“marginally significant”

Consistent with hypothesis 1, the predicted interaction between Republican identification and the Anger contrast was marginally significant, b = –.06, t (291) = –1.78, p = .076, partial η 2 = .01 (see Fig 5 ).

For established entrepreneurs (Table 3 ), increased sleep duration exhibits a positive and marginally significant (p = 0.076) coefficient.

The interaction effect between PE treatments and sampling dates was marginally significant for the Shannon ( P = 0.076) and significant for the Simpson ( P = 0.036) diversity indices of fungal communities ( Table 1 ), suggesting that the effect of the precipitation manipulation of fungal communities was dependent on the level of precipitation received and on the soil temperature and plant growth stage.

Our analysis of beta values revealed a marginally significant effect of presentation time [ F (2,66) = 2.67, p = 0.076, η p 2 = 0.075], which was qualified by a significant interaction between presentation time and task [ F (1266) = 6.15, p = 0.004, η p 2 = 0.16].

43.5%), with a marginally significant difference likely attributed to the small sample size of the study (p = 0.076).

We found a marginally significant species effect on metabolic rate (F 2,90.9 = 2.66, p = 0.076), which was driven by the differences between hybrid and collared flycatcher males (est = 1.22+/-0.53, z = 2.30, p = 0.055), and somewhat between hybrid and pied males (est = 0.872+/-0.53, z = 1.65, p = 0.22).

The difference between Watch Period 1 and Watch Period 2 ( M = 62.46%, SD = 16.7%) was marginally significant, t (28) = 2.37, SEM = 2.83, p = .076, and the remaining comparison (2 vs. 3) was not significant ( p = .662).

Nearly all these estimated genetic correlations are substantially larger than 0 ( H 01 : ρ g = 0) but less than 1 ( H 02 : ρ g = 1) ( Figure 1A ); the only exception is the genetic correlation of HIP between males and females, which is marginally significant ( ρ ^ g = 0.919 and P = 0.076 for H 02 ).

Follow-up analyses showed the expected anterior distribution of the effect, as it was restricted to frontal sites, F(1,16) = 11.769, p = .003, η2 = .424 (marginally significant at central, F(1,16) = 3.592, p = .076, η2 = .183, and parietal sites, F(1,16) = 3.604, p = .076, η2 = .184).

We also compared memory accuracy within the same arousal condition, and found that there was a marginally significant difference in d-prime for objects in the cued location compared to the uncued location in the CS+ trials ( p = 0.076).

A cluster at 216–286 ms, reflecting a frontocentral positivity typical of a P3a response, was marginally significant (16/30 sensors, p = 0.076).

The intercept is negative and marginally significant ( P = 0.076), indicating a potential baseline effect.

Interestingly, we found a marginally significant difference between the subclinical and HC groups in the invariance test of network structure (M = 0.304, p = 0.076).

Subtype was significantly associated with tumor grade ( p = 0.0012) and positive lymph nodes ( p = 0.021), with a marginally significant association of tumor stage ( p = 0.076).

The main effect of neuroticism on the hands-on-steering-wheel time was marginally significant [ F (1,30) = 3.310, p = 0.076].

The direct effect of openness on PSY was marginally significant, β = 0.08, SE = 0.02, Z = 1.77, p =.076, suggesting partial and negative serial mediation.

Likewise, there was a marginally significant relationship between rural area residency (OR: 0.88; P = 0.076) and depression (OR: 0.74; P = 0.087) with short sleep duration.

The same association was marginally significant for the anterior midbody ( r = 0.417; p = 0.076).

Regarding anatomical location, there was a marginally significant difference (p = 0.076), with a tendency towards greater concentration in the calcaneus.

The Session x Run interaction for the linear contrast was marginally significant ( F [1] , [7] = 4.31, p = 076), reflecting the steeper increase in the first two sessions compared to Sessions 3 and 4.

Given the marginally significant effects of chlorpromazine equivalents ( P = 0.076) and gender ( P = 0.057) on negative symptoms in the univariate analyses, these variables were subsequently included in the multiple linear regression analyses.

Consistently, significant positive correlations were found between PANSS-G and the Frontal-Inf-Orb-R (r = 0.55, p = 0.006), PANSS-G and the Rolandic-Oper-R (r = 0.44, p = 0.047), and marginally significant correlation between PANSS-N and the Rolandic-Oper-R (r = 0.38, p = 0.076).

The mentioned decrease was marginally significant in taekwondo players after dough consumption ( P = 0.076), whereas there was a non-significant difference after carbohydrate drinking periods.

bivia was marginally significant in the raw ( p = 0.076) and adjusted ( p = 0.091) p values in more than 30% of the tested samples. 5.4.

Comparing the TIR/O Group to the XLH Group At the distal radius, compared with the XLH group, the TIR/O group showed significant or marginally significant differences only in a few trabecular parameters ( Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S1A ), such as lower trabecular number (-28.6%, p = 0.076), greater trabecular inhomogeneity (79.0%, p = 0.049), and larger trabecular separation (51.2%, p = 0.074).