Additionally, a marginally significant association was observed between the two groups of VDBP for BMI (p = 0.04) and WHR (p = 0.05).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Thbs1-/- cells in clusters 12 and 14 showed marginally significant depletion of the BMP4 signature (p=0.04 and p=0.023, respectively).
One locus, TpMSAT05, exhibited a marginally significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) ( χ 2 = 16.44, DF = 8, P = 0.04), though this deviation was not significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (corrected α = 0.013).
Cognitive empathy Four-way interaction A marginally significant four-way interaction emerged; that is, participant culture × participant sex × stimulus ethnicity × stimulus sex [ F (1, 2,873.98) = 4.24, p = 0.040].
When each of the SNPs was analysed separately, marginally significant differences were observed for allele frequencies between sporadic cases and controls for three consecutive SNPs (−1001C/T, −263G/A, and −13C/T, P =0.04–0.07).
However, on average, oncologists gave lower scores to females more often than males ( P =0.04; marginally significant).
Additionally, this approach provided weak evidence for a causal association with mRNFL thickness, with a marginally significant IVW estimate (−0.98 μm per SD increase in the instrument; 95% CI, −1.89 to −0.07; P = 0.04) and consistent, albeit insignificant, estimates across all alternative MR methods.
Fisher’s combined probability test did not show statistically significant evidence for association ( P = 0.54); yet, Stouffer’s Z score method which considers the direction of association showed a marginally significant collective evidence for association with SDR at these 34 loci ( P = 0.04).
While performance expectancy was marginally significant in Model 2 (OR = 1.202, P = 0.04), it did not retain significance in Model 3.
Differences in genetic diversity across populations were marginally nonsignificant when heterozygosity was considered ( F 5,35 = 2.32, P = 0.06) and marginally significant for allelic richness ( F 5,35 = 2.58, P = 0.04).
There were marginally significant differences between follow-up and lost participants with respect to age ( P =.04).
The expiration/inspiration ratio showed a marginally significant benefit (WMD = 0.05, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.09, P = 0.040).
Analysis of follow-up scores without normalisation for interval to follow-up showed an almost identical pattern of significance, the only difference being a marginally significant difference for ACE-R score between visits in the PSP group (p=0.04).
rCBF significantly decreased after mild water intoxication (Figure 2c bottom , e, g) in both genotypes, reaching a plateau of −44.6 ± 3.5% and −35.6 ± 3.96% already within 15 min., with a small and marginally significant difference between the genotypes in accumulated rCBF reduction after WI (+7.56 ± 3.49% in WT compared to Aqp4 −/− , p = .04, Figure 2e ).
Therefore, M3 appeared to be the best fitting model in terms of parsimony, although M4 showed marginally significant improvement as compared to M3 ( p = .04 using one-tailed test) which may also deserve attention.
Finally, the potential overlap of participants in the studies included in our meta‐analysis may have contributed to the marginally significant findings of plasma Aβ42 between the DS with and without AD groups ( z = 2.03, p = 0.04). 4.2 Tau In this meta‐analysis, we examined two forms of tau and found no significant differences in plasma t‐tau (non‐phosphorylated tau) and p‐tau181 (phosphorylated tau) concentrations between the DS population and the euploid controls.
However, the correlation was marginally significant ( r = 0.19, p = 0.04) ( Figure 7 B), while no correlation was observed with longitude for HSW ( r = 0.17, p = 0.06).
This association remains marginally significant ( P =0.04) after the application of a Bonferroni correction.
Experiment 2: Epifauna (Core Samples) For core-sampled epifauna in Experiment 2, the only community metric on which landscape size had a marginally significant effect was community evenness ( P = 0.04, Fig 8C ).
Age was also a marginally significant moderator of the association between cognitive self-consciousness and emotion-focused coping, F (1, 334) = 2.69, p = .04, Δ R 2 = 0.01, with a significant relationship only seen in the younger group, b = 0.28, p = .009, not the older group, p > .05. 3.3.
The results showed that with radical awareness being considered, the effect of Radical Presence became non-significant, p = 0.14, and the effect of Visual Complexity became marginally significant, p = 0.04, η 2 = 0.13.
Increasing the curing time from 20 to 40 seconds had a marginally significant effect ( p ≤ 0.040) on the DC of both bulk fill and universal studied RBC samples.
The secondary vectors mean outdoor host-seeking densities were marginally significant compared to the indoor densities for An. maculipalpis ( t 9 = 1.96, p < 0.04) and An. coustani s.l.
There was a marginally significant effect of NA treatment ( X 2 = 8.5, df = 3, P = 0.04).
The pairs of results for Ch(N2)T (Teams 1, 7) and for T340 (Teams 7, 10) were quite comparable; while the somewhat greater difference for the TOT result pair (Teams 8, 18), was marginally significant ( p = 0.04).