“marginally significant”

The levels of protein carbonyls had a marginally significant negative association to the mass of structural tissue ( T = −2.10, p = 0.041) but were not significantly related to masses of any other body compartment or levels of circulating hormone levels.

The association was marginally significant among participants with obesity (1.11 [1.00, 1.23], p = 0.041).

The second SNP, rs9493627, replicated in the UK Biobank (p = 0.0095), the other GERA race/ethnicity groups (p = 0.0080), and was marginally significant and in the correct direction for SRT (p = 0.041) and suggestively so for SDS (p = 0.081).

Begg’s test reported a marginally significant correlation (tau = −1.000; p = 0.041, uncorrected), which could indicate asymmetry in effect sizes.

We observed marginally significant negative correlation between these contrasts ( p = 0.041; rho = −0.312, one-sided Spearman rank correlation), meaning that the higher the changes in the BMI, the higher the corresponding changes in the number of mtDNA copies.

Among all other populations only Tasmanian flies show a marginally significant among-line variation ( P -value = 0.041).

Dimension 2 of the PCoA generated from the weighted unifrac distances among the translocated koalas’ initial microbiomes was a marginally significant predictor of their change in body condition over the first month post-translocation (R 2 = 0.327, t = 2.31, p = 0.041; Figure 4 ).

The power within each spectral band did not statistically differ among the nine intervals based on Friedman tests for the VLF band (p=0.358) or the LF band (p=0.081) but was marginally significant for the HF band (p=0.041).

Interestingly, while no significant relationship was found between CD47 and the clinical factors studied, a marginally significant trend was observed between higher IPI scores and increased EBV positivity (p = 0.041).

In the relative log(biomass) model (also R 2 = 0.10), the interaction between seed mass and the squared term for heterospecific density was marginally significant ( P = 0.041, Table 4 ) and indicated that light-seeded species exhibited a shallow hump-shaped relationship with heterospecific density whereas heavy-seeded species exhibited a shallow U-shaped relationship (Fig.

However, a comparison of haplotype frequencies between samples [4, 5] and [6–11] was marginally significant ( F CT = 0.016, P = 0.041, df = 1), but not for frequencies plus haplotype divergences (Φ SC = 0.005, P = 0.432, df = 1).

Further two-way PerMANOVA based on samples from two host species with the same localities indicated that localities had a significant effect on the Burkholderia community (Bray–Curtis, F = 1.521, p = 0.020; Jaccard, F = 1.311, p = 0.001) and that host species also had a marginally significant effect on the Burkholderia community (Bray–Curtis, F = 1.842, p = 0.041; Jaccard, F = 1.298, p = 0.045).

The Pearson correlation analysis showed marginally significant ( p = 0.041–0.076) moderate correlations between the working time values determined using ISO 4049 and FTIR (Fig. 4 ).

Moreover, the OS was longer in the PN group (21.71 ± 5.82 months) than in the PP group (20.01 ± 5.18 months), although the difference was marginally significant (t = 2213.5, P = 0.041).

Player hours in previous season is marginally significant (p=0.041).

There was a marginally significant ( P = 0.041) difference in the median time devoted to academic medicine between residents anticipating a fellowship (95%) versus those not anticipating a fellowship (90%).

Feeding guild was marginally significant in explaining heterogeneity in the data ( I 2 = 93.01, Q M = 14.66, df = 7, p = 0.041; marginal R 2 = 0.015), but only root herbivores (with 4 data points) showed a significant negative effect size (Figure S1 ).

A marginally significant interaction with dose was also detected ( P = 0.0411), suggesting some divergence between AA and Aa genotypes at higher doses (data not presented).

Pregnancy IVF outcome was a statistically significant factor influencing LH profile (F=3.73, p=0.0261) ( Figure 2A ); whereas, protocol treatment group was marginally significant (F=4.23, p=0.0411).

This was further supported by a Type III analysis of variance, which showed no significant effect for physician status (F = 1.2145, P = 0.31017) but a marginally significant effect for patient type (F = 4.8922, P = 0.04118) and an interaction between physician status and patient type (F = 3.7902, P = 0.06853).

Similarly, neither pCREB1a nor pCREB1c levels varied significantly between time periods in both the non-hibernation and hibernation seasons [one-way ANOVA, p = 0.831 (pCREB1a, non-hibernation), p = 0.0413 (pCREB1a, hibernation), p = 0.282 (pCREB1c, non-hibernation), p = 0.213 (pCREB1c, hibernation)], of which, although the one-way ANOVA analysis showed a marginally significant difference for pCREB1a in the hibernation season ( p = 0.0413), the subsequent Tukey’s test showed no significant difference in pairwise comparisons (Fig. 4 e, f).

However, at the 21‐day time point, while there was a marginally significant difference between the procedures ( p = 0.0415), this did not reach the threshold of statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons according to Bonferroni; therefore, no superiority can be claimed at this time point.

3 a, b), foraging guild remained a significant driver of fungal diversity ( n = 45, R = 0.239, P = 0.0004), and migration became marginally significant ( n = 45, DF = 2, F = 1.343, R 2 = 0.060, P = 0.0416).

For ZIKV Asian genotype, the variance among sire means was 0.008 and not significant ( p = 0.0918), and h 2 was 0.1526 and marginally significant ( p = 0.0416).

The two-way interaction between vertical displacement and horizontal misalignment was marginally significant, F (2,86) = 3.293, p = .0419, η p 2 = .037.