“marginally significant”

Analogous treatments performed on the selected 8 extracts identified significant down-regulation of aflM (respectively: 57.5, 17.6, 19.8, 109.6, 18.9, 30.4, 3.7, 11.2 times (all p < 0.001)) and marginally significant down-regulation of aflR (respectively: 9.1, 2.6, 1.9, 6.6, 2.0, 8.6, 1.4, 2.6 times (all 0.01 < p < 0.001)).

In the MAR model, the main factor, time ( X 2 (4) = 8.396, p = 0.078), again is marginally significant, and the interaction between time and baseline HbA1c class ( X 2 (4) = 19.849, p = 0.001) as well as the baseline HbA1c class ( X 2 (1) = 104.195, p < 0.001) are significant.

A main effect of session was also significant or marginally significant (cooling, Pz: F(4,72) = 5.4, p < 0.001, T3: F(4,72) = 2.9, p = 0.028, T4: F(4,72) = 5.0, p = 0.0013; heating, Pz: F(4,72) = 2.2, p = 0.076, T3: F(4,72) = 4.2, p = 0.0040, T4: F(4,72) = 7.1, p < 0.001).

The Mann–Whitney U test showed that the difference in physical and emotional violence was marginally significant ( U = 81,225.000, p = 0.051), whereas the difference in sexual violence was highly significant ( U = 74,258.500, p < 0.001), with females scoring higher.

In multivariate regression analysis, marginally significant positive relationships were found between serum indium and urine indium levels ( P < 0.001), SP-A levels ( P = 0.037), IL-1β levels ( P = 0.043), IL-6 levels ( P = 0.008), PDW levels ( P = 0.029), TP levels ( P = 0.017).

Indeed, the two additional tryptophan residues lead to a significant difference in amino acid composition between the two putative ND6 variants (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.0181), which, in turn, explain the marginally significant difference in hydrophobicity (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.0580) and the highly significant differences in physicochemical features estimated by the Grantham [ 86 ] chemical distance (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001) and the Schneider and Wrede [ 87 ] physicochemical distance (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.001).

5, p = 0.010)], negative perception toward DD [schizophrenia (β = 0.43, p < 0.001), ASD (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), and ADHD (β = 0.40, p < 0.001)], the perception of the child psychiatrist of parents as being in opposition to the diagnosis [(schizophrenia: β = 0.48, p < 0.001; ASD: β = 0.23, p = 0.038, marginally significant after Bonferroni correction; ADHD: β = 0.35, p < 0.001)], and the presence of siblings with one of the three diagnoses in the patient's family [(schizophrenia: β = 0.46, p < 0.001; ASD: β = 0.28, p = 0.019, marginally significant; ADHD: β = 0.28, p = 0.009)].

The first model shows that predisposing characteristics accounted for a marginally significant amount of variance in the outcome (Nagelkerke pseudo- R 2 = 0.0161; P < 0.001), representing approximately 2% of the variance.

While the effect was marginally significant at the lowest satisfaction threshold (AOR = 0.97, p = 0.056), it became a highly significant barrier to reaching higher satisfaction levels once patients moved past the ‘Very Dissatisfied’ stage (AOR = 0.97, p < 0.001) (Table 6 ).

Similarly, the two-way ANOVA of reaction speed (see Figure 4(b) ) revealed a marginally significant difference for congruency [ F (1,16) = 206.08, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.93], with participants responding faster in the congruent condition (428.61 ± 41.40 ms) than in the incongruent condition (476.94 ± 42.12 ms).

A negative binomial regression model to estimate the effect on the Contact to Intubation interval from distance to the scene, physiological characteristics, while controlling for the dispatch system type, entrapment/difficult access, indication for intubation, first pass success, grade of first intubator demonstrated a marginally significant relationship between dispatch period and Contact to Intubation interval ( χ 2 (16) = 88.89, P < 0.001; b = −0.159; P = 0.049) (Table S2 ).

