“marginally significant”

A paired t-test revealed a marginally significant gain in bone length (estimate of bone loss=-0.34 mm, P =0.074) after implant placement at sites in the smallest initial bone length group (2.7 to 4.99 mm), and no significant differences in bone length were observed in the other groups ( Table 3 ).

Pre-registered traditional ANOVAs For ERPs time-locked to inflection onset, repeated measures ANOVAs on the four quadrants revealed a marginally significant prediction-mismatch effect [ F (1,186) = 3.21, p = .074, mean difference = −.14 μV, 95% CI = (–.01, .29), Cohen's d = .168], reflecting, on average, less positive voltage for the mismatching condition than for the matching condition (match, M = .62 μV, SD = 1.17; mismatch, M = .48 μV, SD = 1.05).

The joint test of the quadratic terms was marginally significant, Wald χ 2 (2) = 5.20, p = .074, whereas the joint test of the linear effects was significant, Wald χ 2 (2) = 13.08, p = .001.

The center parameter for temporal tuning was also shifted more toward the signal onset in early blind individuals, which was marginally significant [ t (14) = 1.93, P = 0.074].

Obviously in the fourth and sixth weeks, differences were marginally significant (P = 0. 074 and P = 0. 068).

The model with the Digit Span score as moderator was marginally significant ( F (3,77) = 2.40, p = 0.074, R 2 = 0.086) and the ANT and Stroop scores did not significantly moderate the relationship between age group and placebo hypoalgesia (both F < 1.45, p > 0.236).

For memory, the predictive ability of cortical thickness remained marginally significant for the limbic network ( r = 0.11, p = 0.074, 95% CI [0.01 0.2 ]) and default mode networks ( r = 0.05, p = 0.056, 95% CI [0.01 0.1 ]).

In fact, since participant age also had a marginally significant positive relationship with both BFI-Conscientiousness (Pearson-r = .216, N = 69, p = .074) and SC SD (Pearson-r = .215, N = 69, p = .076), the effect of age also needed to be controlled.

Multigroup modeling using the main model indicated a significant sex difference in the effect of potassium excretion on depression [Δχ 2 (1) = 8.150, P = 0.004] and a marginally significant sex difference for sodium excretion [Δχ 2 (1) = 3.196, P = 0.074].

However, tritan thresholds did reveal a significant age effect [χ 2 (4)tritan = 12.70, p = 0.013], though post hoc (Dunn-Bonferroni) tests revealed only a marginally significant difference between two age groups ([30;40[vs [40;50[; p = 0.074).

The interaction between age and word frequency was marginally significant, F (4, 137) = 2.18, p = 0.074, η 2 = 0.06, but no other interaction approached significance, F s < 1.86, p s > 0.12.

Our manipulation check indicated that participants in the coping potential affirmation condition ( M = 3.34, SD = .76) appraised their coping potential more favorably than those in the control condition ( M = 3.12, SD = .72); this effect was marginally significant, t (141) = −1.80, p = .074.

A marginally significant main effect of the visual status ( p = .074) showed that late blind participants tended to learn faster in comparison to their sighted counterparts.

When controlling for VWMC, social anxiety was not significantly correlated with the spatial-blink effect under the goal-irrelevant distractor condition, although it was marginally significant, r = 0.29, p = 0.074.

The difference in the Apgar score at 5 min between the two groups was marginally significant ( p = 0.074).

perienced significantly (P<0.001) higher rates of collapse than trees of forms 3–7, (2) large trees with cavities within old growth stands were significantly (P = 0.009) less likely to collapse than trees within 1939-aged stands and ∼20-year old stands, and (3) trees on high productivity sites were marginally significant (P = 0.074) more likely to collapse than trees on low productivity sites ( Supplementary Information S3 ).

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis using vitamin D tertiles indicated that VD tertile 1 demonstrated a marginally significant hazard ratio in comparison to VD tertile 3 (aHR 2.45, 95% CI 0.92–6.54, p = 0.074 , Supplementary Table S4 ).

Spheroids from fast-relaxing gels did also trend toward increased growth, with a marginally significant p value = 0.074.

A linear mixed-effects model with SCS scores as the dependent variable revealed a marginally significant Group × Time interaction effect via Type III Wald F tests ( F = 2.66, p = 0.074) (see Table 3 ).

A marginally significant CO and HE interaction was found for the last of the three intervals (433–500 ms; F(1, 7) = 4.408; p = 0.074).

Hypothesis 2a: Figure 5 shows, for the amount of total investment, a marginally significant [ F (1, 17) = 3.615, p = 0.074] effect for the Order of Information.

However, Tukey’s post hoc tests revealed no differences between specific education levels, except for a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.074) in the ranking of Idea 8 ( popular people ) between secondary education (HAVO, n = 23, M = 5.74) and university students ( n = 167, M = 4.40). 4.

The interaction effect of PD × LOC was marginally significant for DSUD (β = 0.27, p = 0.074) but was significant for DSUF (β = 0.47, p < 0.001).

OT Reduced Subjective Fear Experience in Social Fear Naturalistic Contexts The ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of emotion ( F (1,65) = 1434, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.957, Figure 1 a ) such that participants rated subjective fear considerably higher during fear trials (FS and FNS) than neutral ones, and a significant main effect of social ( F (1,65) = 76.81, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.542, Figure 1a ) reflecting lower fear during social trials (FS and NS) compared with non‐social trials, and a marginally significant main effect of treatment ( F (1,65) = 3.31, p = 0.074, η p 2 = 0.048, Figure 1a ).

In turn, economic worry ( β = 0.1, p = 0.001) significantly predicted depression levels, and health worry predicted depression levels in a marginally significant manner ( β = 0.06, p = 0.074).