“marginally significant”

Additionally, boys had an earlier acrophase on A during the school days, but this difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

At scan 3, the three-group ANOVA was marginally significant (F 2,22 = 3.1, p = 0.07): the 100 μg R848-treated mice had higher temperatures than the control animals ( p = 0.02) but were not different from the 50 μg R848 treated animals ( p = 0.24); temperature did not distinguish the 50 μg R848-treated and control mice at the third scan ( p = 0.25). 3.2.

After 6 months, the detectable rate decreased to 30.8% (4/13), which was marginally significant (McNemar’s test, P = 0.070).

The original predicted interaction between threat of diagnosis and Internet use remained marginally significant ( B =.17, SE=0.09, P =.07).

Tukey's post hoc test results showed a significant difference between Conditions 1 and 4 ( p = .005) and 2 and 4 ( p = .04), and a marginally significant difference between Conditions 1 and 3 ( p = .07) in “accuracy”; a significant difference between Conditions 1 and 4 ( p = .05) in “attention”; and a marginally significant difference between Conditions 1 and 4 ( p = .09) in “inhibition.” Figure 4 shows how these measures compare and contrast across different experimental conditions. 4.2.

The interaction SOA×Target was marginally significant, F (3,53) = 2.45, p = .07, η G 2 = .04.

Defined by methodology A, B, or C, higher PD-L1 group showed a better prognosis trend although the difference was marginally significant as determined by the log-rank test (p=0.07 as classified by methodology A, p=0.14 as classified by methodology B, p=0.12 as classified by methodology C, Figures 1A–C ).

One-sample t-tests against the chance level of 0% showed significant effects of stimulation relative to sham for LpIFG ( t (12) = 2.35, p = 0.037) and a marginally significant effect for RpSTG ( t (12) = 1.99, p = 0.07).

When we stratified the data by sex as a biological variable, we found that the association between hippocampal SGK1 ePRS and depression diagnosis was marginally significant for boys (p = 0.07), and significant for girls (*p = 0.01); while the association between SGK1 ePRS and depressive symptoms was only significant for boys (*p = 0.02; Supplementary Table 3 ).

The rate of woody expansion for watersheds with a cumulative number of burns greater than 19 were marginally significant from zero (Mean = 0.33, P = 0.07, T = 2.35, df = 5; Fig. 3 ) indicating that burning regimes implemented more frequently than every 1.6 years may not necessarily prevent woody encroachment.

This was primarily the case for the trustworthiness trait [congruent: Pearson’s r = 0.0076 ± 0.066 (mean ± SD across neurons); incongruent: r = −0.0075 ± 0.062; two-tailed paired t test: t (628) = 2.96, p = 0.003]; the dominance trait only showed a marginally significant difference between conditions (congruent: r = −0.0073 ± 0.060; incongruent: r = 0.0015 ± 0.060; t (628) = 1.82, p = 0.07).

The main effect of group was marginally significant [ X 2 (2) = 5.14, p = 0.07].

Key differences in significance were that the previously significant effects of attitude accessibility (β = .04, 95% CI = [−0.01, 0.09], p = .13), social desirability (β = .04, 95% CI = [−0.01, 0.09], p = .15), rated ease of representation (β = −.061, 95% CI = [−0.16, −0.03], p = .20), anticipated regret ( Q = 2.77, p = .10), and behavior domain ( Q = 5.59, p = .23) on the QBE became non-significant, and the previously significant effect of question type became marginally significant ( Q = 5.197, p = .07).

The other study found marginally significant differences between groups, with a greater decrease in mean hs-CRP with 100% OJ intake but lower final hs-CRP concentrations with OJ from concentrate ( P = 0.07) ( 41 ).

However, a main effect of time period was significant ( F [2.40, 28.79] = 32.34, p < 0.01, η 2 p = 0.73) and an interaction of test beverage × time period was marginally significant ( F [3.40, 40.74] = 2.45, p = 0.07, η 2 p = 0.17).

Daphnia that received a laboratory-derived microbial inoculum showed marginally significant interactions between infection and genotype or cyanobacterium treatment (infection × genotype: F = 3.3, df = 2,6.7, P = 0.07 and infection × cyanobacterium: F = 4.0, df = 1, 4.1, P = 0.07).

The biomass averaged across the seasons demonstrated a marginally significant ( p = 0.07) poleward decrease ( Figure 2 a), which was associated with the decrease in mean annual temperature and with variation in fine root biomass ( Table 3 ).

We used a three-way rmANOVA with the factors HEMISPHERE, MODIFICATION and AGENCY and found a marginally significant interaction effect of MODIFICATION and AGENCY [ F (1 , 34) = 3.57, p = 0.07].

For length 3, a two-way ANOVA for the three representations and the second and third positions showed a significant interaction (F(2, 20) = 7.07, p<0.01), a marginally significant effect of positions (F(1, 10) = 4.73, p<0.07), and a significant effect of representations (F(2, 20) = 36.95, p<0.001).

However, when adjusting the variables of sex, BMI, presence of diabetes, history of CVD, DBP, nPCR, and urine volume, a marginally significant association of iPD with CV mortality (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.25–1.05; p = 0.07) was observed.

Although the log-transformed change in AChE activity was not associated with any of these subclasses, change in BChE activity demonstrated a significant association with average percentage of behavioural symptoms (p=0.04) and a marginally significant association with average percentage of cognitive symptoms (p=0.07).

As predicted, majority decision-making yielded a marginally significant positive relationship to team performance for teams with high task representations and high leadership ambiguity ( t = 1.85, p = 0.07; see slope 1 in Figure 4 ) and a significant negative relationship to team performance for teams with low shared task representations and high leadership ambiguity ( t = −4.56, p < 001; see slope 3 in Figure 4 ).

While the correlation between multiplication skill and temporal cortex activation at T1 was not significant ( r = −.26, p = .22), the correlation at T2 was marginally significant ( r = .37, p = .07).

Serum albumin was a marginally significant negative predictive factor of SRE (HR = 0.59; p = 0.070) by multivariate analysis.

The association with all cancers combined was marginally significant ( P =0.07) and after adjustment for the GINI index was significant for each cancer type except hepatic tumours, the lymphoid leukaemia and Hodgkins disease subtypes, and all cancers combined.