“marginally significant”

(Only STEM women descriptively preferred integrating the STEM-stereotypic target, b = −0.10, whereas STEM men and non-STEM women had the opposite preference, respective b s = 0.10 and 0.11, but these simple effects were nonsignificant, p s > .18.) Replicating the interaction pattern for friendship formation in the pilot experiment, the hypothesized STEM Female Contrast × Target Stereotypicality × Brokerage interaction was marginally significant, χ 2 (1) = 2.83, p = .093 (see Table 5 ).

The main effect of feature sequence was marginally significant; F (1, 15) = 3.21, p = 0.0931, η 2 p = 0.18, whereas none of the interactions were significant ( p s > 0.183).

chalybea , and the results showed that there was marginally significant difference (binomial GLM, deviance = 2.81, df = 1 P = 0.0932; Table S2).

Table 4 shows that the interaction (Income × KHE × SR) is marginally significant ( b = 0.1061, p = 0.0933) and increments significantly the explained variance of BMI (R 2 change = 0.0094, F (1,291) = 2.8358, p = 0.0933).

Finally, although marginally significant, active arts participants also reported better social functioning ( t (442)=1.68, p = 0.0939, d =0.17) and mental health ( t (442)=1.84, p = 0.0668, d =0.18).

Interestingly, a marginally significant three-way interaction between Belief, Desire and Stimulation ( p = 0.094, β = −0.003) was also detected.

Before washing, a marginally significant difference was found between the median depths of mucus covering the mucosa and covering cancer tissue (100.7 μm vs. 48.9 μm; P = 0.094); in contrast, after washing, no significant difference was found in this comparison (36.8 μm vs. 26.1 μm; P = 0.570).

Marginally significant group differences were found, t (7) = −1.93, p = 0.094, d = 1.03.

The four-way interaction for Gender × Country-Level Structural Stigma × Gender Nonconformity × Socioeconomic Status was marginally significant ( F = 2.81, p = .094), thereby motivating stratified analyses.

Moreover, an ANOVA comparing stimulus modality and presentation condition revealed a significant interaction between stimulus modality and condition ( F (1,17) = 6.55, p = 0.020), a marginally significant difference between stimulus modality indicating greater responses in this region to auditory than visual stimuli ( F (1,17) = 3.14, p = 0.094) and no main effect of condition ( p = 0.9).

There were marginally significant differences in sitting and bending forward, F (2,157) = 2.41, p = 0.094, η p 2 = 0.03.

Statistical analysis revealed that the P value is marginally significant ( Figure 7 , P = 0.094, Spore + G-CSF + EPO vs.

Marginally significant interaction of genotype × diagnosis was found in delayed memory index scores (F = 2.37, p = 0.094, eta-squared = 0.005).

The subsequent multiple linear regression analysis ( F (4,356) = 9.24, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.31, AdjR 2 = 0.08) showed that Enjoyment/Arousal had a marginally significant predictive power ( ß = 0.10, p = 0.094), while Money was a full significant predictor ( ß = 0.18, p = 0.002) of GD symptoms.

high time pressure/high cognitive load) and the covariate BIS yielded a marginally significant main effect of situational regulatory focus ( F (1,245) = 2.82, p = .094, η p 2 = .011) and no other effects (all Fs < 1.7, all ps > .20, all η p 2 < .01).

Chi‐square tests revealed a marginally significant association between treatment group and the proportion of participants demonstrating reliable improvements in YOQSR2.0 scores, Χ 2 ( df = 1, N = 106) = 2.80, p = .094, V = 0.16.

Fitness to drive The first step of our analysis ( Table 4 ) involving cognitive predictors ( Table 1 ) for fitness to drive (currently fit versus currently unfit to drive), allowed a marginally significant prediction of fitness to drive ( χ 2 = 6.40, p = 0.094) with an overall accuracy of 72.5% and with maze processing time as significant predictor ( p = 0.042).

The genotype by temperature interaction was marginally significant in both segments ("GxT" effect, p = 0.094 and p = 0.073, respectively) (Figs 4B , 4C and S5 ).

Although the cross effect had not been retained in the best model for reproductive investment (see Appendix A ), this effect was marginally significant in the full model ( P = 0.094).

Identity For illness identity (IIQ, adolescents only), the condition × time interaction was significant for the rejection dimension ( B = .85, SE = .41, p = .047) and marginally significant for enrichment ( B = −.91, SE = .52, p = .094).

Interestingly, the large-intestine cancer showed negative correlation (marginally significant, P = 0.094) between mutations and age, which seems counterintuitive; but patients older than 50 presented non-decreasing mutations with increasing age.

Race by gender interaction term was marginally significant on glycemic control (B = 0.34, 95% CI = −0.24–3.00, p = 0.094).

We find no statistically significant impacts of LEAP1000 on birthweight among the overall complete-case sample, although there is a marginally significant increase in average birthweight (82 g; p = 0.094).

Using permutation tests based on random reshuffling of sample labels when comparing G3 control samples to either G3 drought or SA samples ( supplementary text S3 , Supplementary Material online), we found a significant reduction in the proportion of 24 nt sRNAs after grandparental SA treatment (bootstrap test, P = 0.035), and also marginally significant shifts in 24 nt sRNAs after grandparental drought treatment (bootstrap test, P = 0.094) and in 21 nt sRNAs after grandparental SA treatment (bootstrap test, P = 0.086) ( fig. 1 A and D ).

There was a marginally significant increase in attentional bias to angry faces in the up- compared to no-regulation group, t (36) = 1.72, p = 0.094 ( Figure 1 ).