Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
The effect of age group on response time was marginally significant, with juveniles tending to have faster response time ( t = −1.943; p = 0.093; Figure 4C ). 4 Discussion In our study, contrary to our predictions, we could not detect any difference in performance between species, sexes, or age groups, as correct choices were only influenced by the different quantity combinations.
marginally significantp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
engaging emotions and emotion suppression [ B = 0.33, t (265.72) = 1.99, p = 0.047, 95% CI (−0.005, 0.66)] 3 , and this relationship was marginally significant for Japanese partners [ B = 0.20, t (257.22) = 1.685, p = 0.093, 95% CI (−0.033, 0.42)], but not significant for Belgian partners [ B = −0.13, t (262.56) = −1.15, p = 0.25, 95% CI (−0.37, 0.10)] 4 , 5 .
marginally significantp = .0931.9× alphagold
(Only STEM women descriptively preferred integrating the STEM-stereotypic target, b = −0.10, whereas STEM men and non-STEM women had the opposite preference, respective b s = 0.10 and 0.11, but these simple effects were nonsignificant, p s > .18.) Replicating the interaction pattern for friendship formation in the pilot experiment, the hypothesized STEM Female Contrast × Target Stereotypicality × Brokerage interaction was marginally significant, χ 2 (1) = 2.83, p = .093 (see Table 5 ).
marginally significantp = .0931.9× alphagold
When the ANOVA was repeated by including the six participants who reported the last crying episode earlier than the last scene in the film, the overall change in mood became marginally significant in the crying group [F(3, 29) = 1.76; p = .093; partial η 2 = .08], but all the hypothesized changes (T1–T2, T2–T4, and T1–T4) remained significant ( p < .001, p < .001, and p = .003, respectively).
marginally significantp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
The exotic allele also increased single grain weight, thousand kernel weight, spike number, and biomass with a significant increase in single grain weight in NIL pair 3 (p ≤ 0.001, 12.2%), thousand kernel weight in NIL pair 3 and 4 (p = 0.023, 2.9–11.0%), and biomass in NIL pair 1 (p = 0.013) and marginally significant differences in NIL pair 3 (p = 0.093).
marginally significantp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
As shown in Table 3 , although some p -values were marginally significant, individuals who had received at least a senior school diploma had a 4.71-fold (RR = 4.71, p = 0.093) and 3.48-fold (RR = 3.48, p = 0.039) probability of being classified in Class 3 than in Classes 1 and 2, respectively.