“marginally significant”

Although maternal treatment did not influence nestling growth rate between days 3 and 7, there was a marginally significant negative relationship between maternal CORTnest and nestling growth rate ( P =0.092, Table 3 ).

There was a marginally significant main effect of group (the remote cloud-based rehabilitation group vs the control group), F (1,160) = 2.88, P = .092, η 2 = 0.018; PPVT-R test results in cloud-based rehabilitation were significantly larger than those in the control group.

Finally, except for the initial fixation position showing a marginally significant interaction effect (p = .092), all other indicators showed no significant interaction effects between initial morpheme positional frequency and reading phase (all p > 0.1), suggesting largely independent contributions of positional frequency and learning phase to eye-movement behavior.

It was interesting to note that for α3β1, there was a marginally significant difference between the expressions in the primary tumor and those in the metastatic tumor ( P =0.092).

3 , and the non-linear test was marginally significant for pre-frail transition ( p = 0.092) and not significant for frail transition ( p = 0.225).

5 ), there was a marginally significant difference between the placebo ( EMM = 851, SE = 27.9, 95% CI [796–905]) and caffeine ( EMM = 825, SE = 27.9, 95% CI [771–880]) conditions, Z = 2.33, p = 0.092, and between the placebo and the concurrent flavanols and caffeine conditions ( EMM = 826, SE = 27.9, 95% CI [771–880]), Z = 2.30, p = 0.097.

However, its relation with the overall survival of patients is marginally significant (Log Rank p = 0.092).

For the three features which were marginally significant for overall survival, tumors with high radial gradient border SD (Figure 1A , HR = 1.92; 95% CI 0.90-4.11, p = 0.092) and radial deviation tumor SD (Figure 1E , HR = 2.00; 95% CI 0.92-4.34, p = 0.078) were associated with poor overall survival while high radial gradient outside-tumor separation mean was associated with improved overall survival (Figure 1B , HR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.22-1.06, p = 0.068).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between congruency and consciousness, F (1,38) = 3.0, p = 0.092, η p 2 = 0.07, indicating a slightly larger congruency effect in the conscious group ( M : 5.3%), compared to the unconscious group ( M : 3.0%).

Education At all time points, there was a greater percentage of CR+ patients who received education materials related to managing a concussion from their providers compared to CAU patients; however, only at 1 week post-enrollment was the difference marginally significant ( p = 0.092).

Specifically, there were no significant differences in hypoxia between the T category but a marginally significant association between tumor hypoxia and metastasis status ( P = 0.092, Mann-Whitney U test, Fig. 1 B).

The difference in A parameters was marginally significant, t(19) = 1.77, p = .092).

Finally, also in the exploratory analysis of the DLS, the one-sample t- test against zero indicated a marginally significant looking bias ( M = 0.16, s.d. = 0.83) towards the correct door, t 74 = 1.71, p = 0.092, Cohen's d = 0.20.

Secondary outcomes Responder analysis There is a marginally significant overall intervention effect in the percent free of HDD during the last 8 weeks (F(2,113) = 2.43, p = 0.092).

This interaction effect also showed up in the diffusion model parameter drift rate ( F [1, 87] = 152.52, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.64) and a marginally significant effect was found for non-decision time ( F [1, 87] = 2.90, p = .092, η p 2 = 0.03).

This 2 × 2 ANOVA also revealed a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 164) = 2.88, p = .092, η p 2 = .02, but the pattern differed from the significant interaction with men's self-ratings.

In LPC (500–700 ms), the results showed that the main effect of the two conditions is marginally significant, F 1 , 45 = 2.956 , p = 0.092 , η ρ 2 = 0.062 [ 0.00 , 0.18 ] , and all participants under infelicitous contextual condition ( Μ = − 0.941 μ V ) elicited greater LPC than felicitous condition ( Μ = 0.007 μ V ) .

For Category A, the interaction of the within-individual factor Classification with the covariate Negative Affect was marginally significant, F (3,44) = 2.29, p = 0.092, η p 2 = 0.135, but not for Category B, F (3,46) = 2.06, p = 0.120, η p 2 = 0.123.

The analysis revealed significant main effects of both gender (Wilks’ Λ = 0.85, F [4, 4271] = 187.92, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.150) and grade (Wilks’ Λ = 0.96, F [12, 11300.29] = 11.630, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.011, Roy’s GCR = 0.032, F [4, 4273] = 34.51, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.031), with the gender x grade interaction found to be marginally significant (Wilks’ Λ = 0.99, F [12, 11300.29] = 1.57, p = 0.092, Roy’s GCR = 0.003, F (4, 4273) = 3.199, p = 0.012, partial η 2 = 0.003).

Differences in GI values resulted in marginally significant differences between RU-DIMESA and COMM (difference 21.4; 95% C.I. −2~4.7; p -value = 0.092) and between RU-PONTE and ICS (difference 22.1; 95% C.I. −0.8~45.0; p -value = 0.092).

Lastly, a marginally significant improvement in reaction times was observed in a letter 2-back transfer task following frontal stimulation (β = − .034; p < .092) across all participants.

Omnibus ANOVA indicated that there is significant Anterior-posterior * Group interaction (Interaction effect: F (5.63, 95.73) = 4.5, p < 0.001) and marginally significant interaction between Group, Deviant, and Anterior-Posterior dimension (Interaction effect: F (21.41, 364.04) = 1.5, p = 0.092).

There was a modest positive correlation between α and years of education that was marginally significant ( r = 0.051, P = .092).

Ψ 1 ) was marginally significant ( β = .55, 95% CI −0.09 to 1.19, p = .092).

Increasing flare frequency was associated with marginally significant HAQ-DI (F=2.177, P < .092) and significantly greater mean HAQ-Pain (F=13.846, P < .001) as well as more PHQ anxiety (χ2=10.862, P < .012) and depression (χ2=7.061, P < .071). 15.5% reported past year ER/UC use, and 8.6% reported one or more hospital admissions, but neither was associated with flare frequency, perhaps due to the chronic and slowly progressive nature of IBM.