“marginally significant”

There are significant and marginally significant differences in R Pi between the progeny from the immediate neighbor and intermediate neighbor treatments (paired t test, t = 3.524, p = .039) and the remote neighbor and intermediate neighbor treatments (paired t test, t = −2.534, p = .085), respectively (Table 3 ).

In addition, emotional well-being is marginally significant—Partial R-Sq. = 0.000, P = 0.0397 ( Table 3 ).

This is reflected in a marginally significant Wilcoxon test (p = 0.0399), suggesting that MCM7 may have slightly lower resolution at the subclade level compared to ITS or RPB2 .

Follow-up RM-ANOVAs demonstrated (a) a significant interaction between emotion and face action for both posing [ F (5.18, 341.52) = 37.65, p < .001, η p 2 = .36] and spoken [ F (5.52, 364.20) = 13.45, p < .001, η p 2 = .17] conditions, (b) a significant Emotion × Condition interaction for all face areas (all p s < .05; though the interaction for nose lengthening was marginally significant, p = .04), and (c) a significant Face Action × Condition interaction for happy [ F (2.94, 193.76) = 214.92, p < .001, η p 2 = .77], angry [ F (2.98, 196.62) = 393.56, p < .001, η p 2 = .86], and sad [ F (2.88, 189.95) = 255.84, p < .001, η p 2 = .80].

An update presented at the 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting [ 8 ] reported a marginally significant ( P = 0.04) survival advantage for lymph node positive patients treated with letrozole.

Secondly they showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.04) in the rate of lymph node involvement, with the highest being among Her2-overexpressing subtype (56%), followed by luminal B (47%), basal-like (41%), and luminal A (34%).

After sequential adjustment for demographic characteristics (sex, marital status, and race), smoking status, hearing impairment, and visual impairment (Models 2‐5), the HR for digital isolation was attenuated but remained marginally significant (eg, Model 5: HR 1.23; P =.04).

In spatio-temporal analysis, only a single large cluster (radius > 9 km) was found to be marginally significant (p = 0.04) during October 2011 (data not shown).

This relationship is marginally significant ( P = .04), suggesting a weak positive association between occupation and FABQ-PA.

Association of SNPs with PCa risk or disease aggressiveness When each of the SNPs was analyzed separately, age-adjusted logistic regression analysis demonstrated that Hispanic Caucasian carriers of the GG genotype when compared with the CC genotype showed a marginally significant decreased risk for PCa (OR = 0.31, P = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.10–0.96; Table IV ).

(We also found a marginally significant between-group difference in the right pallidum (SCZ median: 2.16, range: 2.067–2.215 vs HC median: 2.117, range: 1.927–2.184, U = 110, p = 0.040), however, we note that the comparison did not survive significance testing after removing an outlier from the HC group).

graecus ( P = 0.001) and one gene, TLR07 , showed a marginally significant excess of polymorphism ( P = 0.04) in L. v. graecus ( table 3 ).

In boys, a marginally significant difference between groups was present for age (p = 0.04) and BMI (p = 0.04), with higher baseline values among controls ( Table 2 ).

However, Tukey multiple comparison test showed a marginally significant difference in mean between the 2012–2017- and 2018–2024-year groups ( P = 0.04) in the coastal zone ( Fig. 4A ).

Marginally significant differences between the task-switch conditions were observed (F (2,68) = 3.37, p = 0.04, BF 10 = 0.64), although with inconclusive Bayes factor.

While the comparison between 2022 and 2023 was marginally significant ( p = 0.04).

Similarly, when shark were excluded from the analysis, the Se-Hg:Se relationship for fish became marginally significant (F 1,8 = 5.7, P = 0.04) and Se content explained 41% of the variation in molar Hg:Se.

A marginally significant difference in 16S rRNA copies per gram was detected at 0 dpi between non-MH (log 10 10.8±0.4 copies/g) and MH pigs (log 10 11.3±0.4 copies/g) (Kruskal-Wallis, P = 0.04) ( Figure S2 ).

However, after partialling out participants' age, only two correlation coefficients remained at least marginally significant: the relationship between L2 proficiency and τ in the congruent trials, r = −0.17, p = 0.04, and the relationship between L2 proficiency and τ in overall RT, r = −0.15, p = 0.07.

Additionally, this approach provided weak evidence for a causal association with mRNFL thickness, with a marginally significant IVW estimate (−0.98 μm per SD increase in the instrument; 95% CI, −1.89 to −0.07; P = 0.04) and consistent, albeit insignificant, estimates across all alternative MR methods.

When analysed according to study design, a significant increase in maternal homocysteine was observed among prospective studies (RoM: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.14–1.44, P = 3.2 × 10 −5 ), with a marginally significant effect among retrospective studies (RoM = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00–1.14, P = 0.04) ( Figure 1 ).

Relationships between cooperativity and specialization versus network node and edge counts were either statistically significant or marginally significant (p = 0.04 and 0.06, 0.07 and 0.11, respectively) ( Fig. 4C, 4D ).

The MRF-26 Total and SRI Summary significantly worsened from 44.9 ± 24.3 to 52.1 ± 26.2 ( p < 0.001) and from 55.0 ± 17.0 to 51.6 ± 18.0 ( p =0.010), respectively, while the SGRQ total showed a marginally significant deterioration from 62.5 ± 15.3 to 65.1 ± 16.9 ( p =0.040) ( Table 6 ).

4 ; and Table 2 –30-day unplanned readmission; Table 3 –30-day mortality; and Additional file 2 : Table S2–30-day unplanned readmission/mortality) showed the proportion of overall variation in outcomes explained by variation between hospitals (Model 1) was not statistically significant for unplanned readmission (ICC = .0205, p = 0.12) or mortality (ICC = 0.0000), while the between-hospital variation in the combined readmission/mortality outcome was marginally significant in the null model, explaining 3.0% of the total variance in outcomes ( p = 0.04).

Only the input resistance showed a marginally significant difference for the PD29–31 groups (sham 111 ± 12 MΩ vs. verum 148 ± 10 MΩ, p = 0.04). iTBS Effects on sPSCs The analysis of spontaneous synaptic currents was performed on a different set of animals and Cy3-WFA-labeled cells to prevent changes in the physiological conditions of the small FSI due to long recording times.