“marginally significant”

For regret (step 1: R 2 = 0.15, p = 0.076, step 2: Δ R 2 = 0.08, p = 0.082) there was a marginally significant two-way interaction between behavior and anticipated emotion in the reverse direction, β = −0.51, SE = 0.28, p = 0.082.

BMI exhibited a marginally significant negative association ( p = 0.082).

Interestingly, while patients with high DKK3 mRNA expression showed marginally significant lower chance of having recurrence presented as new neoplastic events post initial therapy ( p = 0.082), Patients with higher TGFB1 mRNA expression showed a significant higher chance of recurrence presented as new neoplastic events post initial therapy compared with patients with low TGFB1 mRNA expression ( p < 0.001).

Interestingly, we found a marginally significant correlation ( p < 0.082) of MMP10 transcript expression with lymph node metastasis in both analyses (Table 1 ).

The model for frailty was marginally significant, F(9, 119) = 1.77, p = 0.082, with an adjusted R2 of 5.1%.

Barbel annual size increment was positively correlated to the proportion of days with discharge equal to zero recorded in T9 (Pearson’s r = 0.773; P = 0.024), whereas a marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.602; P = 0.082) was found between chub increment and air temperature measured in St.

η p 2 = 0.418), the interaction between prime rhythm pattern and ROI was not significant ( F (16, 400) = 0.881, p = 0.592, η p 2 = 0.034), the interaction between target rhythm pattern and ROI was marginally significant ( F (8, 200) = 1.783, p = 0.082, η p 2 = 0.067), and the interaction among the prime rhythm pattern, target rhythm pattern, and ROI was not significant ( F (16, 400) = 1.000, p = 0.455, η p 2 = 0.038).

However, only a marginally significant p-value (p=0.082 using the log-rank test) was observed compared with the CCRT group (estimated OS of 68.7 months vs. 59.8 months).

Finally, the Group × Testing point x Problem size interaction was marginally significant ( F (1, 22) = 3.33, n2p = 0.20, p < 0.082), showing that the problem size effect in Kindergarten was higher in keepers (+43% for small problems, F = 21.29, p < 0.001) than in stoppers (+23%, F = 7.05, p = 0.014), whereas in Grade 2, the problem size effect was still present in stoppers (+9% for small problems, F = 7.49, p = 0.012), but not in keepers (+2%, F < 1). 3.3.

When controlling for depressed mood, the association between trait rumination and bedtime cortisol levels was marginally significant ( β = 0.053, F (1, 521) = 3.03, p = 0.082).

000) and marginally significant in Spain ( M men = 2 . 84 , SD = 2 . 43; M women = 2 . 50 , SD = 1 . 99; t = 1 . 75 , p = . 082).

First, we evaluate ‘confounding effect.’ Among the unmeasured variable, history of hypertension (HTN) and number of endovascular managements were marginally significant (HR, 0.194; 95% CI, 0.031–1.239; P = 0.082 and HR, 0.600; 95% CI, 0.420–0.858; P = 0.057).

A marginally significant effect was observed in training condition [ p = 0.082, 95% CI = (−0.23, 0.01); wide – small], demonstrating that the small target group performed more corrective movements aiming to the test targets.

The difference between the two prime structures was marginally significant ( p = 0.0820).

Duration of Prior LUTS Our study found a marginally significant correlation (P=0.0822; RR, 1.867; 95% CI, 0.680 to 5.119) between duration of LUTS less than 3 months and successful TWOC.

There was a marginally significant difference in ethnicity distribution between the two groups (P = 0.08271), with a slightly higher percentage of Hispanic or Latino patients in the dexmedetomidine group (2.4%) compared to the non-dexmedetomidine group (0.5%).

There was a marginally significant difference for V3, F (7, 1) = 4.082, p = 0.083.

Supporting these findings, model testing with LTT generated a statistically significant better fit of the birth–death model (speciation + extinction) over the speciation-only Yule model (likelihood ratio test chi 2 p value 0.030), and the Pybus-Harvey gamma statistic was positive (1.7347), indicating that the speciation rate was initially low and subsequently increased (though this statistic was marginally significant at p = 0.083).

Additionally, it was determined that the mediation effect of the GC response on the Ac-H3 expression was marginally significant ( p = 0.083) and accounted for approximately 62% of the total effect relative to its indirect effect, suggesting that the GC response may influence the Ac-H3 expression indirectly through altering the expression of NF-κB.

However, a marginally significant association was found between the rs6505162AA/AC genotype and increased PTB risk for those aged ⩾60 years (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 0.93–3.06), P = 0.083.

In the baseline-adjusted ANCOVA, intervention group differences at week 4 were marginally significant ( p = 0.083), and reached significance ( p = 0.009) after including covariates (BMI, p = 0.008).

This revealed a marginally significant effect of group, F (2, 28) = 2.7, p = 0.083.

However, these main effects need to be qualified by the marginally significant interaction between group and picture type, F (1, 62) = 3.11, p = .083, η p 2 = .048, which was of moderate effect size.

Notably, the impact of PSMA PET-CT staging on BRFS was marginally significant in the univariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR) 0.428, p = 0.083, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.159–1.150). 3.5.

Posthoc tests using Sidak corrections showed that there was a marginally significant difference between the ADHD group and the TD group ( p = .083), and between the ASD group and the TD group ( p = .055), with both the ADHD and ASD group having higher proportions of negative, non-mental descriptions.