“marginally significant”

The interaction effects showed that all pairwise interactions between the factors were significant: the interaction between participant group and occlusion was significant F(2,118) = 3.910, p = 0.023,η 2 p = 0.062 ; the interaction between group and emotion was marginally significant F(2,118) = 2.923, p = 0.058,η 2 p = 0.047; and the interaction between occlusion and emotion was highly significant F(4,236) = 86.601, p < 0.001,η 2 p = 0.595.

However, significant group differences emerged in post-test scores: negative affect ( F (2, 124) = 5.56, p = .002, η 2 = 0.099), social connectedness ( F (2, 124) = 2.67, p = .073, η 2 = 0.009, marginally significant), state resilience ( F (2, 124) = 7.00, p = .001, η 2 = 0.009), and trait resilience ( F (2, 124) = 3.34, p = .039, η 2 = 0.009), suggesting that the intervention had a significant impact on key variables. 3.3.2.

A main effect of session was also significant or marginally significant (cooling, Pz: F(4,72) = 5.4, p < 0.001, T3: F(4,72) = 2.9, p = 0.028, T4: F(4,72) = 5.0, p = 0.0013; heating, Pz: F(4,72) = 2.2, p = 0.076, T3: F(4,72) = 4.2, p = 0.0040, T4: F(4,72) = 7.1, p < 0.001).

Figure 4 shows scatterplots of the associations of each genetic variant plotted against their association with stroke subtypes for all traits that had significant ( P < 3.85 × 10 −4 ) or marginally significant ( P < 1 × 10 −3 ) associations: plateletcrit (PCT), neutrophil percentage of granulocytes (NEUT%GRAN), eosinophil percentage of white cells (EO%), factor VIII activity, factor VIII antigen, factor XI activity, gamma (γ′) fibrinogen, protein C (PC) activity, and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor activation peptide antigen (TAFI-AP:Ag).

The fungal community composition during macrophyte decomposition was significantly affected by time and displayed a marginally significant effect of light treatment (Table 2 , significant dbRDA model; F (3,39) = 4.61, P = 0.001).

Although marginally significant ( p = 0.001), the height of transgenic plants was only 8% lower than that of Columbia compared to ∼40% reduction seen in 3KO plants (Figure 1 E).

After controlling for potential confounders, significant or marginally significant and positive associations were observed between dietary intakes of total protein (standardized coefficient, β = 0.104 and 0.118, p < 0.001), animal protein ( β = 0.073 and 0.067, p < 0.05), and protein from white meat ( β = 0.074 and 0.067, p < 0.01) with changes in BMD at the femur neck and trochanter, respectively.

The associated factors with the prevalence of allergic rhinitis were carpet (odds ratio [OR]: 1.79, p = 0.001), residential area (marginally significant), duration of residence (OR: 1.09, p < 0.001).

Statistically, differences between +snow and control plots were marginally significant in June 2006 ( F 1,6 = 3.773, P = 0.100) and highly significant in April 2008 ( F 1,6 = 40.60, P < 0.001).

A three-way ANOVA revealed marginally significant effects of pattern (F = 4.07, p = 0.052) and curing temperature (F = 3.48, p = 0.071), as well as a highly significant interaction between pattern and temperature (F = 12.28, p = 0.001), indicating that increasing the curing temperature from 75 °C to 90 °C substantially enhances the benefit of the hexagonal suction-cup geometry.

The only minor change was observed in the energy saving problem, with cued recall (Δ R 2 = 0.024, p = 0.075), verbal fluency (Δ R 2 = 0.042, p = 0.059), and knowledge/experience (Δ R 2 = 0.062, p = 0.012) all showing marginally significant or significant effects, but ideation fluency still contributing more than the sum of these effects (Δ R 2 = 0.168, p < 0.001).

However, using a Bonferroni correction and corresponding alpha of 0.001, lifetime history of major depressive disorder and persistent depressive disorder was the only disorders significantly correlated with misophonia severity, and the correlation with current OCD was marginally significant ( p = 0.001).

All the main effects and interactions were highly significant, p < 0.001, except for the age group x target congruency interaction, which was marginally significant, F (1, 45) = 3.46, MSE < 0.001, p = 0.069.

Two-way interaction terms between the forest patch coverage-banana crops and the dam surface-banana crops variables also appeared marginally significant to explain the increase of BU in Côte d'Ivoire, with odds-ratio 1.0067 ( P <0.001; near 0.6%) and 1.0588 ( P <0.001; near an order of 6%), respectively.

In the pRDA, the significance of RDA1 to RDA4 was confirmed through ANOVA ( p < 0.05), with RDA1 and RDA2 being highly significant ( p < 0.001), RDA3 significant ( p < 0.01) and RDA4 marginally significant ( p = 0.016) (Supplementary Data 8 ).

There was no correlation between PA diameter or PA ratio and symptom duration in patients with CHD‐PAH or CTD‐PAH, although there was a marginally significant correlation in IPAH patients ( r = 0.286, p < 0.001).

While the effect was marginally significant at the lowest satisfaction threshold (AOR = 0.97, p = 0.056), it became a highly significant barrier to reaching higher satisfaction levels once patients moved past the ‘Very Dissatisfied’ stage (AOR = 0.97, p < 0.001) (Table 6 ).

While the MR‐Egger analysis result was marginally significant, the BMI effect on UEC in IVW analysis remained significant ( P = .0010) after Bonferroni's correction considering the number of phenotypes and methods ( P < .05/10 = .005).

A probability of p < 0.10 was considered as marginally significant, of p < 0.05 as significant, of p < 0.01 as highly significant and of p < 0.001 as extremely significant.

In the MAR model, the main factor, time ( X 2 (4) = 8.396, p = 0.078), again is marginally significant, and the interaction between time and baseline HbA1c class ( X 2 (4) = 19.849, p = 0.001) as well as the baseline HbA1c class ( X 2 (1) = 104.195, p < 0.001) are significant.

Whereas the groups UW, NW, and OW showed marginally significant effects around β 1y = 0.001, a substantially higher effect was present in the OB group ( β 1y = 0.003, 95% CI 0.001–0.004; p < 0.001).

The threshold for statistical significance was set at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, with *p < 0.05 considered marginally significant, **p < 0.01 deemed highly significant, and ***p < 0.001 regarded as extremely significant.

5, p = 0.010)], negative perception toward DD [schizophrenia (β = 0.43, p < 0.001), ASD (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), and ADHD (β = 0.40, p < 0.001)], the perception of the child psychiatrist of parents as being in opposition to the diagnosis [(schizophrenia: β = 0.48, p < 0.001; ASD: β = 0.23, p = 0.038, marginally significant after Bonferroni correction; ADHD: β = 0.35, p < 0.001)], and the presence of siblings with one of the three diagnoses in the patient's family [(schizophrenia: β = 0.46, p < 0.001; ASD: β = 0.28, p = 0.019, marginally significant; ADHD: β = 0.28, p = 0.009)].

However, the predicted interaction between compensation and nation remained marginally significant, although the effect of compensation was slightly stronger among Americans, t (50) = 12.15, p < 0.001, d = 1.63, than among Japanese t (49) = 8.54, p < 0.001, d = 1.22.

Results from a combined analysis of the five DSat‐28 scales identified significant or marginally significant relationships with weight loss for the scales of Healthy Lifestyle ( P < 0.001), Eating Out ( P = 0.04) and Preoccupation with Food ( P = 0.05).