Moreover, an ANOVA comparing stimulus modality and presentation condition revealed a significant interaction between stimulus modality and condition ( F (1,17) = 6.55, p = 0.020), a marginally significant difference between stimulus modality indicating greater responses in this region to auditory than visual stimuli ( F (1,17) = 3.14, p = 0.094) and no main effect of condition ( p = 0.9).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
An independent-samples t -test revealed that the difference between the two groups were marginally significant [ t (21) = 1.75, p = 0.094, Cohen’s d = -0.73; M Unfamiliar-Switch = 43.12%, SD Unfamiliar-Switch = 25.95%, M Nonsense-Switch = 24.81%, SD Nonsense-Switch = 24.19%).
Using permutation tests based on random reshuffling of sample labels when comparing G3 control samples to either G3 drought or SA samples ( supplementary text S3 , Supplementary Material online), we found a significant reduction in the proportion of 24 nt sRNAs after grandparental SA treatment (bootstrap test, P = 0.035), and also marginally significant shifts in 24 nt sRNAs after grandparental drought treatment (bootstrap test, P = 0.094) and in 21 nt sRNAs after grandparental SA treatment (bootstrap test, P = 0.086) ( fig. 1 A and D ).
Although the cross effect had not been retained in the best model for reproductive investment (see Appendix A ), this effect was marginally significant in the full model ( P = 0.094).
Marginally significant group differences were found, t (7) = −1.93, p = 0.094, d = 1.03.
The genotype by temperature interaction was marginally significant in both segments ("GxT" effect, p = 0.094 and p = 0.073, respectively) (Figs 4B , 4C and S5 ).
This revealed a significant main effect of dominance [ F (2,70) = 8.88, P < 0.001], and a marginally significant main effect of trustworthiness [ F (2,70) = 2.45, P = 0.094].
Leaders again perceived the intervals to be shorter than followers, F (1, 22) = 8.02, p = 0.010, η 2 p = 0.27, and this effect was qualified by a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 21) = 2.65, p = 0.094, η 2 p = 0.20.
In the East Asian population, the association was directionally consistent and marginally significant (OR: 1.085, 95% CI 0.986 to 1.193, p=0.094; table 1 and online supplemental table 3 ).
Control group also showed marginally significant reduction in SBP after 12 weeks (−5.61 mmHg, p = 0.094).
Herbivore-mediated selection on flowering start date was detected in populations 4 (marginally significant, Δβ herb ± SE = 0.13 ± 0.102, P = 0.094), 5 and 6 ( Figure 3B , Supplementary Figures 2A,B,C , and Supplementary Table 6 ).
high time pressure/high cognitive load) and the covariate BIS yielded a marginally significant main effect of situational regulatory focus ( F (1,245) = 2.82, p = .094, η p 2 = .011) and no other effects (all Fs < 1.7, all ps > .20, all η p 2 < .01).
The associations of eQTLs and pQTLs for PCSK9 with vascular calcification were marginally significant (−0.05 SD units in AAC quantity per SD reduction in PCSK9 expression level; 95% CI −0.12 to 0.01; P = 0.094; −0.17 SD units in AAC quantity per SD reduction in PCSK9 level; 95% CI −0.32 to −0.02; P = 0.029) [Supplementary Table 4, Supplementary Figure 3, http://links.lww.com/CM9/C517 ].
The four-way interaction for Gender × Country-Level Structural Stigma × Gender Nonconformity × Socioeconomic Status was marginally significant ( F = 2.81, p = .094), thereby motivating stratified analyses.
Regarding the effects of reactive aggression, we also detected a marginally significant group, emotion, and electrode interaction effect [ F (8,352) = 1.99, p = 0.095, η 2 = 0.04].
Additionally, there was a marginally significant interaction effect between time and test, exhibiting a medium effect after the Greenhouse–Geisser correction was applied (F = 2.659, p = 0.095, partial η2 = 0.081, medium effect).
Additionally, baseline cortisol levels were positively associated with the composite benefit score, though this finding was marginally significant ( p = 0.095).
Moreover, the high E 2 group showed a tendency for long naps in the daytime, and the difference was marginally significant ( Figure 5 E, P = 0.095, rank-sum test; and Figure 5 A).
Furthermore, the three-way interaction of Group × Correctness × Condition was marginally significant [ F (1,30) = 2.97, p = 0.095, η p 2 = 0.09].
In addition, depression and trait anxiety were significantly correlated ( r = 0.525, p < 0.001); after controlling for depression, the left AI-right dACC and right AI-right dACC FC correlations with anxiety were marginally significant ( r = −0.219, p = 0.095; r = −0.224, p = 0.087).
Finally, a marginally significant interaction was found between SCHEMA and MEMORY LEVEL ( F (1,47) = 2.91, p = 0.095), suggesting that it might be possible that differences between the schema conditions are somewhat larger for global recognition (mean difference = 0.42, SD = 0.51) than for detailed recognition (mean difference = 0.30, SD = 0.46).
The random effect likelihood ratio test for the pair random intercept was marginally significant ( p = 0.095), with ICC of 0.471.
This group difference for detail-based viewing in the relational condition remained marginally significant after adjusting for age and gender, F (1, 34) = 2.96, p = 0.095, η p 2 = 0.080. 3.2.2.2.1.
A two-way ANOVA with the factors odor (2: chocolate, popcorn) × social identity (2: Swiss primed with Swiss identity, non-Swiss primed with Swiss identity) on intensity difference scores revealed a marginally significant interaction [ F (1, 48) = 2.90, p = 0.095, η 2 = 0.057].
Physical leisure activities in Model 1c-3 presented a marginally significant association between monthly exercise and cognitive functioning at T2 (B = 0.19, p = 0.095).