“marginally significant”

The amount of saliva cortisol of caregiver controls rose to a significantly higher level at 15 and 30 min after awakening compared to that immediately after awakening ( P < 0.001 for both) and subsided to a marginally significant level at 45 min after awakening ( P < 0.07).

In the case of cmetS-Z, however, a marginally significant relationship with fitness was only found in girls ( p = 0.07).

Likelihood scores: There was a marginally significant interaction between time×valence×group for the ratings of likelihood [F(2, 146)=2.71, p =0.07, η 2 =0.04].

A greater activation (marginally significant at p = 0.07) in the right hippocampus of younger adults as opposed to older adults promotes further hypotheses.

However, the analysis yielded a significant main effect of Face Orientation, F (1, 70) = 41.02, p < 0.001, η p 2 , CI: 0.19, 0.51, which was qualified by a marginally significant interaction with Construal Level, F (2, 70) = 2.78, p < 0.07, η p 2 = 0.07, CI: 0, 0.19.

The same pattern held true when we repeated the partial correlation analyses with the sub-sample of aphasic individuals only, with comprehension and repetition alone showing marginally significant correlations of 0.33 ( p = 0.07) and 0.32 ( p = 0.08), respectively.

The effect of vitamin D status groups on WOMAC function was marginally significant ( P = 0.07); preoperative WOMAC function was lowest in the moderate-to-severe hypovitaminosis D group compared with the sufficient vitamin D group (MD −13.1, 95% CI −24.1 to −2.0) but was associated with the largest improvements over time (Table 2 ).

From pre- to follow-up assessment, dependent t -tests showed a significant reduction of social anxiety measured with the LSAS ( P = 0.04) and marginally significant results for the SPS score ( P = 0.07) and the SIAS score ( P = 0.06) (see Table 1 ).

Regional population dynamics A marginally significant negative value of Tajima’s D (–1.27, P = 0.070, Table 1 ) and MDA results ( Supplementary Fig.

The task × force level interaction was marginally significant, F (1,24) = 3.50, p = .07, η p 2 = .127.

More importantly, the overall results also revealed a marginally significant distance × congruence interaction [F (1, 27) = 3.53, p = .07, η 2 partial = .12] and a significant distance × congruence × hemisphere interaction [F (2, 54) = 5.03, p < .05, η 2 partial = .16].

Individuals infected with mange experienced a marginally significant increase in their hazard of mortality with increasing proportions of infected pack-mates (β mange*infected packmates = 0.55, 95% CI: −0.04, 1.14, P = 0.07), whereas healthy individuals appeared unaffected (β infected packmates = −0.21, 95% CI: −0.68, 0.26, P = 0.39) (Fig. 3 ).

3.5.3 Depression The effect of time on Depression scores was marginally significant [ F (2, 78) = 2.751; p = 0.070; η 2 = 0.066], with an increase from 0 h to 50 h (Δ = −2.750; p = 0.051) and a decrease from 50 h to 96 h (Δ = 2.690; p = 0.036).

A negative correlation was seen between age and the frequency of engagement, that is, as participant age increased, their engagement frequency decreased by 1.85 units, a relationship that was marginally significant ( P =.07) (see Table 2 ).

Removing year from the equation, status remained significant (γ = 0.050, t robust = 4.54, p = 0.001) and type became marginally significant (γ = 0.096, t robust = 1.92, p = 0.07).

Probing the presence of Style differences in Mandarin and English perceivers as a function of Tone, one marginally significant comparison was observed: T3 perceived by English participants ( p = 0.07; p -values >0.25 in other comparisons); their identification of Clear T3 (58.4%, SD = 0.53) was higher than Plain T3 (48.2%, SD = 0.53).

Furthermore, the intervention predicted participants’ personal norm marginally significant ( B = −0.17; p = 0.07, CI [−0.349; 0.016]), which in turn predicted participants’ willingness to offer expired but still edible food highly significant ( B = 0.05, p < 0.001, CI [0.019; 0.076]).

The risk group effect was marginally significant F (1, 97) = 3.26, p = 0.07, ηp 2 = 0.03, and there was no group*sex interaction F (1, 97) = 0.03, p = 0.88, ηp 2 < 0.001.

Post-hoc analyses revealed a marginally significant effect of gender on reading fluency in year 1, in year 1, F (1, 1,455) = 3.36, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.00, indicating that females’ reading fluency ( m = 24.04) was slightly lower than that of males’ ( m = 25.08, SD = 10.48).

However, the analysis revealed a significant proximal intent x gender interaction, F (1, 462) = 4.80, p < .03, η p 2 = .01, and a marginally significant distal intent x gender interaction, F (1, 462) = 3.25, p = .07, η p 2 = .007.

Results demonstrated a significant increase in the positive emotions category for the entire group of women, with particular relevance for the biological therapy group of women, and a marginally significant (p = .07) greater use of words indicating cognitive processes for women receiving biological therapy.

There was a marginally significant effect of trial type on the intercept: b = -0.16, χ 2 (1) = 3.4, p < .07.

Key differences in significance were that the previously significant effects of attitude accessibility (β = .04, 95% CI = [−0.01, 0.09], p = .13), social desirability (β = .04, 95% CI = [−0.01, 0.09], p = .15), rated ease of representation (β = −.061, 95% CI = [−0.16, −0.03], p = .20), anticipated regret ( Q = 2.77, p = .10), and behavior domain ( Q = 5.59, p = .23) on the QBE became non-significant, and the previously significant effect of question type became marginally significant ( Q = 5.197, p = .07).

The overall beta power tended to be larger in the detection task, as indicated by a marginally significant main effect of Task, F 1,33 = 3.62, P = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.10.

Results indicated that the association between array size and the probability of evaluating the crowd as emotional was marginally significant ( b = 0.05 [−0.004, 0.11], SE = 0.02, z = 1.79, p = 0.07, R 2 c = 0.16), which is more or less similar to Experiments 1 and 2 and may be driven by the low variance of face size, and the fact that it was only 4,8 or 12 faces.