However, the predicted interaction between compensation and nation remained marginally significant, although the effect of compensation was slightly stronger among Americans, t (50) = 12.15, p < 0.001, d = 1.63, than among Japanese t (49) = 8.54, p < 0.001, d = 1.22.

In a regression analysis, with classification accuracy as the outcome variable, model type and number of hidden states were highly significant regressors ( p < 0.001), and the number of networks was marginally significant ( p = 0.07) ( Supporting Information Table S1 ).

neutral faces) produced marginally significant brain activation in the left cuneus (BA 18 and BA19): peak voxel xyz: −3 −82 28, T = 3.96, p < 0.001, cluster size: 150, cluster p FWE = 0.08).

Co-occurrence was significantly higher than the baseline level regardless of sex (χ 2 = 13.78, p < 0.001 in boys; χ 2 = 45.44, p < 0.001 in girls), school locations (χ 2 = 50.70, p < 0.001 in urban schools; χ 2 = 3.29, p = 0.081 a marginally significant effect in rural schools), and grades (χ 2 = 18.34, p < 0.001 in Grade 4; χ 2 = 35.81, p < 0.001 in Grade 5).

Standardized path coefficients for TDP and DOC regarding their effects on BA were positive and significant or marginally significant (TDP: 0.625, p-value<0.001; DOC: 0.460, p-value<0.05).

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant interaction term and main effect of frequency ( P < 0.001) and a marginally significant overall effect of groups ( P = 0.05).

Correlations between Urinary Metals, U-PHE, and 8-oxodG Significant, or marginally significant, linear correlations were found between 8-oxodG and the following metals: Mn (r = 0.354, p = 0.001), Tl (r = 0.321, p = 0.002), Zn (r = 0.309, p = 0.003), As (r = 0.309, p = 0.003), Pb (r = 0.283, p = 0.007), Co (r = 0.239, p = 0.024), Ba (r=0.213, p = 0.045), Cr (r = 0.213, p = 0.045), and Cd (r = 0.194, p = 0.071).

However, using a Bonferroni correction and corresponding alpha of 0.001, lifetime history of major depressive disorder and persistent depressive disorder was the only disorders significantly correlated with misophonia severity, and the correlation with current OCD was marginally significant ( p = 0.001).

Effects of biotic and abiotic conditions on specialization The protozoans showed a marginally significant effect when in their own temperature but with bacteria from different origins (specialization to biotic conditions; parameter = −0.88, P ‐value = 0.070), and a highly significant effect when in different temperatures and with their local bacteria (specialization to abiotic conditions; parameter = −2.05, P ‐value < 0.001, see Table S4), when compared to their densities in local abiotic and biotic conditions.

Intraclass correlation TD and TD siblings The intraclass correlation analyses showed a significant similarity in the left stria terminalis for RD (ICC = 0.772, P < 0.001) and a marginally significant correlation for FA (ICC = 0.704, P = 0.001) among typical siblings.

Also, there were marginally significant associations between the use of thiazides and the risk of BCC (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02 - 1.38; I 2 = 89.6%; Q = 28.8, P < 0.001) and MM (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01 - 1.29; I 2 = 0.0%; Q = 2.5, P = 0.447).

One‐sided likelihood‐ratio (LR) tests pursued to evaluate the statistical significance of the family variance for survival showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) results for the unbrowsed planting in both species, but marginally significant ( p = 0.046) and non‐significant ( p > 0.05) results in the browsed planting in E. ovata and E. pauciflora , respectively (Table S8 ).

Since our primary interest was in the Near Approach and the interaction effect between Condition and Distance was marginally significant, we examined the Near Approach revealing a significantly greater SCR response to the spider than the ball t (30) = 4.57, p < 0.001, d = 1.67.

The database provides the following information: (i) In addition to all the GVs annotated in the NHGRI GWAS Catalog, we manually curated the GVs that are marginally significant ( P < 1.0 × 10 −3 ) collected from supplementary materials of each original publication.