“marginally significant”

Errors are higher in the HTN group (0.39) than in the non-HTN group (0.13), with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.080) and a medium effect size (0.258).

Adding the three feeding style predictors in the final block led to a significant increase in prediction ( p < .05) that appeared to be largely due to the indulgent feeding style (although this predictor was marginally significant, p = .08).

An exact logistic regression analysis revealed that the difference in the percentage of treatment failures between parasite groups was marginally significant ( p = 0.08).

In perennial Sundanian grasses, variation across treatments was marginally significant ( F = 2.62, df = 5, p = 0.08), with the greatest change in the E5 treatment plots.

Connections to the sensorimotor cortex were marginally significant ( p = 0.08) with greater connectivity again in the low compared to the high mindfulness groups.

For sample 1, the overall model was marginally significant ( F (2, 210) = 2.59; p = 0.08), with a negative but non-significant linear effect ( t = −1.46; ns ), and a significant accelerating quadratic effect, ( t = 2.28; p < 0.05); and for sample 2, the overall model was significant ( F (2, 160) = 5.34; p = 0.006), with a negative but non-significant linear effect ( t = −1.32; ns ), and a significant accelerating quadratic effect, ( t = 3.03; p = 0.003).

Cortisol awakening response was marginally significant for yoga (p=0.08).

all post-VHFS blocks was marginally significant ( p = 0.08), indicating a trend toward overall increase in alpha ERD following VHFS.

A linear mixed model using the full sample (Time 1: TD N = 61, autism N = 66; Time 2: TD N = 43, autism N = 47; Time 3: TD N = 31, autism N = 30) revealed a time X hemisphere interaction ( F (2, 414.82) = 4.35, p = 0.01) and a marginally significant group X hemisphere interaction ( F (1, 414.80) = 3.05, p = 0.08).

There was also a marginally significant Avoidance × Anxiety effect, p = .08.

Moreover, besides major effects of the substrate, multifactor MANOVA revealed significant effects of intercropping (culture form) on Mn in leaves ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant effects on Ca ( p = 0.08), while in the tillers, concentrations of P and Fe exhibited significant substrate–culture interactions, indicating that the effect of culture form depends on the growth substrate.

Analysing each of the soundscape scales individually through a factorial ANCOVA test found a marginally significant result for the calmness scale ( df = 1, F = 9.91, p = 0.08).

The type of justification was found to be marginally significant in RS, F (2, 158) = 2.52, p = .08, η2 = .031.

T4 showed a trend of increase in the SGA, AGA, and LGA groups, although the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.080).

Consequently, the small-worldness parameter was found to be greater in the CON network than in the BC network and the observed difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.08 ).

We found a significant interaction between group and item related to biological properties [F (2, 86) = 3.414, P<.04], and a marginally significant interaction with perceptual properties [F (2, 86) = 2.714, P<.08].

For the DLPFC, there was a marginally significant scan × perceived criticism × valence effect, F (19,679.0) = 1.49, p = . 08 and significant perceived criticism × valence effect, F (1, 429.4) = 19.9, p <.0005 with a larger PC differential response in the criticism condition than in the praise condition.

However, a marginally significant Emotion × Load × Duration interaction was present, F (1, 10) = 3.82, p = 0.08, and post hoc analyses showed that this interaction was driven by an Emotion × Load interaction for short duration items, F (1, 10) = 7.84, p = 0.02.

PCoA plots by Bray–Curtis distance revealed a marginally significant difference in microorganism composition between the benefit and resistance groups (adonis P = 0.08) but no significant difference between the benefit group and the severe irAE group (adonis P = 0.91).

This analysis revealed a significant main effect of session (F(1,70) = 37.52, p<0.001, η 2 =0.202) and a marginally significant main effect of condition (F(2, 70)=2.66, p=0.08, η 2 =0.028), with no significant interaction between condition and session (F(2, 70)=1.82, p=0.17, η 2 =0.020).

There was a marginally significant association between current PTSD diagnosis and the PCL-5≥31 cutoff (χ2 1 =3.10; P =.08).

The mean number of barriers reported was significantly ( P < 0.05) higher for women compared to men in the 60–69 year age groups and marginally significant in the 70–79 and 80 years and over groups ( P = 0.08).

= 0.04, t (17) = 3.66, p<.001) and marginally significant increases in life satisfaction (γ 00 = 0.09, S.E. = 0.05, t (17) = 1.73, p = .08) and happiness (γ 00 = 0.11, S.E. = 0.08, t (17) = 1.50, p = .13).

The same pattern of results was obtained when analyses were limited to CN participants, with significant PP X Age X APOE interaction effects on the Picture Sequence Memory Test ( β = 0.17; p = .039) and the Cognitive Function Composite: β = 0.17; p = .042), and marginally significant PP X Age X APOE interaction effects on the List Sorting Working Memory Test ( β = 0.14; p = .080) and the Fluid Cognition Composite ( β = 0.15; p = .058).

Second, the interaction effect of education and perceived ability on physician trust was marginally significant ( B = −0.07, SE = 0.05, p = 0.08); the association between perceived ability and physician trust was stronger for physicians with low levels of education (simple slope = 0.41, t = 9.14, p < 0.001) than for those with high levels of education (simple slope = 0.31, t = 6.03, p < 0.001).