Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0741.5× alphagold
However, Tukey’s post hoc tests revealed no differences between specific education levels, except for a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.074) in the ranking of Idea 8 ( popular people ) between secondary education (HAVO, n = 23, M = 5.74) and university students ( n = 167, M = 4.40). 4.
marginally significantp = 0.0741.5× alphagold
A significant worsening of renal function was also found [serum creatinine; 0.04 (+0.03, +0.05), p<0.0001; eGFR with CKD-EPI formula (mL/min/1.73m2): -3.48 (-4.26, -2.69), p<0.0001] as well as a marginally significant increase in fasting insulin [0.87 (-0.09, +1.83), p = 0.074] not accompanied by a significant change in fasting glucose (p = 0.496) or HOMA-IR (p = 0.232).
marginally significantp = 0.0741.5× alphagold
Repeated-measures ANOVA on PANSS and all its subscales showed a marginally significant interaction effect (group × time: F = 2.2, df = 1, 39, p = 0.074), nonsignificant group effect ( F = 0.74, df = 1, 39, p = 0.48), and time effect ( F = 1.6, df = 4, 39, p = 0.28).
marginally significantp=0.0741.5× alphagold
At the univariate analysis, a significant correlation with the duration of abiraterone exposure was found for Gleason score (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.96; p=0.012), PSA (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.18; p=0.08) and lactic dehydrogenase levels (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.46; p=0.027), while the association between lower alkaline phosphatase levels and treatment duration was marginally significant (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.16; p=0.074).
marginally significantp = 0.0741.5× alphagold
aureus at the same time point ( Figure 3D ), only three of the extract contents of TW and TA showed statistically significant differences: 0.04 ( p < 0.001), 0.08 ( p = 0.002), and 1.25 mg/mL ( p = 0.008), and an additional 0.63 mg/mL showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.074).
marginally significantp = .0741.5× alphagold
Pre-registered traditional ANOVAs For ERPs time-locked to inflection onset, repeated measures ANOVAs on the four quadrants revealed a marginally significant prediction-mismatch effect [ F (1,186) = 3.21, p = .074, mean difference = −.14 μV, 95% CI = (–.01, .29), Cohen's d = .168], reflecting, on average, less positive voltage for the mismatching condition than for the matching condition (match, M = .62 μV, SD = 1.17; mismatch, M = .48 μV, SD = 1.05).