“marginally significant”

A marginally significant ( p = 0.07) inverse relationship between the number of children and mean hair THg concentration was found with the highest levels in women who had not had children previously.

This association remained marginally significant after adjusting for age, sex, years of education, and living arrangements in Model 1 (b=1.26, 95% CI −0.13 to 2.64; P =.07) and additionally for MMSE score in Model 2 (b=1.41, 95% CI −0.01 to 2.83; P =.05).

4 ), and channel 6 (RH FPC; marginally significant, F(1, 60) = 3.394, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.05; table 2 ).

A comparison of the 2 types of intervention showed no differences in the mean score between the 2 groups for pain at rest at T 7 (P = 0.93) and at T 28 (P = 0.58), but that comparison showed significant mean score reductions for pain at defecation in the RBL group during the first week (T 0-7 ; P = 0.004) and a marginally significant reduction for the RBL+MPFF group (P = 0.07).

With the variability associated with age and verbal IQ controlled, right hippocampal volume emerged as a marginally significant predictor ( p = .07) of open-ended stem fact recall.

One path was marginally significant at a P value of .10 ( P =.07), and the other 2 paths were close to marginally significant ( P =.11 and .12; see Table 4 ).

Moreover, we observed a marginally significant ( p = 0.07, Mann–Whitney test) difference in the number of DRMs of NS3-specific DAAs (4–10) and multi-protein DAAs (8–16).

However, the interaction effect between illusion type and the number of repeated auditory stimuli was marginally significant, F (1,26) = 3.52, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.12, which means that the one and two repeated stimuli conditions showed no significant difference for both fission and fusion illusions.

(B) A marginally significant interaction between time, treatment and AD severity was observed for Factor 2, p = 0.07, and subsequent stratifications show that only mild AD subjects treated with nilvadipine had less decline compared to their placebo controls.

Specifically, while there was a significant main effect of Accent in how manipulative the Palestinian delegate was viewed ( F (2, 445) = 3.83, p = 0.02, η p 2 = 0.01), this effect was driven by a marginally significant difference in manipulativeness ratings between the Mild ( M = 3.69, SD = 1.74) and Heavy ( M = 4.24, SD = 1.80; t = 2.19, p = 0.07, d = 0.25) accent conditions with there being no significant differences in manipulativeness ratings between the Native-like (M = 3.96, SD = 1.94) and Mild ( t < 1) and Heavy accent conditions ( t = 1.30, p = 0.40, d = 0.13).

3B ; though marginally significant due to the data size: p-value = 0.07, permutation test) and 7.32 Hz (Fig. 3C ) for the correlation and attentional index, respectively).

Marginally significant higher level in smokers was found in the first Model 1 ( p = 0.07) but the level in EC users and duals was not significantly different compared to non-smokers.

MVV Over all subjects, correlations revealed significant associations between MVV and the reported likelihood of having fallen asleep (r =.37, p < .001), MVV, and ESS (r = −.14, p =.05), and marginally significant associations between MVV and KSS pre (r = −.13, p =.07).

On the contrary, single-domain MCI had marginally significant lower prevalence in the LOEU-MCI group than in the NE-MCI group ( n = 7, 25.9% vs. n = 11, 52.4%, p = 0.07).

The second ANOVA, conducted in order to provide a more in-depth investigation into the interaction between the priming effect and emotional valences, did yield a marginally significant Prime Emotion × Target Emotion interaction [ F (2,56, 97.21) = 2.5, p < 0.07, η p^2 = 0.06].

However, at 18 months, mean weight loss was 4.3±1.7 kg in those in the very poor category and 8.2±1.2 kg in those in the poor or better category, with a marginally significant between-group difference (p=0.07).

However, one month after TACE, the median survival time of low-NLR patients and high-NLR patients was 26.3 and 18.2 months, respectively, meaning the difference was marginally significant (P=0.070, Figure 2C ).

However, when adjusting the variables of sex, BMI, presence of diabetes, history of CVD, DBP, nPCR, and urine volume, a marginally significant association of iPD with CV mortality (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.25–1.05; p = 0.07) was observed.

However, a marginally significant gender differences between male and female were found on the EC ( t (24) = −1.894, p = .070) and the FS ( t (24) = −1.979, p = .059) subscales. 3.2 Behavioral results Mean rating scores of the two experimental conditions (painful and neutral) were 8.003 ± 0.795 and 1.133 ± 0.263 (mean ± SD ), respectively (see Figure 2 a).

Participants’ Evaluation An ANOVA on the participants’ evaluation revealed a significant main effect of PDB (M high PDB = 4.26, M low PDB = 4.84; F(1,92) = 7.706, p = 0.007) and marginally significant main effect of the purchase type (M material purchase = 4.35, M experiential purchase = 4.74; F(1,92) = 3.407, p = 0.07).

There was a marginally significant interaction between handedness direction and handedness strength [ F (1,62) = 3.28; p = .07; η p 2 = 0.05], but since this was only a marginal trend, we did not examine it further.

In the sensitivity analyses, the significant associations between the aforementioned lipids and HUA were not altered [RR: 0.79–1.53; all p < 0.05 except for LPC (20:2), which was marginally significant ( p = 0.07)], after excluding participants taking lipid-lowering medications and those with declined kidney functions (Table S3 ).

Comparison between groups and survival analysis Comparison of clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients showed similar median age, gender, site and onset of metastases and median tumor size but a marginally significant difference in the median size of metastases was found (< 3 cm: 45.9 vs 53.7%; > 3 cm: 54.1 vs 46.3%; p = 0.07) (Table 1 ).

For the P2 component, repeated-measures ANOVA confirmed a marginally significant main effect of salience, F (1, 25) = 3.68, p = 0.07, η 2 p = 0.13, in the absence of a significant congruency effect, F (1, 25) = 0.04, p = 0.85, η 2 p = 0.001.

Neutrophil concentration showed marginally significant interactions between treatment and time ( P = 0.07), with higher levels in the PM40 group.