“marginally significant”

Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05 and marginally significant if P < 0.10.

In addition, 58.2% (128/220) of the participants prepared for the breathing training (milestone 4), with a marginally significant difference across interventions ( P =.10).

However, those living in small metropolitan counties had marginally significant, lower odds of reporting poor/fair SRH than those in non-metro counties (OR = 0.89, p ≤ 0.10).

Statistical analyses The ten potential covariates (see above) were tested as candidate confounds, with covariates retained if they had any significant association with any of the three vagal tone measures, including any marginally significant ( p < 0.10) relationships.

On the other hand, those belonging to other castes had 0.809 times lower chances, suggesting a modest decrease in the probability of receiving JSY benefit compared to the ST category, which was marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Concerning community-level factors, the specific type of residential area showed a marginally significant relationship ( p < 0.10) with the simultaneous occurrence of stunting and anaemia.

Variables identified as marginally significant ( P < 0.1) in univariate analyses were subsequently incorporated into multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate associations between clinical variables and CSKP/CRKP group.

As would be expected, stunting rates are higher when the samples are restricted to older children, but the only notable impact on the changes is that the marginally significant (p < 0.1) estimated 3.5 percentage point fall in stunting in Rwanda gains slightly in magnitude but loses significance. 3.2.

All significant effects, including lower-order ones, are reported, and marginally significant effects are noted if p < .1.

The light grey shading on Figure 3b indicates that treatment differences in Q-TWiST were either significant ( P⩽ 0.05) or marginally significant (0.05< P <0.1) for most utility combinations, with the exception of the left-bottom corner with TOX and REL utilities both <0.2.

Table 3 presents the results of the final multivariate models, including marginally significant predictors from the factor models at p < 0.10 as well as demographic predictors.

All calculations and analyses were conducted in the statistical program R version 4.2.3 (R Core Team 2023 ) ( α = 0.05, with results 0.05 < p < 0.1 reported as marginally significant). 3.

Environmental enteric dysfunction marker concentrations were then categorized in tertiles, and an interaction term was incorporated in the statistical models and further examined if marginally significant ( P < 0.1).

S4 A , Supplementary Material online). When a test for general population differentiation, that is, irrespective of malaria, was applied using the X T X statistic described by Gunther and Coop (2013) , significant ( P < 0.05) signals were found for SNPs rs1128127 in the DERL3 gene and rs84833095 in the TLR1 gene, and marginally significant signals ( P < 0.10) were found for SNPs rs2706384 in the IRF1 gene and rs1803632 in the GBP7 gene ( supplementary fig.

For school-based involvement, however, mothers working non-standard hours had greater levels than those working standard hours ( b = 1.177), though the difference was marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

All results with α < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant; marginally significant results ( p < 0.1; i.e., α < 0.10) are also mentioned.

The linear regressions were considered significant when P < 0.05 and marginally significant when P < 0.1.

Due to the small sample size, we decided to highlight marginally significant effects (p < .10) when reporting the regression results [ 65 ].

Four additional variables had marginally significant ( p < .10) associations with PTSD: education, unit cohesion, positive deployment experiences, and total number of career combat deployments.

We did not use a strict stay criterion for identifying predictors in the multivariate model; predictors were included in the multivariate model if they were marginally significant in the univariate model (p<0.10), clinically important, or strongly prognostic.

Variables that had a marginally significant relationship with PNC utilisation ( p < 0.1) were considered for the final model.

Educational level effects became marginally significant (p = 0.10) while the nutritional state stopped being significant (p > 0.10).

A difference was declared significant when P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant when 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

5 We observed significantly increased expression in Chrnd and Runx1 at 24 months compared with 5‐month‐old mice ( P = 0.013 and 0.045, respectively) and a marginally significant increase ( P < 0.1) in expression of Gadd45ɑ comparing 24‐month‐old mice with 5‐month‐old mice ( P = 0.088) ( Figure S6 ).

We additionally explored mediation of ideal smoking, ideal physical activity, and ideal nutrition, and only found marginally significant ( P <0.10) indirect effects for ideal smoking in the association of SNs and CHD events for men and women (Tables S1 and S2 ).