“marginally significant”

Interestingly, ESCCs under strong selection exhibit significantly higher gITH ( P < 0.001) and achieve a marginally significant increase for copy number ITH ( P = 0.07) as compared to samples with neutral evolution.

3.5.3 Depression The effect of time on Depression scores was marginally significant [ F (2, 78) = 2.751; p = 0.070; η 2 = 0.066], with an increase from 0 h to 50 h (Δ = −2.750; p = 0.051) and a decrease from 50 h to 96 h (Δ = 2.690; p = 0.036).

All of the remaining single sample showed a marginally significant editing level when compared to the 12 honeybee workers (1 versus 12 comparison, P = 0.07).

Tukey's post hoc test results showed a significant difference between Conditions 1 and 4 ( p = .005) and 2 and 4 ( p = .04), and a marginally significant difference between Conditions 1 and 3 ( p = .07) in “accuracy”; a significant difference between Conditions 1 and 4 ( p = .05) in “attention”; and a marginally significant difference between Conditions 1 and 4 ( p = .09) in “inhibition.” Figure 4 shows how these measures compare and contrast across different experimental conditions. 4.2.

The coefficient for alcohol consumption was negative and marginally significant for VSTMRS ( - 7.2, p-value = 0.07), hinting that moderate alcohol consumption may be linked to poor short-term memory.

Upon further consideration of confounders in Mode 3, 1–2 cups/day of total coffee or caffeinated coffee was still associated with a lower risk of constipation although it is marginally significant for total coffee (total coffee: OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35–1.06, p = 0.07); caffeinated coffee: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35–0.95, p = 0.03).

Specifically, while there was a significant main effect of Accent in how manipulative the Palestinian delegate was viewed ( F (2, 445) = 3.83, p = 0.02, η p 2 = 0.01), this effect was driven by a marginally significant difference in manipulativeness ratings between the Mild ( M = 3.69, SD = 1.74) and Heavy ( M = 4.24, SD = 1.80; t = 2.19, p = 0.07, d = 0.25) accent conditions with there being no significant differences in manipulativeness ratings between the Native-like (M = 3.96, SD = 1.94) and Mild ( t < 1) and Heavy accent conditions ( t = 1.30, p = 0.40, d = 0.13).

When the two PRSs were conditioned on each other (Model 3), the association with a woman's PRS remained unchanged, and the association with her sister's PRS attenuated 71% ( p = 10 −16 ) to be at best marginally significant (OPERA = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.17; p = 0.07).

The physical assault by supportive reactions interaction term was marginally significant ( β = .21, 95% CI [−.01, .43], p = .07).

3.1 Diet variation The CCA analysis by area showed marginally significant (CB: 999 permutations, DF = 13, 13, F = 1.2, p = 0.07), significant (inshore: 999 permutations, DF = 14, 26, F = 1.4, p = 0.001), or no significant results (offshore: 719 permutations, DF = 4, 1, F = 1.2, p = 0.27) under the full models across the explanatory factors: size category, season, and year.

Results indicated that female participants showed marginally significant reductions in mean NAA, t (15) = −1.58, p = 0.07, and GABA, t (15) = −1.44, p = 0.08, values in the active stimulation condition.

FRS significantly differed across diagnostic groups ( p < 0.001), and anti‐hypertension medications were marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

Compared to emotion words, the difference is marginally significant ( p = . 07 ).

There was a marginally significant reduction in average diarrhea scores of 0.53 units between genotype C relative to genotype A on 10 DPI ( P = 0.07).

For two SNPs, the differences between observed (0/0: 15, 0/1: 15, 1/1: 0) and expected (0/0: 17, 0/1: 11, 1/1: 2) genotype frequencies were statistically significant using a Likelihood ratio test ( p value = 0.02) and marginally significant using a chi‐square test ( p value = 0.07) (Table S3 ).

The prediction from intention to breastfeeding was weaker for exclusive breastfeeding persistence until 6 months (Table 4 ): a marginally significant association was found between intention to breastfeed and exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months (95% CI 0.88–19.42, P < 0.07, OR 4.13).

The difference between respondents with children was also found to be marginally significant, with higher scores (M = 4.23; SD = 0.78) vs. respondents without biological children (M = 4.08; SD = 0.86; t(429) = 1.8, p = 0.07) on the question of giving information about family health history.

A 2 (creative mindset: fixed or growth) × 2 (task requirement: 5 ideas, 10 or more ideas) ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of creative mindset, F (1, 210) = 3.40, p = 0.07, η P 2 = 0.02, indicating that the cognitive flexibility was higher for the participants primed for the creative growth mindset ( M = 2.80, SD = 0.07) than for those primed for the creative fixed mindset condition ( M = 2.64, SD = 0.06).

In ACUTE-COVID, T1 had significantly more symptoms than T2 ( M = 5.3, SD = 3.1 and M = 4.3, SD = 2.6 respectively, p =.002) while the difference with T3 was marginally significant ( p =.07).

EGFR mutations were marginally significant ( P = .07, logistic regression P = .047).

The interactions between graduate institutions and internship enterprises were marginally significant ( F (1, 31) = 3.60, p = 0.070, η 2 p = 0.09, and 95%CI [−0.038, 7.383]).

Only a marginally significant main effect of emotional tone was found for PVA ( F (2, 67) = 2.68, p < 0.07).

The difference in RTs between the VR-Lab and the Desktop-Lab conditions was marginally significant ( P =.07).

However, the inverse association between total fat intake and PRISm remained marginally significant (adjusted OR = 0.90 per SD; 95% CI: 0.80–1.01; p = 0.070).

The number of degenerated cysts was higher in younger and older pigs compared to those infected at intermediate ages, showing marginally significant differences between age groups (Kruskal–Wallis H -test, H = 10.29, df = 5, P = 0.07).