“marginally significant”

Predicted “neutral” community classes included the third community class identified on alginate particles, which colonized these particles from time 0–12 h (empirical- p > 0.20); the first community class on chitosan (0–48 h, marginally significant; empirical- p = 6 × 10 −4 for the local model); and chitin was again an exception, with the first community class appearing neutral (defined along the whole trajectory, empirical- p > 0.8).

When comparing percent change in weight and fat mass with baseline variables to identify potential predictive biomarkers, one MS peak was marginally significant in the full analysis, α-aminoadipate (R 2 = 0.29, p = 0.0007).

24 hpi We identified no significantly enriched GO terms at 24 hpi that met our criteria ( q < 0.05); however, the term “oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH–CH group of donors” was marginally significant ( p = 0.000739 and q = 0.06498).

Additionally, patients with high RUNX2 mRNA expression showed marginally significant event-free survival compared to those with low RUNX2 expression (raw p -value=7.56×10 -4 , Bonferroni p -value=0.055) (Figure 9B). miR-378, a microRNA, antagonizes RUNX2 mRNA and protein expression in SCC cell lines ( 46 ).

Notably, LIHC and TGCT alone each show marginally significant correlation between the G>T/C>A mismatch ratio and pass variant call ratio by reference strand (Pearson correlation = 0.295 and 0.212, P = 9.75e-4 and 4.46e-2, respectively).

Additionally, we observed a marginally significant increase in the distribution of H4 (TGTCCG) and H10 (CGTCCG) in RA compared with that in the controls (H4 : p = 0.001, OR [95%CI] = 1.13 [0.77–1.26]; H10: p = 0.001, OR [95%CI] = 1.15 [1.02–1.56]) (Table 4 ).

The fungal community composition during macrophyte decomposition was significantly affected by time and displayed a marginally significant effect of light treatment (Table 2 , significant dbRDA model; F (3,39) = 4.61, P = 0.001).

After correction for multiple testing, a single interaction model in males composed of EOD, African ancestry, and socioeconomic status was marginally significant (IG = 5.11%, permutation unadj. p = 0.001) (Table 3 B).

For the EOS, a likelihood ratio test showed that the interaction between flow regime and drought status was marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 10.59, p = 0.001).

However, using a Bonferroni correction and corresponding alpha of 0.001, lifetime history of major depressive disorder and persistent depressive disorder was the only disorders significantly correlated with misophonia severity, and the correlation with current OCD was marginally significant ( p = 0.001).

The difference in JND was highly significant after adaptation to fast translational motion (baseline vs 20 Hz translation: p < 0.001) and marginally significant after adaptation to fast circular motion (baseline vs 20 Hz circular: p = 0.06).

There was significant main effect of perceptual load, F (1, 19) = 290.86, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.94, with faster RTs in the low load condition (631 ms) than in the high load condition (1207 ms); and, there was also a marginally significant main effect of singleton distractor presence, F (1, 19) = 17.72, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.48, with RTs in the neutral distractor condition (937 ms) being slower than RTs in the singleton distractor absent condition (901 ms).

We observed highly significant overlap between the two sets of genes at 29°C (P = 3.58E-07) and marginally significant overlap at 21°C (P = 0.001), which is consistent with our SNP-based analysis.

Two-way mixed ANOVAs of time allocation showed in the IG group, a marginally significant main effect of activity ( F (3, 525) = 8.847, p < 0.001) and a highly significant interaction between activity and NAM ( F (3, 525) = 14.791, p < 0.001).

Results from a combined analysis of the five DSat‐28 scales identified significant or marginally significant relationships with weight loss for the scales of Healthy Lifestyle ( P < 0.001), Eating Out ( P = 0.04) and Preoccupation with Food ( P = 0.05).

The magnitudes of effects for these respondents who believe that an HIV-positive teacher should continue teaching attenuated by 10% and further 5% with the introduction of demographic and socioeconomic measures respectively, turning the previously highly significant estimate (OR=1.46, p≤0.001) into significant (OR=1.31, p≤0.05) and marginally significant (OR=1.24, p≤0.10) when comparing the coefficients in Model 1 to Model 2 and Model 2 to Model 3.

The main effect of pulse rate was highly significant ( F (2,20) = 99.3, P < 0.001) and that of duration was marginally significant ( F (1,10) = 4.76, P = 0.054).

While the MR‐Egger analysis result was marginally significant, the BMI effect on UEC in IVW analysis remained significant ( P = .0010) after Bonferroni's correction considering the number of phenotypes and methods ( P < .05/10 = .005).

One‐sided likelihood‐ratio (LR) tests pursued to evaluate the statistical significance of the family variance for survival showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) results for the unbrowsed planting in both species, but marginally significant ( p = 0.046) and non‐significant ( p > 0.05) results in the browsed planting in E. ovata and E. pauciflora , respectively (Table S8 ).

Marginally significant differences existed between T2 sound earlier and T2 sound later conditions ( t (68) = −3.38, p = 0.001, Cohen’s D = −0.81, 95% CI = [−0.276, −0.071]).

Statistically, differences between +snow and control plots were marginally significant in June 2006 ( F 1,6 = 3.773, P = 0.100) and highly significant in April 2008 ( F 1,6 = 40.60, P < 0.001).

An initial multivariate statistical analysis (perMANOVA) on fungal community structure related to compartments and sampling dates revealed highly significant differences between compartments (F = 0.29521, p = 0.001) and marginally significant differences between sampling dates (F = 0.21081, p = 0.052).

These effects are marginally significant ( P = 0.095), but the genetic effects due to differences among four QTL genotype combinations C/C, C/T, T/C, and T/T are highly significant for both species ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 4a ).

Index values and mortality For both species, insecticide and exposure time were highly significant ( p < 0.001), while concentration was marginally significant for T. castaneum ( p = 0.036) and non-significant for T. confusum ( p = 0.161).

Direct effects, from prenatal exposure to childhood ARS, were marginally significant at ages 6 (p-value 0.060) and 8 (p-value < 0.001).