“marginally significant”

Machinery was consistently the leading mechanism of injury, and its increase over the study period was marginally significant ( p -value = 0.08).

After including local percentage of exotic species as a covariate all these relationships remained significant or marginally significant at P < 0.08.

In contrast, the “tomentosus” × “grandiflorum” had marginally significant lower relative fecundity compared with the “tomentosus” control cross (estimate = 0.29 ± 0.069, t = −1.766, p = 0.08).

One outcome – any cannabis use – showed a marginally significant decline at follow-up (p=0.08).

We found statistically significant difference in the quadratic association of SCQ total score with the PSI parent domain scores ( P =0.049 for the interaction between the country of residence and SCQ total score), as well as a marginally significant difference in the quadratic association of SCQ total score with PSI total scores (Overall interaction P =0.08) between the U.S. and Japan.

The increase in rates was statistically significant for larger hospitals (p < 0.001) and marginally significant for small hospitals (p = 0.08).

Consequently, the small-worldness parameter was found to be greater in the CON network than in the BC network and the observed difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.08 ).

For sample 1, the overall model was marginally significant ( F (2, 210) = 2.59; p = 0.08), with a negative but non-significant linear effect ( t = −1.46; ns ), and a significant accelerating quadratic effect, ( t = 2.28; p < 0.05); and for sample 2, the overall model was significant ( F (2, 160) = 5.34; p = 0.006), with a negative but non-significant linear effect ( t = −1.32; ns ), and a significant accelerating quadratic effect, ( t = 3.03; p = 0.003).

Alkaline phosphatase was marginally significant in this model ( P = 0.080), which may be attributed to the fact that total lithotripsy time, as a continuous variable, is slightly less sensitive to this indicator than the number of lithotripsy sessions.

The interaction between PVC and baseline hypertension was marginally significant ( P =0.08).

Those who had attended continuing education on health literacy outside of school (M = 9.40, SD = 2.81) reported using a higher number of communication techniques routinely as compared to those who did not (M = 8.91, SD = 3.15) although this result was a marginally significant difference, t(449) = −1.74, p = .08, d = −.17.

This reduction was significantly modulated by rs2180619 genotype regarding the threat cue (cue FPS: F 1,138 =4.79, P =0.03, η 2 =0.03) and marginally significant for the threat context (context FPS: F 1,138 =3.1, P =0.08, η 2 =0.02).

(We thank Todd Hare for generously sharing a mask of this ROI with us.) In Dataset 1 (unregulated altruistic choice), we replicated the result from the main manuscript that the dlPFC is more activated on generous compared to selfish choices (t 43 =2.09, p=0.04, Appendix 2—figure 1g ), and similarly observed a marginally significant correlation with difference in weights on self vs. other (r=–0.27, p=0.08).

The marginally significant interaction between body part and emotion F (2, 68) = 2.62, p = 0.080 however, suggests that the main effect of emotion is driven by the facial expression.

The ART group experienced a reduction in weekly income from a mean of 33,775 Ush at baseline to 29,481 Ush at month 6, which was marginally significant ( P = .08), but then increased to an average weekly income of 38,516 Ush at month 12; this change from month 6 to 12 was also marginally significant ( P = .08), but the income level at month 12 was now back to an equivalent level as that at baseline ( P = .81).

In a reduced model where only promotion success, rs4680 genotype, and the interaction were entered, the overall model fit was marginally significant: F (3, 55) = 2.39, p < .08, R 2 = 0.12.

Controlling for demographic characteristics of age, gender, family status, and stage of training did not contribute to any statistically significant changes in the model, with one exception of the direct effect of maladaptive perfectionism on current suicidal ideation, which became marginally significant ( B = 0.06, SE = 0.03, p = 0.080).

Cortisol awakening response was marginally significant for yoga (p=0.08).

We found marginally significant ( p = 0.08) effect modification by substance use diagnosis status in this exploratory process evaluation.

Choice horizon was a significant positive predictor of pupil size at bin −6 ( β = 51.32, p = 0.016) and bin −1 ( β = 21.80, p = 0.039), with a marginally significant effect at bin 0 ( β = 18.25, p = 0.08).

Marginally significant decrease was observed only for P. sergenti ( p = 0.08) ( Figure 3 B).

In the SCD-MCI group, the lonely patients were older, had fewer years of education, had lower ADAS-Jcog baseline scores, and had a greater annual degree of change in ADAS-Jcog score, although this was marginally significant ( P = 0.08, Cohen’s d = − 0.801).

We found that interdependence significantly increased with relatedness in the 48 hr experiments [both, r 2 (44)>0.11, p<0.02], and this was marginally significant in the 5 min experiments [both r 2 (44)<0.06, 0.07<p < 0.08] ( Figure 3B ).

all post-VHFS blocks was marginally significant ( p = 0.08), indicating a trend toward overall increase in alpha ERD following VHFS.

attachment styles consumer behavior life history risk-sensitivity risk-taking When risk-taking tendency was individually tested across domains, similar interactions were found in the domains of ethics, recreation, gambling, and investment domains (marginally significant, p = 0.08), but not in the domains of social and health.