Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = 0.0761.5× alphagold
The interaction effect between PE treatments and sampling dates was marginally significant for the Shannon ( P = 0.076) and significant for the Simpson ( P = 0.036) diversity indices of fungal communities ( Table 1 ), suggesting that the effect of the precipitation manipulation of fungal communities was dependent on the level of precipitation received and on the soil temperature and plant growth stage.
marginally significantp = 0.0761.5× alphagold
The unadjusted correlation analysis demonstrated a positive and significant correlation between DALYs and natural disasters for females and for both sexes (R = 0.163 and 0.146, p = 0.024 and 0.043), and a marginally significant correlation for males (R = 0.128, p = 0.076).
marginally significantp = 0.0761.5× alphagold
In the analysis of RAPM_set 1, a marginally significant difference between the pretest and posttest ( p = 0.076, PP = 0.96) and a significant difference between the pretest and the follow-up session ( p = 0.047, PP = 0.97) were found only for the atDCS+WMT group, with no significant group differences in each moment ( p = 0.12, PP = 0.92).
marginally significantp = 0.0761.5× alphagold
For PANSS negative score, we found a significant decrease from baseline to follow-up in both groups, but a marginally significant group × time interaction indicating a trend toward a greater decrease in the intervention group ( F = 3.46, p = 0.076; Figure 2 and Table 2 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0761.5× alphagold
Considering each AOI separately, the planned t -tests revealed a marginally significant effect for the Open posture judges ( M = 1.3, SD = 0.9) fixating fewer times at the hands than the Closed posture judges ( M = 2.2, SD = 1.6), t (30) = −1.84, p = 0.076, d s = −0.65, 95% CI (−1.36, 0.07) (square root-transformed data).
marginally significantp = 0.0761.5× alphagold
Comparing the TIR/O Group to the XLH Group At the distal radius, compared with the XLH group, the TIR/O group showed significant or marginally significant differences only in a few trabecular parameters ( Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S1A ), such as lower trabecular number (-28.6%, p = 0.076), greater trabecular inhomogeneity (79.0%, p = 0.049), and larger trabecular separation (51.2%, p = 0.074).
marginally significantp = .0761.5× alphagold
The three‐way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of ROI, F (2.07,47.55) = 8.50, p < .001, a marginally significant interaction effect between contrast type and ROI, F (2.76,63.58) = 2.46, p = .076, and critically a significant interaction effect between complexity and ROI, F (2.90,66.59) = 2.77, p = .050; all other effects were not statistically significant ( p s > .21).