“marginally significant”

Chi-square tests revealed significant demographic differences between the clusters in terms of age ( χ 2 (4) = 10.78, p = 0.029) and continent ( χ 2 (3) = 25.54, p < 0.001), and marginally significant differences for educational level ( χ 2 (4) = 7.86, p = 0.097) and robot encounters ( χ 2 (2) = 5.28, p = 0.071).

There was a marginally significant main effect of Response Side ( b = –0.0076, t = –1.6574, p = .097), with a tendency to respond slower with the left hand.

The effect of food is marginally significant at 13°C ( F (1, 285) = 2.77; P = 0.097), but still the biphasic growth model gave better performance in ‘fed’ condition compared with the ‘non-fed’ condition ( Fig. 3A ).

A subordinate ANOVA that was run separately for distractor noise patches, including the factor Cueing (cued, uncued) and the factor Extracted Field (Localizer, Surround), indicated that the main effect of Cueing was marginally significant ( F (1,31) = 2.938, p = .097, ηp 2 =. 087) with a significant interaction between Cueing and Extracted Field (F (1,31) = 8.047, p = .008, ηp 2 =.206 ) , confirming higher cueing effects for the Surround than for the Localizer (cued vs. uncued Noise Localizer: t (31) = -.899, p = .376, Cohen’s d: -.16; cued vs. uncued Noise Surround: t (31) = -2.36, p = .025, Cohen’s d: -.42).

As represented by the stratification analysis ( Table 2 ), this effect, although marginally significant in POSH data ( P = 0.097, HR = 0.75, 95% C.I.= 0.53, 1.06), has similar patterns in both data sets ( Figure S1 ) and the significance is largely improved in the pooled analysis ( P = 0.0035, HR = 0.73, 95% C.I. = 0.59, 0.9).

Firstly, we revealed a marginally significant negative TGP × FGA × unemployment interaction effect ( β = −0.06, p = 0.097) on the chance of starting VET (DV1_start).

For the head we observed a significant main effect of valence ( F 1,90 = 18.32, p <0.001), with more positive values for positive than negative scenarios, no significant main effect of scenario ( F 3,270 = 1,17, p = 0.323) and a marginally significant interaction valence x scenario ( F 3,270 = 2.12, p = 0.097).

In addition, the theta power for the restrained eaters under the no-think condition was much higher (marginally significant) than that under the think condition for high-calorie food stimuli ( p = 0.097), which was not identified in the control group.

For men, reactance at T1 was marginally significant ( r = −.392, p = .097): the more men felt restricted in their freedom the less they exercised at T2.

Such a facilitation effect of processing negative words on responses to the bottom spatial targets was also marginally significant [ F 1 (1,47) = 2.87, p = 0.097, ηp 2 = 0.06; F 2 (1,286) = 3.07, p = 0.081, ηp 2 = 0.01].

The MDI was higher for the GC cases compared with the healthy controls, and the result was marginally significant ( p = 0.097) for the total population.

However, both treatments resulted in on-average increases to yield ( Figure 1A ), which included a marginally significant 1.17-fold increase for BC1 (p = 0.097), and a significant 2.22-fold increase for BC2 (p = 0.003).

0.0036, p = 0.037; Table 1 ); a marginally significant difference also occurred in GCs with or without lymph node metastasis (0.0025 vs. 0.0013, p = 0.097; Table 1 ); and a difference in the P16 methylation level in SMs was found between poorly and well/moderately differentiated patients (0.0021 vs. 0.0013, p = 0.018; Table 2 ).

The main effect of base attractiveness was marginally significant, F (1, 38) = 2.901, p = 0.097, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta_{p}^{2}$$\end{document} η p 2 = 0.071.

SH+ demonstrated a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.097) in reducing anxiety and post-traumatic symptomatology (Riello et al. , 2021 ).

For AMS category, partial regression coefficients of “Sleepiness on rising” and “Refreshing” were significant ( P < 0.05, respectively), whereas that of “Δ P B per hour from the 5th to the summit” was marginally significant ( P = 0.097).

A binary logistic regression analysis revealed a main effect of mating motivation ( α = 1.37, SE = 0.63, Waldχ 2 (1) = 4.73, p = .030; Exp(B) = 3.94), and the Mating × Gender two-way interaction was marginally significant ( α = 1.34, SE = 0.80, Waldχ 2 (1) = 2.75, p = .097; Exp(B) = 3.80).

Correlation Between the BRCALncSig and Chemo-Response To examine whether the BRCALncSig correlated with the likelihood of CR, we plotted the percentage of patients achieving CR against the BRCALncSig and found that there is a marginally significant negative correlation between the BRCALncSig and CR (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.55, p = 0.097) ( Figure 5A ).

The value of the dissimilarity index increased as ΔF increased (Spearman's rho = 0.46, p < 0.0001) and, across all channels from all patients, showed a marginally significant difference based on percept alone ( W + = 3427, p = 0.097) in the expected direction (i.e., greater dissimilarity indices for 2- vs. 1-stream percepts), suggesting a propensity for activity during 2-stream percepts to be more similar to activity evoked by large ΔF conditions.

The AS RRM had more differences (i.e., accelerated evolution) in comparison to the CS RRM (i.e., AS RRM: 192 bp, 19.8% sites with substitution, across species = 0.0744 ± 0.0095, K S = 0.4034 and K A = 0.0340; CS RRM: 219 bp, 13.7% sites with substitution, across species = 0.0489 ± 0.0067, K S = 0.2047 and K A = 0.0), and this difference was marginally significant (G 2 = 2.75, p = 0.097).

None of these covariates were significant although T-stage was marginally significant (p = 0.097) ( table 2 ).

The teams’ average FWHR remained a marginally significant predictor of total points negotiated ( b = 1.31, SE = 0.78, t [109] = 1.67, p = 0.097) and the teams’ maximum FWHR remained a significant predictor of total points ( b = 1.23, SE = 0.57, t [109] = 2.16, p = 0.033).

This analysis demonstrated that contingency was still a marginally significant predictor of sensorimotor alpha suppression at post-test, beta = −.554, p = .097 (lower 95% CI = −1.531, upper 95% CI = .156).

Depressive symptoms showed significant time effects ( F [ 2 ] = 5.91, p = .003) and group effects ( F [ 1 ] = 4.97, p =.027), and the marginally significant time-by-group interaction was found ( F (2, 298) = = 2.35, p = .097).

The difference between the two experiments was marginally significant [ t = 1.454, df = 967, P = 0.097].