, the distribution of pathological T stage was significantly different between responders and non-responders ( P < 0.0001) whereas the distribution of pathological stage and pretreatment serum CEA value were marginally significant ( P = 0.07, Table 2 ).

We observed that CDPCP treatment resulted in a lower rate of kidney damage in Oct1+/+ mice than in Oct1-/- mice, and the rate difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

The increase in step length for the normal leg was marginally significant ( p = 0.070).

Additionally, boys had an earlier acrophase on A during the school days, but this difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

The interaction between condition and gender was marginally significant [ F (3, 11,521) = 2.357, p = 0.070, η 2 = 0.005].

There was a marginally significant main effect of session for congruent correct (beta(5, 213) = −5.27, t = −1.81, p = 0.07) trials, with a significant effect for incongruent correct trials (beta(5, 213) = −9.57, t = −3.12, p = 0.002), indicating that reaction times decreased over time for the entire sample.

The NBRM predicting IJA_high from group was marginally significant (χ (2) 2 = 5.1, p = .07).

On the individual level ( Fig 3 ), all the participants with vowel dyslexia made more vowel errors than the control group, for 16 of them it was significant (for each participant, t (59) > 3.37, p’s < .006, using Crawford & Howell’s [ 42 ], t -test), and for one it was marginally significant ( t (59) = 1.45, p = .07).