“marginally significant”

But whereas the contrast was marginally significant when not adjusted for phylogeny ( F 1,44 = 3.53, p =0 .07), too few independent taxonomic clusters were present for this to be robust to phylogenetic correction (pMCMC = 0.44).

Moreover, there is a marginally significant correlation between the FBT_2 justification score and WST ( r s = .29, p = .07).

Despite the lack of significance, simple t-tests (one-tailed) indicated that the dyslexia group differed from the control group in the Explicit-Assist task, t (41) = 2.405, p = 0.02, with a marginally significant difference in the No-Explicit-Assist task, t (41) = 1.85, p = 0.07 (after Bonferroni correction).

We observed that being generally obese in comparison with non-obese increased the risk of CV and all-cause mortality in all glucose tolerance statuses; while considering CVD events, only among individuals with T2DM, the presence of general obesity was associated with marginally significant higher risk [1.19 (0.98–1.43); p-value = 0.07].

In none of these cases did we find a significant relationship between the number of WGCW hotspots and mutation frequency ( S2 Table ) with the possible exception of RA, where we observe a marginally significant positive correlation (r = 0.42, P = 0.07, S1 Fig ).

Although, there were no statistically significant interactions between psychological measures and sex or BMI on CRP, there was a marginally significant interaction for the categorical variable of Class II or greater obesity and anxiety on CRP ( p =0.07).

Better performance in the PS domain was related to higher FA in FMAJ and IFOF and lower MD in CHC, CS, FMAJ, and IFOF (marginally significant, p = 0.07).

The interactions between experiments and measure types were significant when comparing Experiment 1 with Experiment 2 ( B = −0.60, SE = 0.33, p = 0.07, R 2 = 0.10; marginally significant), and comparing Experiment 2 with Experiment 3 ( B = 0.69, SE = 0.33, p = 0.04, R 2 = 0.10).

Of the 27 terms in the six models, 24 (89%) were significant (P < 0.05 in 22 cases) or marginally significant (P < 0.07 in 2 cases) ( Table 1 ).

In the third model, there was a main effect of parenting stress (β = 0.55, p < 0.01), and the effect of the interaction between parenting stress and perceived social support was marginally significant (β = −0.05, p = 0.07).

1B ), and a marginally significant isolates x medium interaction effect ( P = 0.07), with C. longipes and T. harzianum having significantly higher qCO 2 in rich medium (Table 1 ).

We also observed a marginally significant interaction between age group and activity type, β = 0.01, SE = 0.01, t = 1.83, p = .07.

Moreover, the effect of the self-efficacy messages was marginally significant ( P = .07) for positive attitudes toward checking their skin, with women reporting more positive attitudes toward checking their skin than men on a scale of 1–5 (mean = 4.2, 95% CI = 4.1–4.3 vs 4.0, 95% CI = 3.9–4.1; P = .004, η p 2 = 0.02).

In terms of the d-FRN's statistical analysis from the other-chosen stocks, a 2 (stock owner: self, other) × 10 (electrode: F3, F4, FC1, FC2, Fz, Cz, C3, C4, CP1, and CP2) ANOVA produced a marginally significant main effect of ownership, F (1, 21) = 3.65, p = 0.07, η 2 partial = 0.148.

In Period 2, each 1 % higher adherence was associated with a 5 % increase in the odds of suppression (p = 0.006), while a smaller marginally significant increase was seen in Period 1 (p = 0.07).

The effect tended to be reflected in a marginally significant cluster in the right frontal cortex ( t ‐mass: 15.55, p = .07; cluster size: 7, p < .05).

The numbers of attacks were low in summer ( n = 3) and higher in spring ( n = 10), autumn ( n = 12) and winter ( n = 14), and this difference was marginally significant ( χ 2 = 7.051, p = 0.070).

Furthermore, the interaction between Stimulus and Updating approached significance (β = 0.599, p = 0.071) , and the three-way interaction of Stimulus × Trial × Updating also demonstrated a marginally significant effect (β = -0.155, p = 0.070) (see Table 3 ).

This increase was marginally significant at the posttest, β = 0.51, p = 0.07, and significant at the 3-month follow-up, β = 0.88, p = 0.007.

For two levels, the gender difference was marginally significant in the lower level (p = 0.07), but not significant in the upper level.

But patients with macroscopic ETE who did not receive EBRT showed a marginally significant decrease in CSS (p = 0.07) than those who received EBRT.

Interestingly, however, despite a numerically greater response to Concave than Convex Conditions in both Buildings and Objects, we only found a marginally significant main effect of Condition ( F (1,11) = 4.22, p = .07, η p 2 = .28), with post-hoc comparison revealing no significant difference between Concave versus Convex Buildings ( p = .12) and Objects ( p = .38).

persistent) showed only a marginally significant improvement in nutrition related issues for the group outgrown CMA (p = 0.07) at 7-year follow-up.

For the comparison of response conflict (RI-SI), the difference was marginally significant among the four blocks, F (3,150) = 2.11, p = .07.

As predicted, majority decision-making yielded a marginally significant positive relationship to team performance for teams with high task representations and high leadership ambiguity ( t = 1.85, p = 0.07; see slope 1 in Figure 4 ) and a significant negative relationship to team performance for teams with low shared task representations and high leadership ambiguity ( t = −4.56, p < 001; see slope 3 in Figure 4 ).