Two-sample t -tests revealed that these differences were statistically significant across all blocks ( p < 0.0001), except for the 'feedback-second, no-feedback, high-prevalence' block, where the difference was marginally significant ( t (20) = −1.90, p = 0.072).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Extraversion was a marginally significant positive predictor in both the second, β = 0.12, SE = 0.04, p = 0.072, and the third, β = 0.11, SE = 0.04, p = 0.088, steps.
There was also a marginally significant decrease in the mean tear volume averaged for both eyes with diphenhydramine ( t [31] = 1.864, p = 0.072).
The dmft found in children with perinatal HIV infection was low and was marginally significant ( P = 0.072, i.e., P > 0.05; however P < 0.10) compared with that of normal children.
The Narcissism × P3 valence difference interaction was marginally significant, β = 0.352, t = 1.842, P = 0.072.
There was a marginally significant interaction between city and “brand vs. bulk” in predicting the proportion of oil samples that were fortified ( P = 0.072): over 70% of “brand name” oil samples were fortified in both cities, whereas, among “bulk” oil samples, 41% in Yaoundé, but only 10% in Douala, were fortified.
The Session × Group interaction accounted for marginally significant variance in the FFR strength at F0 [μV; b = 0.0037, t (48) = 1.77, p = 0.0721]; regressions conducted on each group showed that following training, choir participants demonstrated improvements in the neural representation of pitch [ b = 0.0033, t (29) = 2.60, p = 0.009], while control participants did not demonstrate significant changes [ b = −0.00034, t (19) = −0.21, p = 0.8346; see Table 1 ].
Multivariate analysis identified number of CD163 + CD204 + cells as a marginally significant prognostic factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.97; P = 0.0722) (Table 2 ).
In particular, all variables that were not significant in the original model were again not significant in the new model, and Flanker reaction time congruency cost was marginally significant ( β = 0.34410, SE = 0.18445, t = 1.866, p = .0723).
However, there was a marginally significant association between species and O. ophidiicola detection ( p = 0.0724; see Table S6 ). 4.
Although columns (2) and (5) of Panel A show a marginally significant positive link in rural areas at the 10% level (unadjusted p < 0.073), with no significant effect in urban areas (unadjusted p = 0.278), the FDR correction reported in columns (3) and (6) renders these results insignificant.
A marginally significant difference was observed in the UN of ethical clearance (U = 952.50, p = 0.073).
While age and gender were not significantly associated with outcome, the only other parameter that was marginally significant in multivariate analysis was the T-category with T3 having a relative risk of 2.51 compared with T2 ( P =0.073).
There was a marginally significant association between the number of maltreatment types experienced by participants and HCV infection (aOR: 1.13; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.28; p=0.073).
P300 amplitude was lower in RLS patients than controls, and this difference was marginally significant ( F (1,28) = 3.468, p = 0.073).
Recovery and mortality rates presented better results in the North than in the South arm: recovery rate 128% versus 67% higher at Day 14 (p=0.009) and 81% versus 51% at Day 28 (non-significantly; p=0.66), and all-cause mortality rate 83% versus 78% lower at Day 14 (marginally significant; p=0.073) and 78% versus 72% at Day 28 (p=0.004).
A significant interaction effect for Mindfulness × APOE ε 4 status was found in the younger group ( β = 0.525, p = 0.016), while the older group demonstrated a marginally significant interaction for mindfulness ( β = 0.211, p = 0.073).
Additionally, parenting stress showed a marginally significant negative correlation with child RSA during the parent–child interaction tasks, r (43) = −0.27, p = 0.073, but had no association with child RSA during the independently completed tasks, r (46) = −0.03, p = 0.847.
Statistical analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of Condition ( F (1,19) = 3.61, p = .073), a main effect of Region ( F (4,76) = 80.73, p <.001), and an interaction between these factors ( F (4,76) = 5.93, p = .002).
There was a marginally significant main effect of Group, F(1, 20) = 3.57, p = 0.073, partial η 2 = 0.151.
According to the methodological heterogeneity between studies and their different charactristics, we performed the analysis based on random-effect model that indicated a marginally significant association between DAL and risk of fracture (N event = 5275, Pooled OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.99–1.21, P = 0.073) (I 2 = 12.9%; P = 0.321).
We observed a similar pattern to recognition accuracy, with higher A’ on the no-sauna group (A′ = 0.903) compared to the sauna group (A′ = 0.886), although this effect was marginally significant [F(1,66) = 3.318, p = 0.073].
The total net effect of water addition on the bacterial community was marginally significant [standardized coefficient = 0.28, Z value (dividing the regression weight estimate by its standard error) = 1.79, P = 0.073], whereas that of nitrogen addition was non-significant (standardized coefficient = 0.11, Z value = 1.35, P = 0.176).
An independent samples t -test showed that the difference between beginners and intermediate learners from native speakers was marginally significant; beginners tended to be less native-like than intermediate learners ( t (10.041) = 2.003, p = .073).
A marginally significant effect of load [ F (2,28) = 3.681, p = 0.073] suggested that the single flanker condition elicited the largest amplitude response (7.01 μV), followed by the dual task conditions with set size 4 (5.984 μV) and set size 7 (5.4 μV).