Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0941.9× alphagold
Moreover, an ANOVA comparing stimulus modality and presentation condition revealed a significant interaction between stimulus modality and condition ( F (1,17) = 6.55, p = 0.020), a marginally significant difference between stimulus modality indicating greater responses in this region to auditory than visual stimuli ( F (1,17) = 3.14, p = 0.094) and no main effect of condition ( p = 0.9).
marginally significantp = 0.0941.9× alphagold
An independent-samples t -test revealed that the difference between the two groups were marginally significant [ t (21) = 1.75, p = 0.094, Cohen’s d = -0.73; M Unfamiliar-Switch = 43.12%, SD Unfamiliar-Switch = 25.95%, M Nonsense-Switch = 24.81%, SD Nonsense-Switch = 24.19%).
marginally significantP = 0.0941.9× alphagold
Using permutation tests based on random reshuffling of sample labels when comparing G3 control samples to either G3 drought or SA samples ( supplementary text S3 , Supplementary Material online), we found a significant reduction in the proportion of 24 nt sRNAs after grandparental SA treatment (bootstrap test, P = 0.035), and also marginally significant shifts in 24 nt sRNAs after grandparental drought treatment (bootstrap test, P = 0.094) and in 21 nt sRNAs after grandparental SA treatment (bootstrap test, P = 0.086) ( fig. 1 A and D ).
marginally significantP = 0.0941.9× alphagold
The associations of eQTLs and pQTLs for PCSK9 with vascular calcification were marginally significant (−0.05 SD units in AAC quantity per SD reduction in PCSK9 expression level; 95% CI −0.12 to 0.01; P = 0.094; −0.17 SD units in AAC quantity per SD reduction in PCSK9 level; 95% CI −0.32 to −0.02; P = 0.029) [Supplementary Table 4, Supplementary Figure 3, http://links.lww.com/CM9/C517 ].
marginally significantp = 0.0951.9× alphagold
Finally, a marginally significant interaction was found between SCHEMA and MEMORY LEVEL ( F (1,47) = 2.91, p = 0.095), suggesting that it might be possible that differences between the schema conditions are somewhat larger for global recognition (mean difference = 0.42, SD = 0.51) than for detailed recognition (mean difference = 0.30, SD = 0.46).