Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0731.5× alphagold
On account of a marginally significant correlation between ND enhancement of supra-threshold connectivity of the alpha band and the ND-MF of postural fluctuations ( r = 0.307, p = 0.073), a further detailed correlation analysis was performed with consideration of the ND enhancement of the supra-threshold connectivity of the alpha band from the three key nodes (O 2 , P z , and Fp 2 ) ( Table 4 ; Figure 5B ).
marginally significantp = .0731.5× alphagold
Following up a marginally significant interaction Cognitive Demand * ADHD on target-N2 amplitude ( F 1,68 = 3.323; p = .073; η 2 p = .047) showed that children with ADHD (ADHD-only and ADHD+autism) had reduced target- N2 during high-demand trials ( M = −2.987 μV; SE = 0.344 μV), compared to children without ADHD (NT and autism-only: M = −4.043 μV; SE = 0.387 μV; p = .048).
marginally significantp = 0.0731.5× alphagold
Similarly, the corresponding ANOVA of the N170 peak amplitude revealed a significant main effect of infant facial expression [ F (2,124) = 5.55, p = 0.008, η 2 = 0.082], with statistically significant larger amplitudes for joy infant faces (-8.23 ± 0.88 μV) than for crying ones (-7.79 ± 0.85 μV) ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant larger amplitudes than for neutral ones (-7.90 ± 0.86 μV) ( p = 0.073).
marginally significantp < .0731.5× alphagold
There were significant changes in the HV ( t = 7.78; p < .001) as well as fornix FA ( t = 5.89; p < .001) and MD ( t = 4.27; p < .001) in their expected directions, the decline in ADNI-MEM scores was marginally significant ( t = 1.81; p < .073) the violin plots of these measures are shown in fig.
marginally significantp = 0.0731.5× alphagold
On two validation sets that had patient outcome data, patients with IDH-wildtype gliomas that were predicted to be IDH-mutant astrocytomas demonstrated significant ( p = 0.016, Jonsson et al., log-rank) or marginally significant ( p = 0.073, TCGA validation, log-rank) improvement in survival compared to correctly predicted IDH-wildtype gliomas (Fig. 5 E, F).